I doubt they are real myself. But the idea of world destruction convinced people to tolerate evil. If an evil person has the capability of destroying the world, you have to tolerate them.
Edit: judging by the other comments, you are most likely right. You seem to be getting a lot of generic jdif responses. There are three subjects I know of that triggers this.
When have I ever aligned with jews?? I've warned about them for decades. You've never shown me one thing to make me think nukes are fake. All you do is screech that they're fake. That seems jewy to me.
Explain why jews would want you to believe they don't have the capability of destroying the world? Seems pretty counter productive if they want the world to fear an eminent threat enough to start WW3. So logically, no, jews would prefer you believe a button can destroy us all if we don't act. Accusing someone of getting paid by jews without explaining why that would even make any sense at all makes it seem like you are the jew accusing others of what you are guilty of. Being paid in shekels.
The presentation is primarily about regulatory assertion and how the government has misled the public about the danger of minor exposure events. I thought it was really interesting, he seems like a personable guy.
I was a reactor technician on a 688 submarine. I think his rhetoric surrounding the EPA and it's bureaucratic meddling in the science of reactor operation was excellent. He definitely has a point regarding about the absurdly low safe exposure limits and the amount of material the average human body can be exposed to without long-term damage but to verify some of the claims he made in the first part of the video, I'd have to reach out to an friend of mine who's a nuclear engineer. Like I said, I liked him and his approach and he seemed perfectly knowledgeable but it's important to understand that he's not saying it's not dangerous, he's saying it's not necessarily dangerous - particularly at the levels the US government has set through it's regulatory policy.
First, you didn't limit the consideration in your original post. Second, you displayed a profound lack of specificity in the words you did choose to use that led to the ambiguity in my reply. For example, the British empire no longer definably exists, and the UK that remains does not possess the United States in the way that you've inferred. It is more accurate to say that the United States serves Israeli interests as a tacit vassal State as the entirety of our foreign policy since the mid-90's has been in support of that nations regional interests, but that is a separate topic. I'm not sure what you think you're asking; nuclear material exists, nuclear reactors exist, and nuclear weaponry exists - we have physical stockpiles in places like Ft. Eustace Virginia and Groton Connecticut. Are you saying that the weaponry exists but is essentially inoperable due to the infeasibility of the technology necessary to instigate or control the reaction or are you saying the munitions exist but are conventional? I'm not 'really going to tell you' anything you would accept as valid via social media except to say that you need to stop talking like a leftist - next you'll be posting sentences like 'I think we can all agree', or 'Don't be that guy'... Believe in nuclear weapons or do not, it really doesn't matter either way.
Edward Teller came to my college back in the 80s. When students said it was a mistake to make hydrogen weapons because someday they would be used to kill billions of people. He said that won't happen because that would be irrational, thermonukes would never be used because it meant suicide for the users.
It was weird seeing teenage age girls explaining to this famous old genius that some people are crazy and would do it anyway because some are suicidal and homicidal.
It is weirder now to see all over internet saying stupid shit like this: it never occurred to the Genius or the little girls that people would deny the existence of nukes completely and then advocate violating boundaries that would lead to their use.
The next great selection event is when this happens.
[ + ] Lost_In_The_Thinking
[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 11 monthsJul 10, 2024 23:07:26 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 11 monthsJul 11, 2024 01:27:33 ago (+1/-1)*
Edit: judging by the other comments, you are most likely right. You seem to be getting a lot of generic jdif responses. There are three subjects I know of that triggers this.
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 11 monthsJul 10, 2024 23:06:04 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -1 points 11 monthsJul 11, 2024 09:50:48 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 11 monthsJul 11, 2024 19:26:33 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] NeedleStack
[ - ] NeedleStack 1 point 11 monthsJul 11, 2024 00:01:54 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 11 monthsJul 11, 2024 00:05:36 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] TheSimulacra
[ - ] TheSimulacra 2 points 11 monthsJul 10, 2024 23:31:31 ago (+2/-0)
Have you sacrificed your chicken yet this year?
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -1 points 11 monthsJul 11, 2024 09:19:15 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey
[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 3 points 11 monthsJul 10, 2024 22:41:42 ago (+4/-1)
[ + ] Indoctrinated_USA
[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 3 points 11 monthsJul 10, 2024 22:44:36 ago (+4/-1)
I've personally worked on a nuclear reactor.
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 1 point 11 monthsJul 11, 2024 01:53:22 ago (+1/-0)
https://archive.org/details/youtube-oQpAD8CPGSY
[ + ] Indoctrinated_USA
[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 0 points 11 monthsJul 11, 2024 16:11:55 ago (+0/-0)
I thought it was really interesting, he seems like a personable guy.
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 0 points 11 monthsJul 11, 2024 22:43:13 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Indoctrinated_USA
[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 0 points 11 monthsJul 11, 2024 23:50:30 ago (+0/-0)
I think his rhetoric surrounding the EPA and it's bureaucratic meddling in the science of reactor operation was excellent.
He definitely has a point regarding about the absurdly low safe exposure limits and the amount of material the average human body can be exposed to without long-term damage but to verify some of the claims he made in the first part of the video, I'd have to reach out to an friend of mine who's a nuclear engineer.
Like I said, I liked him and his approach and he seemed perfectly knowledgeable but it's important to understand that he's not saying it's not dangerous, he's saying it's not necessarily dangerous - particularly at the levels the US government has set through it's regulatory policy.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 11 monthsJul 10, 2024 23:52:45 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Indoctrinated_USA
[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 1 point 11 monthsJul 11, 2024 16:39:24 ago (+1/-0)*
Second, you displayed a profound lack of specificity in the words you did choose to use that led to the ambiguity in my reply.
For example, the British empire no longer definably exists, and the UK that remains does not possess the United States in the way that you've inferred. It is more accurate to say that the United States serves Israeli interests as a tacit vassal State as the entirety of our foreign policy since the mid-90's has been in support of that nations regional interests, but that is a separate topic.
I'm not sure what you think you're asking; nuclear material exists, nuclear reactors exist, and nuclear weaponry exists - we have physical stockpiles in places like Ft. Eustace Virginia and Groton Connecticut.
Are you saying that the weaponry exists but is essentially inoperable due to the infeasibility of the technology necessary to instigate or control the reaction or are you saying the munitions exist but are conventional?
I'm not 'really going to tell you' anything you would accept as valid via social media except to say that you need to stop talking like a leftist - next you'll be posting sentences like 'I think we can all agree', or 'Don't be that guy'...
Believe in nuclear weapons or do not, it really doesn't matter either way.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -1 points 11 monthsJul 11, 2024 09:44:47 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt -2 points 11 monthsJul 10, 2024 23:38:43 ago (+1/-3)
I've personally worked as a unicorn stable hand.
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 3 points 11 monthsJul 10, 2024 22:55:01 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted -1 points 11 monthsJul 10, 2024 23:55:17 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 11 monthsJul 11, 2024 00:15:37 ago (+1/-0)
Says the person who was banned for violating one of the very few rules on this website lol
Nah I don't get in everyone's business. I just don't like you for your mossad-like doxxing
[ + ] Osmanthus
[ - ] Osmanthus 3 points 11 monthsJul 10, 2024 23:41:03 ago (+3/-0)*
It was weird seeing teenage age girls explaining to this famous old genius that some people are crazy and would do it anyway because some are suicidal and homicidal.
It is weirder now to see all over internet saying stupid shit like this: it never occurred to the Genius or the little girls that people would deny the existence of nukes completely and then advocate violating boundaries that would lead to their use.
The next great selection event is when this happens.