"This wiki provides a place where current physics and cosmology theory can be openly challenged, and new and serious philosophies, theories, and models can be proposed without being labeled "pseudo science". Here you will find the scientists, books, scientific papers, websites, and organizations that are on the forefront of fixing today's broken science.
We do not allow for everyone in the public to edit this wiki. Consensus editing is not working. More often then not, solid criticisms and alternatives are relegated to pseudo-science on the simple fact that they are not supported by the mainstream. This of course is not logical. New ideas as never accepted instantaneously. New ideas take time to take hold. This is the knowledge repository for those new ideas and criticisms."
This was a lucky discovery I found through using one of those AI question answering things when I asked about some unusual technology. Apparently the AI researched a few sources instantaneously to find it and it listed this as one of the sources. So that's kind of interesting in itself.
Not flat, but expanding? Haven't actually heard that one before.
Apart from its implicit assumption of a constant radius Earth, there is very little data in conventional plate tectonics that is incompatible with the largely historical Expanding Earth theory, and vice versa. It is the same global data gathered about the same Earth—just interpreted differently.
@McNasty This could eliminate the problems with climates and all those other issues inherent to 'flat earth' theories.
No im saying you wouldnt honestly know what beliefs any flat earther here holds because nobody holds a genuine discussion with us.
The Agent Smith programming kicks in and I know this from personal experience. It was only a few years ago where I would call them retards and mock them and disregarded anything they would say.
I've heard them all. From Blackguard19 on old voat, to that slick flatter on conpro (Jack[numbers]), to McNasty here, and a bunch in between.
No climate model. No model to explain night and day. No answers to challenges. Just rhetoric, and fear of 'professor dave explains'. Yes, I know he's not a 'real' professor, that's just the name of his channel. I know, being crushed by such a reddit douche must be so embarrassing.
Jack was the most intelligent of them all, and he made no direct flatter claims but couched his rhetoric as 'questioning'. As I recall, he was the only one who admitted to watching a professor dave video, but even he refused the challenge to produce credible models for what we see.
It's kind of a fascinating mental illness, because it's so contrary to the data our eyes and minds produce, yet they're unable to explain any of it. You'd think they'd notice that in themselves, but they don't.
"Our solar system, including its family of planets, moon, asteroid, and comets, orbits around the center of the Milky Way galaxy at an average velocity of 828,000 km/hr or 143 mi/s (514,000 mph)"
Then we factor in the alleged speed of Earth around the sun which is 66,666 miles per hour. Then finally we arrive at the rotational speed of Earth which is 1000mph. This rotation is what supposedly causes the night and day cycle.
Then you disregard natural science, disregard your senses and submit to the authority figures that dictate that we don't experience any of this phenomena simply because of the scale in which it is taking place.
To explain how a sphere spinning at 1000mph, outputting centrifugal force, flinging objects away from it's core, is able to contain the plenum that allegedly resides within it's alleged atmosphere, you need the theory of gravity of course.
Oh shit wait, im regurgitating the nonsense you have FAITH in.
If you have "heard them all" as you claim then you should know of one of the many models that flat earth theorists have posited here many times before? Don't be so intellectually lazy. Do your own research instead of watching the faggot Professor Dave (who defends the existence of trannies. Not someone you should take scientific advice from) Professor Dave believes that women can have a penis.
Expanding Earth is one of those back-of-my-mind things I wonder about every once in a while. I haven't looked into it seriously because it would hard to prove one way or another. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_PS6HOz-oI
There's a really good video on youtube that I can't find right now. The guy goes over ocean floor ridges and other evidence. He's fairly convincing.
Cosmology needs challenged. What a load of obvious crap they've got all the idiot believing there, muh big bang, how black holes are created if they even exist, age of Universe, distances of things and on and on.
[ + ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager
[ - ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager 3 points 11 monthsJun 27, 2024 17:10:31 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes [op] 4 points 11 monthsJun 27, 2024 19:43:12 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 2 points 11 monthsJun 27, 2024 17:16:47 ago (+4/-2)
Not flat, but expanding? Haven't actually heard that one before.
