×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
5

How does the theory of gravity explain gas pressure?

submitted by GetFuckedCunt to AskUpgoat 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 07:44:53 ago (+12/-7)     (AskUpgoat)

All of Earths gasses in the atmos:

Nitrogen (N2): approximately 78%
Oxygen (O2): approximately 21%
Argon (Ar): trace amounts (about 0.93%)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2): variable amounts, currently around 0.04%
Water Vapor (H2O): variable amounts, typically up to 4% in the atmos
Other gases: trace amounts, including neon (Ne), helium (He), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and ozone (O3)

All of these are created at ground level and rise upwards into the atmos due to buoyant force and the 2nd law of thermodynamics. The denser the gas, the lower the altitude. Each gas settles into it's equilibrium at varying altitudes and this causes a vertical density gradient.

Earth is the largest and densest object in the universe, objects seek their density equilibrium which is downwards, gasses seek their buoyance equilibrium, which is upwards.

Gas pressure is the force exerted by gas molecules colliding with the surfaces of objects.

The theory of gravity is not a surface nor an object. It is a needless theory that exists to invoke the belief of living on a ball.

To demonstrate gas pressure in any scientific experiment it requires containment, a physical barrier.

Helium filled balloons are "anti-gravitational technology" or simply acting upon buoyant force. Why does the theory of gravity exist? To help kikes push heliocentrism.

Is it okay to ask questions or is that forbidden?

https://files.catbox.moe/mm0ygf.png


85 comments block


[ - ] FacelessOne 3 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 07:49:04 ago (+5/-2)

You see particles called gravitons probably exist even though we can't prove it and they give matter the properties of gravity and that's why we don't need a container!

[ - ] VitaminSieg 6 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 10:18:24 ago (+6/-0)

That's like a sunken cost falacy. "It exists because the theory demands it as it fills the theory's holes." That's not a proof.

[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:10:00 ago (+5/-3)*

What prevents the buildup of gas pressure if gas is created infintely at ground level? Entropy. What does entropy cause? Thunderstorms. What do thunderstorms do? Lower atmos/gas pressure. How often do thunderstorms occur internationally per day on average? Roughly 40,000.

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 07:52:01 ago (+3/-2)*

I thought buoyancy explains how gasses rise above heavier gasses.

https://byjus.com/buoyancy-calculator/

Lemme guess,

joo mafs

Note in the equation "g".

[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 08:07:02 ago (+5/-3)*

Explain the theory of "g" numbskull.

The title is asking how the theory of gravity becomes a physical barrier that contains gas/atmos pressure.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:29:07 ago (+2/-2)

I was answering this question.

Helium filled balloons are "anti-gravitational technology" or simply acting upon buoyant force. Why does the theory of gravity exist?

To answer the question posted here.

A slightly less perfect vaccuum can exist near a near vaccuum, and only needs a tiny amount of gravitational attraction to maintain equilibrium.

G = M1M2/d^2

G = Force due to gravitational attraction
= <- An equals sign - means the equation on both sides of this sign are of the same value
M1 = the mass of the earth
M2 = the mass of a particular
/ <- this is a division symbol. Probably where you are getting confused, cause maf is hard.
d = distance
^ <- what's the correct term for this? I forget. But "raised to the power of" may be another tripping point for you, cause maf is really hard.
2 = That's the number 2. Comes after 1 and before 3 on a scale of whole numbers.

[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:35:10 ago (+5/-3)

Theoretical math equations arent proof without observable, repeatable testing. Can you showcase a vacuum without physical containment to prove your hypothesis?

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:39:29 ago (+2/-2)

without observable, repeatable testing

Every time you run an equation with the gravitational constant, you are testing this equation.

Where did I suggest anything about a vacuum that needs to be tested?

A slightly less perfect vaccuum can exist near a near vaccuum, and only needs a tiny amount of gravitational attraction to maintain equilibrium.

This is saying that gravity at a slightly less near vaccuum can overcome the pull of a near vaccum using the force of gravity in the opposite direction, given the equation.

[ - ] Doglegwarrior -1 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 12:11:40 ago (+1/-2)

Has any one done this at any scale? They do weird shit at high temperatures and pressures I wonder if their is any way to make a vacuum with out a hard container? Is it even theoretically possible

[ - ] McNasty 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 16:30:48 ago (+0/-0)

They have done as many tests as they possibly could terrestrially and determined that gravity and temperature has no effect on gases seeking higher entropy.

