All of Earths gasses in the atmos:
Nitrogen (N2): approximately 78%
Oxygen (O2): approximately 21%
Argon (Ar): trace amounts (about 0.93%)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2): variable amounts, currently around 0.04%
Water Vapor (H2O): variable amounts, typically up to 4% in the atmos
Other gases: trace amounts, including neon (Ne), helium (He), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and ozone (O3)
All of these are created at ground level and rise upwards into the atmos due to buoyant force and the 2nd law of thermodynamics. The denser the gas, the lower the altitude. Each gas settles into it's equilibrium at varying altitudes and this causes a vertical density gradient.
Earth is the largest and densest object in the universe, objects seek their density equilibrium which is downwards, gasses seek their buoyance equilibrium, which is upwards.
Gas pressure is the force exerted by gas molecules colliding with the surfaces of objects.
The theory of gravity is not a surface nor an object. It is a needless theory that exists to invoke the belief of living on a ball.
To demonstrate gas pressure in any scientific experiment it requires containment, a physical barrier.
Helium filled balloons are "anti-gravitational technology" or simply acting upon buoyant force. Why does the theory of gravity exist? To help kikes push heliocentrism.
Is it okay to ask questions or is that forbidden?
https://files.catbox.moe/mm0ygf.png![]()
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 3 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 07:49:04 ago (+5/-2)
[ + ] VitaminSieg
[ - ] VitaminSieg 6 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 10:18:24 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:10:00 ago (+5/-3)*
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 07:52:01 ago (+3/-2)*
https://byjus.com/buoyancy-calculator/
Lemme guess,
Note in the equation "g".
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 08:07:02 ago (+5/-3)*
The title is asking how the theory of gravity becomes a physical barrier that contains gas/atmos pressure.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:29:07 ago (+2/-2)
To answer the question posted here.
A slightly less perfect vaccuum can exist near a near vaccuum, and only needs a tiny amount of gravitational attraction to maintain equilibrium.
G = M1M2/d^2
G = Force due to gravitational attraction
= <- An equals sign - means the equation on both sides of this sign are of the same value
M1 = the mass of the earth
M2 = the mass of a particular
/ <- this is a division symbol. Probably where you are getting confused, cause maf is hard.
d = distance
^ <- what's the correct term for this? I forget. But "raised to the power of" may be another tripping point for you, cause maf is really hard.
2 = That's the number 2. Comes after 1 and before 3 on a scale of whole numbers.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:35:10 ago (+5/-3)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:39:29 ago (+2/-2)
Every time you run an equation with the gravitational constant, you are testing this equation.
Where did I suggest anything about a vacuum that needs to be tested?
This is saying that gravity at a slightly less near vaccuum can overcome the pull of a near vaccum using the force of gravity in the opposite direction, given the equation.
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior -1 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 12:11:40 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 16:30:48 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:41:10 ago (+4/-3)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:43:19 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 3 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:44:39 ago (+5/-2)
The "vacuum" your talking about breaks the second law of thermodynamics. It cannot exist because of what I just explained.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:49:50 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:58:19 ago (+4/-2)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 10:19:22 ago (+2/-2)
Fucking fantastic.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 10:33:45 ago (+4/-2)
No. It can't exist because there is no scientific ground for it to exist. That means that it has never been produced and nobody has any reason to believe it exists other than the fact that NASA tells you it exists.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:01:15 ago (+1/-1)
Let's assume that the chamber is a 1 foot cube and standard Pressure is 29.92 inches of mercury.
Yes. If you put a partially deflated balloon in the chamber and vacuumed "it out", the Ballon would expand. Presumably, it would expand to stretch the balloon to it popped or full the balloon took the shape of the cube.
Let me ask you this.
Would the balloons assume the shape of the cube at 29.90 inches of mercury or at some point closer to zero?
What would determine this?
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:05:35 ago (+2/-1)
If you had a chamber full of balloons, then vacuum the chamber, all the balloons will expand to occupy any empty space. The actual space inside the atoms is what's expanding. They is no such thing as empty space outside of an atom.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:09:44 ago (+1/-1)
Strawman.