@McNasty This could eliminate the problems with climates and all those other issues inherent to 'flat earth' theories.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 3 points 11 monthsJun 27, 2024 23:28:15 ago (+3/-0)
The flat earth society is the perfect example of controlled opposition.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 11 monthsJun 27, 2024 23:32:50 ago (+2/-2)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 2 points 11 monthsJun 28, 2024 00:17:29 ago (+3/-1)
The Agent Smith programming kicks in and I know this from personal experience. It was only a few years ago where I would call them retards and mock them and disregarded anything they would say.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 -2 points 11 monthsJun 28, 2024 01:20:21 ago (+2/-4)
No climate model. No model to explain night and day. No answers to challenges. Just rhetoric, and fear of 'professor dave explains'. Yes, I know he's not a 'real' professor, that's just the name of his channel. I know, being crushed by such a reddit douche must be so embarrassing.
Jack was the most intelligent of them all, and he made no direct flatter claims but couched his rhetoric as 'questioning'. As I recall, he was the only one who admitted to watching a professor dave video, but even he refused the challenge to produce credible models for what we see.
It's kind of a fascinating mental illness, because it's so contrary to the data our eyes and minds produce, yet they're unable to explain any of it. You'd think they'd notice that in themselves, but they don't.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 2 points 11 monthsJun 28, 2024 02:03:10 ago (+3/-1)*
You have faith in mainstream science, not knowledge, not facts. You have faith.
We all learnt the same jewish globe model. Only true free thinkers are able to break out of the brainwashing.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 11 monthsJun 28, 2024 02:09:49 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 2 points 11 monthsJun 28, 2024 03:13:50 ago (+3/-1)*
"Our solar system, including its family of planets, moon, asteroid, and comets, orbits around the center of the Milky Way galaxy at an average velocity of 828,000 km/hr or 143 mi/s (514,000 mph)"
Then we factor in the alleged speed of Earth around the sun which is 66,666 miles per hour. Then finally we arrive at the rotational speed of Earth which is 1000mph. This rotation is what supposedly causes the night and day cycle.
Then you disregard natural science, disregard your senses and submit to the authority figures that dictate that we don't experience any of this phenomena simply because of the scale in which it is taking place.
To explain how a sphere spinning at 1000mph, outputting centrifugal force, flinging objects away from it's core, is able to contain the plenum that allegedly resides within it's alleged atmosphere, you need the theory of gravity of course.
Oh shit wait, im regurgitating the nonsense you have FAITH in.
If you have "heard them all" as you claim then you should know of one of the many models that flat earth theorists have posited here many times before? Don't be so intellectually lazy. Do your own research instead of watching the faggot Professor Dave (who defends the existence of trannies. Not someone you should take scientific advice from) Professor Dave believes that women can have a penis.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpGqFUStcxc
Instead though I can guarantee you have just instantly disregarded them and flame the skeptical minded as an idiot or retarded.
That's how the Agent Smith programming works.
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull 2 points 11 monthsJun 27, 2024 21:00:03 ago (+2/-0)
There's a really good video on youtube that I can't find right now. The guy goes over ocean floor ridges and other evidence. He's fairly convincing.
[ + ] registereduser
[ - ] registereduser 8 points 11 monthsJun 27, 2024 18:31:20 ago (+8/-0)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 3 points 11 monthsJun 27, 2024 23:26:37 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod
[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 2 points 11 monthsJun 28, 2024 00:47:26 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] SilentByAssociation
[ - ] SilentByAssociation 3 points 11 monthsJun 27, 2024 22:50:58 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] absurdlyobfuscated
[ - ] absurdlyobfuscated 0 points 11 monthsJun 28, 2024 00:21:10 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod
[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 3 points 11 monthsJun 28, 2024 00:54:28 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic 0 points 11 monthsJun 28, 2024 01:43:48 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod
[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 0 points 11 monthsJun 28, 2024 03:12:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic 0 points 11 monthsJun 28, 2024 14:16:03 ago (+0/-0)
Anyway, thanks for the link.
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 0 points 11 monthsJun 28, 2024 02:41:44 ago (+0/-0)