[ - ] McNasty 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:41:10 ago (+4/-3)

If you stick a partially deflated balloon in a vacuum chamber and then vacuum the chamber out, the balloon will expand and fill all available space. This is how gasses behave in a vacuum. There is no scientific grounds to claim that gasses will act different in a vacuum if the vacuum is not on earth.

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:43:19 ago (+2/-1)

Gasses within the pull of gravity aren't in a vacuum, dum dum.

[ - ] McNasty 3 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:44:39 ago (+5/-2)

aren't in a vacuum

The "vacuum" your talking about breaks the second law of thermodynamics. It cannot exist because of what I just explained.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:49:50 ago (+1/-1)

What "vaccuum" am I talking about?

[ - ] McNasty 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 09:58:19 ago (+4/-2)

The "near perfect vacuum of space." It can't exist next to the Earth's atmosphere because space is fake and gay and Idea that empty space exists between particles is a retard claim without any scientific ground to stand on.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 10:19:22 ago (+2/-2)

it can't exist because it don't exist.

Fucking fantastic.

[ - ] McNasty 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 10:33:45 ago (+4/-2)

Fucking fantastic.

No. It can't exist because there is no scientific ground for it to exist. That means that it has never been produced and nobody has any reason to believe it exists other than the fact that NASA tells you it exists.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:01:15 ago (+1/-1)

Ok, let's look at this.

Let's assume that the chamber is a 1 foot cube and standard Pressure is 29.92 inches of mercury.

Yes. If you put a partially deflated balloon in the chamber and vacuumed "it out", the Ballon would expand. Presumably, it would expand to stretch the balloon to it popped or full the balloon took the shape of the cube.

Let me ask you this.

Would the balloons assume the shape of the cube at 29.90 inches of mercury or at some point closer to zero?

What would determine this?

[ - ] McNasty 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:05:35 ago (+2/-1)

Gass expands to fill the chamber. That is the law.

If you had a chamber full of balloons, then vacuum the chamber, all the balloons will expand to occupy any empty space. The actual space inside the atoms is what's expanding. They is no such thing as empty space outside of an atom.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:09:44 ago (+1/-1)

If you had a chamber full of balloons

Strawman.

Again, if I put a partially filled balloon into a chamber and lowered the pressure slightly, would the balloon stretch to the size of the container?

[ - ] McNasty 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:11:51 ago (+2/-1)

Strawman

Lol. It's my argument. A strawman is if I make your argument.

Again, if I put a partially filled balloon into a chamber and lowered the pressure slightly, would the balloon stretch to the size of the container?

If you only slightly vacuum it, then you left matter inside. That matter is occupying space. That space would not be available for the gasses inside the balloon to expand into.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:32:12 ago (+1/-1)

"Strawman" is often a simple way of saying, "Hey, you stupid fucking faggot, your arguing a point that I never made."

If you only slightly vacuum it, then you left matter inside. That matter is occupying space. That space would not be available for the gasses inside the balloon to expand into.

Yes. That's true. So, as the pressure lowers the Balloon would gradually expand, right?

[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 08:06:17 ago (+4/-3)

[ - ] ZyklonDryCleaners 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 10:17:02 ago (+3/-2)

Bodies of mass exert gravity on each other. The pressure in the atmosphere at any given altitude is the result of the weight of however much atmosphere is sitting on top of it. A single square inch of atmosphere that extends all the way up to outer space exerts ~14.7 pounds on Earth's surface at sea level. Temperature can also change atmospheric pressure.

[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 10:21:11 ago (+1/-1)

Thank you.

[ - ] DitchPig 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:03:24 ago (+2/-2)

Please post your experiment that proves any attraction exists between two masses.

[ - ] ZyklonDryCleaners 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:26:30 ago (+2/-1)

[ - ] DitchPig 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:34:30 ago (+2/-2)

Yeah, let's have an actual, repeatable experiment that adheres to the Scientific Method, please.

Cavendish experiment is a proven fake, just like foucault's pendulum.

[ - ] ZyklonDryCleaners 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 12:17:59 ago (+3/-1)

The Cavendish experiment is literally repeated in the countless videos related to the one I shared here. You're asserting that it is invalid, but if you can't articulate why and how it is invalid, why should any lurkers in here accept your position as valid?

[ - ] DitchPig 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 14:44:12 ago (+2/-0)

lol, be more absurd. Does that video look like a scientific experiment to you?

