×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
4

Can any one explain this?

submitted by Rowdybme to whatever 1 yearJun 13, 2024 00:59:34 ago (+4/-0)     (files.catbox.moe)

https://files.catbox.moe/zmxt1a.jpg

This was the 5% question on this Gameshow on Amazon. Even after the explanation I still don't understand. I got all the questions right except for this one. The explanation is listed. He didn't elaborate on the show. Anyone know?


8 comments block


[ - ] Clueless_Enigma 5 points 1 yearJun 13, 2024 01:35:05 ago (+5/-0)

Lwlcnit (Logically, Which Letter Comes Next In The Sentence)

The Next word sequence begins with an S

Therefore S.

[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 4 points 1 yearJun 13, 2024 01:13:12 ago (+4/-0)

Are you literally retarded? The explanation explains it.

[ - ] Rowdybme [op] 0 points 1 yearJun 14, 2024 01:32:09 ago (+0/-0)

I didn't know what sentence it was talking about. I get it now.

[ - ] Rowdybme [op] 0 points 1 yearJun 14, 2024 01:30:27 ago (+0/-0)

Oh I get it now. All you turds that had the answer and question. Fuck you.

[ - ] VitaminSieg 0 points 1 yearJun 13, 2024 18:06:09 ago (+0/-0)

N

[ - ] Wahaha 0 points 1 yearJun 13, 2024 08:27:16 ago (+0/-0)

(L)ogically
(W)hat
(L)etter
(C)comes
(N)ext
(I)n
(T)his
(S)equence

LWLCNIT?


The answer is "S", as the word sequence starts with an "S".

[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 1 yearJun 13, 2024 01:59:44 ago (+0/-0)*

It tricks you by not placing commas around "sequence" in the first sentence of the question prompt. (The commas show up in the explanation.)

Without the commas in the question prompt, this causes you to read "next word sequence" in the first sentence as a direct reference to the second sentence.

But if you add commas, the first sentence will now read, "The next word, sequence, begins with an S." Now it isn't referring to the second sentence, but is literally telling you what the next word in the sequence is. That would make the final sequence LWLCNITSS.

The way you would have figured this punctuation trick out is:

If you interpreted "next word sequence" in the first sentence as a direct reference to the second sentence, then the first sentence would be false (a lie), since the second sentence does not begin with a word starting with S. So, from that you could gather that there needed to be commas in the first sentence.

[ - ] Rowdybme [op] 0 points 1 yearJun 14, 2024 01:33:28 ago (+0/-0)

No it tricked you bY making the question the answer.