Again, if I put a partially filled balloon into a chamber and lowered the pressure slightly, would the balloon stretch to the size of the container?
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:11:51 ago (+2/-1)
Lol. It's my argument. A strawman is if I make your argument.
If you only slightly vacuum it, then you left matter inside. That matter is occupying space. That space would not be available for the gasses inside the balloon to expand into.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:32:12 ago (+1/-1)
Yes. That's true. So, as the pressure lowers the Balloon would gradually expand, right?
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 08:06:17 ago (+4/-3)
[ + ] ZyklonDryCleaners
[ - ] ZyklonDryCleaners 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 10:17:02 ago (+3/-2)
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 10:21:11 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] DitchPig
[ - ] DitchPig 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:03:24 ago (+2/-2)
[ + ] ZyklonDryCleaners
[ - ] ZyklonDryCleaners 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:26:30 ago (+2/-1)
https://youtu.be/5YDXqdg0bBw?si=sXedhTKAf3mCtGxf
[ + ] DitchPig
[ - ] DitchPig 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:34:30 ago (+2/-2)
Cavendish experiment is a proven fake, just like foucault's pendulum.
[ + ] ZyklonDryCleaners
[ - ] ZyklonDryCleaners 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 12:17:59 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] DitchPig
[ - ] DitchPig 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 14:44:12 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] ZyklonDryCleaners
[ - ] ZyklonDryCleaners -1 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 15:04:34 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] DitchPig
[ - ] DitchPig 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 15:16:47 ago (+2/-0)
If you think that shit is science, you ar e probably retarded.
[ + ] ZyklonDryCleaners
[ - ] ZyklonDryCleaners -1 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 15:53:04 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] DitchPig
[ - ] DitchPig 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 16:03:14 ago (+2/-0)
You can look at that video, and call that bullshit "science"?
NPC is mad his world view is wrong.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 16:29:12 ago (+0/-0)
https://files.catbox.moe/lkcyvy.png
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 10:20:35 ago (+1/-0)
Haha. Relative to what, retard? Hmmm. The center of the earth? Weird.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 16:27:05 ago (+0/-0)
The Earth's density gradient does not mean that there is empty space the higher we go. It means that there are basketballs on the bottom and ping pong balls on the top. More ping pong balls can fit into a unit per volume than basketballs. That is the only difference between density.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 17:03:10 ago (+0/-0)
I already told you that I'm done with this shit. It's a waste of time. You and Ditchpig are wastes of time.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 17:12:16 ago (+0/-0)
I can't verify what it is, but I can verify that it is necessary.
If I were to speculate what it is, liquid hydrogen is diomagnetic. The water's above refers to liquid hydrogen that is being repelled by our magnetic field. It creates a lake-like surface. Since our magnetic field is repelling that, it creates a bubble that we exist in. Outside this bubble is probably super dense so that bubble is in penetrable. Like if you see a rocket, hit it, The rocket's not just going to explode. It will penetrate it but stop. Like shooting a bullet through ballistic gel.
Yet here you are again.
[ + ] DitchPig
[ - ] DitchPig -1 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:05:54 ago (+2/-3)
Keep up.
Where do you have to throw the word "center" in there? There is "center", it's not a ba'al.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 12:20:36 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] DitchPig
[ - ] DitchPig 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 14:43:16 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO -1 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 15:19:21 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] DitchPig
[ - ] DitchPig 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 15:21:38 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO -1 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 15:26:47 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Smedleys_Butler
[ - ] Smedleys_Butler 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:11:36 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 12:08:38 ago (+2/-2)
If the people that believe the jew education system believed in the scientific method they would not use communist tactics to attack flat earth people.
No scientist would care or emotionally overreact to someone coming up with new theories and testing them.
These coordinated Saul alynsky style attacks against flat earth make my question their motive.
You on the other hand provide non emotional reasoned out questions and answers only to be attacked by psychological fucked up jew tactics
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 16:35:14 ago (+0/-0)