×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
23

How White Genocide/multiracialism is unconstitutional and can be overturned nationwide with a single Federal judge

submitted by oppressed to IdeasToSaveWhites 9 monthsAug 27, 2024 10:12:13 ago (+23/-0)     (IdeasToSaveWhites)



Multiracialism is inhumane treatment by the state since Blacks are 35 times more likely to attack Whites than the other way around. Laws which force integrate the races are harmful and can therefore be overturned by a Federal court, as they violate the Due Process Clause and the Cruel and Unusual Punishment clause of the constitution.

A Federal court has the power to rule a law to be unconstitutional and have the law overturned.

The government is obligated not to harm its citizens. This obligation is rooted in several constitutional principles and legal precedents:

Due Process Clause: The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments ensure that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. This means the government must follow fair procedures and cannot arbitrarily harm individuals.

Equal Protection Clause: The Fourteenth Amendment also requires that all citizens receive equal protection under the law. This clause prevents the government from discriminating against individuals or groups.

Cruel and Unusual Punishment: The Eighth Amendment prohibits the government from inflicting cruel and unusual punishment. This protects individuals from inhumane treatment by the state.

Habeas Corpus: The right to habeas corpus ensures that individuals cannot be detained unlawfully and must be brought before a court to determine the legality of their detention.

These principles collectively ensure that the government is held accountable for protecting the rights and well-being of its citizens.

Blacks are 35 times
more likely to attack Whites than the other way around. That means forced integration of White with Blacks violates the Due Process Clause and the Cruel and Unusual Punishment clause. Multiracialism is inhumane treatment by the state and must be overturned.

Video proof: https://old.bitchute.com/video/tD9C72AIpnnj/?list=4ivaVzZHY1ra&randomize=false

Graph: https://i.redd.it/vsyli1xsic151.jpg

Here are more ways in which multiracialism/White Genocide violates those constitutional principles:

1) Diversity destroys the host race, Whites, through a process known as genetic swamping/White Genocide.

"Naturalists want to keep the two types of crocodile apart so as to avoid genetic swamping.

But White people, if you care about their survival, you're a 'Nazi.'"

Jared Taylor explains this in DO WHITE PEOPLE HAVE A FUTURE:

https://odysee.com/@Western_Detach:8/jtdwphafs:9

2) Diversity changes the culture, media, and government into a mish-mash of alien races and thoughts which are often harmful and antipathetic to the host race, Whites.

3) With diversity and colorblind anti-racism, Whites get wrongfully blamed and victimized for any disparate outcomes between races.

Examples of victimization Whites go through:

Constant Media harassment of pro-Whites, race realists, White Nationalists, Nick Fuentes, etc. That is in stark contrast to the media's constant promotion and high appraisals of non-White leaders and anti-White ideas.

4) Diversity causes limitless destruction of property through violent negro riots. If Whites combat such riots they are propagandized as "racist White Supremacist bigot nazis." (List a history of property damage from negro riots here.)

5) Diversity causes a crisis of poverty and unemployment through a dysgenic multiracial racemixed shared destiny. The world needs lots of pure and healthy White DNA to produce its bountiful breadbaskets for Africans and others, who would starve without White support.

6) Now you folks can add more

We White Nationalists, with the help of some lawyers, could get a single old White Federal judge somewhere to agree that massive genetic swamping of non-Whites/diversity causes these listed problems for Whites, and therefore it is unconstitutional. Judges love to rule things unconstitutional, that's the most powerful legal argument there is.




14 comments block


[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 9 monthsAug 27, 2024 10:30:16 ago (+2/-0)

You aren't understanding this.

You can't change a democrat cult member. THe Manson girls sat in jail for decades believing they were morally and intellectually superior and nothing could erase that.
They had the moral superiority of eco warrior verbal preaching and unimpeachable righteousness over it.

They wanted a race against their own race and thought all the blacks would love and admire them.

Their enemy was all everyone stopping them from being admired, so for democrats it will always be all Whites who disagree with them that they want dead.

THey think jihad is fundamentalism, only a few in error that they're going to love and change. THey actually think islam isn't here to conquer by the sword, but be their neighbour and admire them.

The Blacks will stop being violent once they're all made rich.

The cartels don't like getting rich. They really just want jobs.

For everyone who says the kids in school are wise, they're only talking about a rare case that stood out. The schools are turning out nothing but mentally abused fuck ups this year last year and next year.

There is no going back.

They don't care what a judge says. They're going to keep taking your job and your money and bundling non Whites into the country any way they can.

So what if trump gets another four years. It changed nothing in the crazy democrats. They're still a huge amount of voters

There's only way to save anything.

