If you track what he is saying, put it down on paper, then draw out the logic diagram for what he is saying, you are left with the realization that he actually isn't saying anything.
This idea was carried forward in the title, but his actual argument was ... null. Nothing of what he is saying has any connecting premise to any other conclusions he was making.
I mean to start off on respectful footing here. I realize I did not confirm some of your points properly when trying to articulate what I was (It's kind of hard without verbal or a faster medium). Let me see if I can show by taking your last statement and drawing it out ...
Premise 1: The reason screens are blue lit is because ... that original technology was developed in a program that bobby kennedy knows about and I happen to know about ... because I went to medical school at LSU.
You see what I mean by "no argument"?
Now, the blue screen thing may be blue for some reason, but if you take an engineering course in heat transfer literally 1/3 of it is in "radiation". The premise of light/color in this field show the COLORS emitted actually have to do with filment temperatures. The "blue" spectrum allows (assuming an inductive load in your vision) the appearance of a full spectrum and offsets that browny/yellowy tone that other light sources would emit.
I like the engineering premise already.
Now, that said staring at the screen FUCKS UP YOUR WHOLE SYSTEM and the LEDs are far worse, especially at higher refresh frequencies. Our visual system is like a low pass filter, because the higher frequencies attenuate the shit out of it and cause most blood flow to the brain to be used up in the visual area. This leaves your frontal lobe without blood, hence leaves the person without supervisory functions.
This guy's "arguments" lead you away from the evidence above. It's all a simpler mechanism, getting hypnotized that is. Best advice, use a screen far away from you. Don't jack up high frequency+high amplitude and stand close to the screen. Smart phones are even worse because you have to zoom your vision hard to see the screen.
Yes. He's stated what I can already find is true. But his argument getting there is full of garbage. If you show that to a real scientist, they'll shut you down. That is because he constructs no proper argument (links things in a seemingly random manner, or without basis). Show them what I showed you, and they'll let you talk further.
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 0 points 7 monthsSep 10, 2024 09:19:08 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer [op] 0 points 7 monthsSep 10, 2024 15:11:24 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 0 points 7 monthsSep 10, 2024 15:16:01 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer [op] 0 points 7 monthsSep 10, 2024 15:23:57 ago (+0/-0)
If not then maybe you could track what he is saying, put it down on paper, then draw out the logic diagram for what he is missing out.
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 0 points 7 monthsSep 10, 2024 15:43:17 ago (+0/-0)
Premise 1: The reason screens are blue lit is because ... that original technology was developed in a program that bobby kennedy knows about and I happen to know about ... because I went to medical school at LSU.
You see what I mean by "no argument"?
Now, the blue screen thing may be blue for some reason, but if you take an engineering course in heat transfer literally 1/3 of it is in "radiation". The premise of light/color in this field show the COLORS emitted actually have to do with filment temperatures. The "blue" spectrum allows (assuming an inductive load in your vision) the appearance of a full spectrum and offsets that browny/yellowy tone that other light sources would emit.
I like the engineering premise already.
Now, that said staring at the screen FUCKS UP YOUR WHOLE SYSTEM and the LEDs are far worse, especially at higher refresh frequencies. Our visual system is like a low pass filter, because the higher frequencies attenuate the shit out of it and cause most blood flow to the brain to be used up in the visual area. This leaves your frontal lobe without blood, hence leaves the person without supervisory functions.
This guy's "arguments" lead you away from the evidence above. It's all a simpler mechanism, getting hypnotized that is. Best advice, use a screen far away from you. Don't jack up high frequency+high amplitude and stand close to the screen. Smart phones are even worse because you have to zoom your vision hard to see the screen.
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer [op] 0 points 7 monthsSep 11, 2024 06:58:23 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 0 points 7 monthsSep 11, 2024 10:14:59 ago (+0/-0)