[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 16:05:07 ago (+1/-0)
But near the village of Nizhniy Klin (5-6 kilometers from the border) the column of the Ukrainian Armed Forces was ambushed and destroyed. Most of the armored vehicles were left to burn after artillery and air strikes. The remnants of the Ukrainian army may be hiding in the forests near the border.
Literally every article he posts is pro Russia. America bad, the west bad, Russia good. So looks like a shit source. Probably more biased than Russia Today
Do you have an update on this invasion from a source that you trust? Where are these 1000 troops, right now? How many of what vehicles? It would seem Russia would suggest that they are either destroyed or decimated. Can you show otherwise?
Please reference their previous attempt at "gaining combat experience" in 1979. They lost to the Vietnamese.
I'm also old enough to remember when the PLA attempted to "gain combat experience" in Sudan too. They abandoned their weapons and ran away.
One of the problems of sending troops into another country's territory, ostensibly to demonstrate support, to support their operations, and "gain combat experience", is interoperability. Language barrier, radio communications interoperability, separate chain of command blurring the basic military principle of "unity of command", are all a recipe for disaster.
So the only "combat experience" they'll "gain" is sitting inside the Russian logistical support bases guarding the perimeter.
Just as the Europeans did in Afghanistan. The German contingent sat inside the wire in Mazar E Sharif for 3 years and got fat. They never conducted a single combat operation in 3 years. That was their, "combat experience".
The French DID leave the wire once. Once. And lost a whole platoon because they only had one radio, and nobody could talk to them. That was their, "combat experience".
Even a simple thing like different uniforms and weapon calibers.
And we're right back to logistics again.
Chinese small arms have not been compatible with Russian small arms ammunition for years now. How will the Russians support them logistically? And if not, then how will the chinese, who are entirely lacking in long range logistical support units in their TO&E, support those units in combat?
You can't just hang a unit out in the breeze like that and hope for the best.
Unless the experience you're looking for is getting slaughtered.
I've done this dance for over 30 years and on 4 different continents sunshine. You can either learn or not. I care not which.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 16:05:07 ago (+1/-0)
@sal_180
How is this source?
[ + ] Sal_180
[ - ] Sal_180 0 points 10 monthsAug 10, 2024 11:22:40 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 10, 2024 11:57:02 ago (+0/-0)
Just asking. I actually want to know.
[ + ] Sal_180
[ - ] Sal_180 0 points 10 monthsAug 10, 2024 20:09:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 10, 2024 21:14:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sal_180
[ - ] Sal_180 0 points 10 monthsAug 12, 2024 01:34:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] WanderingToast
[ - ] WanderingToast 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 19:27:18 ago (+0/-0)
This would be a great way to do that without causing any diplomatic headaches. Chinese army already not far away in belarus
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 10 monthsAug 10, 2024 12:48:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] WanderingToast
[ - ] WanderingToast 0 points 10 monthsAug 11, 2024 17:33:44 ago (+0/-0)
They want their troops to gain combat experience.
They (China) sent troops to Belarus to train with soldiers fresh off rotation from front line.
Sending trooos into Ukraine is too messy, but fighting inside allied nation Russia with invite...not messy at all
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper [op] 0 points 10 monthsAug 11, 2024 18:03:20 ago (+0/-0)
I'm also old enough to remember when the PLA attempted to "gain combat experience" in Sudan too.
They abandoned their weapons and ran away.
One of the problems of sending troops into another country's territory, ostensibly to demonstrate support, to support their operations, and "gain combat experience", is interoperability. Language barrier, radio communications interoperability, separate chain of command blurring the basic military principle of "unity of command", are all a recipe for disaster.
So the only "combat experience" they'll "gain" is sitting inside the Russian logistical support bases guarding the perimeter.
Just as the Europeans did in Afghanistan. The German contingent sat inside the wire in Mazar E Sharif for 3 years and got fat. They never conducted a single combat operation in 3 years. That was their, "combat experience".
The French DID leave the wire once. Once. And lost a whole platoon because they only had one radio, and nobody could talk to them. That was their, "combat experience".
Even a simple thing like different uniforms and weapon calibers.
And we're right back to logistics again.
Chinese small arms have not been compatible with Russian small arms ammunition for years now. How will the Russians support them logistically? And if not, then how will the chinese, who are entirely lacking in long range logistical support units in their TO&E, support those units in combat?
You can't just hang a unit out in the breeze like that and hope for the best.
Unless the experience you're looking for is getting slaughtered.
I've done this dance for over 30 years and on 4 different continents sunshine. You can either learn or not. I care not which.
[ + ] Deplorablepoetry
[ - ] Deplorablepoetry 0 points 10 monthsAug 9, 2024 18:37:11 ago (+0/-0)
Kike war here and there
Atrocity unfounded
Soon the eagle meets the bear