[ - ] NuckFiggers 2 points 9 monthsAug 27, 2024 16:56:18 ago (+2/-0)

This is what I think about. The democrats are a cult. You can see this in many ways, particularly how they call all Trumpfags a cult. It's projection. But the ideals and the beliefs of leftists don't stand up to rational thought so they have to enforce them through fear of ostracization, which is what the Manson family did, which is what the People's Temple did (both leftist btw).

You can take people out of a cult but they never leave them. The Manson family members either traded that cult for a different one or they are still stuck in it decades later.

This leftist, nigger loving, child fucking system going on now will end eventually but everyone in it will stay as nigger lovers and child fuckers for the rest of their lives. It's not like a biker gang where you can get your colors ripped off or even cut off your skin and you're done- cults change your brain completely and they are lost forever.

[ - ] Equalizer 1 point 9 monthsAug 27, 2024 22:01:29 ago (+1/-0)

The democrats are a cult. You can see this in many ways, particularly how they call all Trumpfags a cult.

They deliberately go out of their way to make macro-scale accusations and call anyone voting for Trump/right-wing being in a cult to fulfill one of their Rules for Radicals bullet points: Accuse Others of your own Sins.

The amount of left behaving like NPC lemmings, vote blue no matter who, dwarf any extreme boomer Trumptards.

They think they if they "do it first" or keep doing it they can't be called a cult.

[ - ] NuckFiggers 1 point 9 monthsAug 28, 2024 00:07:28 ago (+1/-0)

And how they think of radicals but they follow the people that have been in charge for the last twenty or so years. They are status quo.

[ - ] con77 2 points 9 monthsAug 27, 2024 11:27:21 ago (+2/-0)

Socrates said 2500 years ago that multicultural societies were doomed to fail.

[ - ] Sector2 4 points 9 monthsAug 27, 2024 11:30:29 ago (+4/-0)

Laws and 'legalities' are simply a mask for the rulers.

[ - ] SecretHitler 3 points 9 monthsAug 27, 2024 11:43:45 ago (+3/-0)

Politics is theater and OP doesn't understand this.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 1 point 9 monthsAug 27, 2024 12:19:37 ago (+1/-0)

the law exists

You imbecile.

[ - ] Crackinjokes 2 points 9 monthsAug 27, 2024 12:57:31 ago (+2/-0)

I actually believe that the freedom of association guaranteed by the Constitution is the way to prevent forced immigration in the workplace or at home or anywhere else. There's no exception to freedom of association for work places or other things. Any laws made contrary to allowing anybody complete freedom of association with whoever they want as well as freedom of not associating with whoever they want is against that constitutional principle.

[ - ] registereduser -1 points 9 monthsAug 27, 2024 15:57:01 ago (+0/-1)

Yes, discuss it harder, vote harder, cry like a bitch on the internet harder, meme harder, geek out on the written word harder, faggot.

Until you grow up, grow some balls and stand up like a man and take some real action, you will continue to get fucked in the ass like the bitch you are.

[ - ] oppressed [op] 0 points 9 monthsAug 27, 2024 17:22:39 ago (+0/-0)

Laws causing multiracialism deprive White people of life, and arbitrarily harm Whites. This violates The Due Process Clause.

[ - ] TexasVet 0 points 9 monthsAug 27, 2024 17:27:11 ago (+0/-0)

I posted this on X in the hopes that someone with a law degree might see it.

https://x.com/sesweat/status/1828544427734057259

[ - ] LawFag 0 points 9 monthsAug 27, 2024 19:03:03 ago (+0/-0)

So, law school is hard for a reason. It is going to be very difficult for someone to just google random shit and understand how everything works, it's all very nuanced. The lynchpin of your argument really doesn't exist, because when you are talking about all of these things: Due Process, the 14th Amendment, Equal Protection etc., those things all apply to government action. Feral africans are not the government, thus, none of these constitutional provisions apply to the activity you are describing. There is no constitutional right to be safe, there is no constitutional right to not have problems.

Your appeal needs to be a religious one, not a constitutional one. Jesus was racist as fuck, just look at how he treated the canaanite (jew) woman in Matthew 15. Noah was spared because he had a pure bloodline, Genesis 6. God says to appoint a king and not set a foreigner over us in Deuteronomy 17. Every time God gives land to his people he says to drive out the natives and not let anyone else in.

Though, the ironic thing, is that the one authority that holds enough power to actually make any change (the church) has been completely infiltrated by satan and the retards who actually still go to church believing they are Christians would just straight up deny the word of God.

Revelation is the ultimate black pill. The saints lose in the end, there's no overcoming anything at this point.

[ - ] oppressed [op] 0 points 9 monthsAug 28, 2024 05:02:00 ago (+0/-0)

thanks for your feedback. i think there is a constitutional right for the government not to harm citizens.

while blacks arent the government, they are force integrated by the government. thus the constitutional provisions must apply imo