[ - ] ZyklonDryCleaners -1 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 15:04:34 ago (+0/-1)

I don't think you know what a scientific experiment is. It's a test. And in this case it's testing whether the lead masses will move toward each other, and they do. Because of gravity. This really isn't difficult.

[ - ] DitchPig 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 15:16:47 ago (+2/-0)

They do because of the way the cable is braided. Look at all the wobble, and imparted momentum.

If you think that shit is science, you ar e probably retarded.

[ - ] ZyklonDryCleaners -1 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 15:53:04 ago (+0/-1)

Nothing would convince you because your parents probably didn't validate you enough as a retarded child and you developed oppositional defiant disorder. I'm sorry it must be painful to go through life with the IQ of a jew nigger incest baby.

[ - ] DitchPig 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 16:03:14 ago (+2/-0)

lol, actual science would convince me.

You can look at that video, and call that bullshit "science"?

NPC is mad his world view is wrong.

[ - ] McNasty 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 16:29:12 ago (+0/-0)

You can't tell anybody about how gravity works until you explain the contradiction in this picture.

https://files.catbox.moe/lkcyvy.png

[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 10:20:35 ago (+1/-0)

objects seek their density equilibrium which is downwards

Haha. Relative to what, retard? Hmmm. The center of the earth? Weird.

[ - ] McNasty 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 16:27:05 ago (+0/-0)

Relative to each other retard. There is no such thing as empty space. This is proved with a vacuum chamber and a balloon. If you put a balloon in a vacuum chamber and then vacuum the chamber, The balloon will expand to fill all empty space. It does this immediately and there is never any empty space that exists.

The Earth's density gradient does not mean that there is empty space the higher we go. It means that there are basketballs on the bottom and ping pong balls on the top. More ping pong balls can fit into a unit per volume than basketballs. That is the only difference between density.

[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 17:03:10 ago (+0/-0)

And its a big dome holding it all in, right.

I already told you that I'm done with this shit. It's a waste of time. You and Ditchpig are wastes of time.

[ - ] McNasty 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 17:12:16 ago (+0/-0)

And its a big dome holding it all in, right.

I can't verify what it is, but I can verify that it is necessary.

If I were to speculate what it is, liquid hydrogen is diomagnetic. The water's above refers to liquid hydrogen that is being repelled by our magnetic field. It creates a lake-like surface. Since our magnetic field is repelling that, it creates a bubble that we exist in. Outside this bubble is probably super dense so that bubble is in penetrable. Like if you see a rocket, hit it, The rocket's not just going to explode. It will penetrate it but stop. Like shooting a bullet through ballistic gel.

I already told you that I'm done with this shit.

Yet here you are again.

[ - ] DitchPig -1 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:05:54 ago (+2/-3)

The Earth.

Keep up.

Where do you have to throw the word "center" in there? There is "center", it's not a ba'al.

[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 12:20:36 ago (+1/-1)

Right, because we live in a really tall tube. The cosmos is a tube.

[ - ] DitchPig 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 14:43:16 ago (+2/-0)

Why are you so stuck?

[ - ] CHIRO -1 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 15:19:21 ago (+0/-1)

Do you know how hard it is having to wrap your mind around retardation? It's tough when you aren't retarded.

[ - ] DitchPig 2 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 15:21:38 ago (+2/-0)

You are programmed, that's why you can't conceive of anything outside of your paradigm/instruction set.

[ - ] CHIRO -1 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 15:26:47 ago (+0/-1)

Not even close, man. It just doesn't make sense. That's all there is to it.

[ - ] Smedleys_Butler 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 11:11:36 ago (+2/-1)

/slide

[ - ] Doglegwarrior 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 12:08:38 ago (+2/-2)

Your last statement is one of the reasons I lean towards flat eather over globe

If the people that believe the jew education system believed in the scientific method they would not use communist tactics to attack flat earth people.

No scientist would care or emotionally overreact to someone coming up with new theories and testing them.

These coordinated Saul alynsky style attacks against flat earth make my question their motive.

You on the other hand provide non emotional reasoned out questions and answers only to be attacked by psychological fucked up jew tactics

[ - ] McNasty 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 16:35:14 ago (+0/-0)

It's definitely a big deal to jews. They didn't have a problem with people saying that NASA faked the Apollo missions back when we were speculating about aliens. But now that the flat Earth is the possible reason the Apollo missions were faked, all of a sudden NASA is credible.