Sign into an existing account

I really do wonder if we should be building nuclear bomb shelters in our backyard. I mean it does seem like it's getting pretty close now and it does seem more importantly like they're definitely going to continue to push it until it happens.

russia should in that case fire some missiles in the direction of the UK

What kind of cuck war is this? A country needs another country's permission to fire weapons at their enemy?

Bitch if I'm at war, I'm throwing every rock I've got at your head until your mangled body stops twitching.

So the UK has decided that London would be a good trade for Kiev?

Typical stupid clownworld globohomopedo excuse for a foreign policy.
"Kick the dog until he bites." Because that's worked so well in the past, right?

Actually, considering the number of dirt squirrels currently infesting London, have at it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fK1ZnFZ2dgI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGWKEYbwvyA

Now imagine those scenes superimposed on London.

UK: "Russia just shot at us! I'm invoking Article 5!"

US: "Ummm... yeeeaaahhh, about that..."

"The cupboard is bare" - Old Mother Hubbard

Putin:
“There is an attempt to substitute concepts. Because we are not talking about allowing or prohibiting the Kiev regime to strike at Russian territory. It is already striking with the help of unmanned aerial vehicles and other means. But when it comes to using high–precision long-range Western-made weapons, it’s a completely different story. The fact is that, as I have already said, and any experts will confirm this (both here and in the West), the Ukrainian army is not able to strike with modern high-precision long-range systems of Western production. It can’t do that. This is possible only with the use of satellite data, which Ukraine does not have — this is data only from satellites of either the European Union or the United States, in general, from NATO satellites. This is the first one."

“The second, and very important, perhaps key, is that flight missions to these missile systems can, in fact, only be carried out by military personnel of NATO countries. Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. And therefore, it is not a question of allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not to allow it. It’s about deciding whether NATO countries are directly involved in a military conflict or not. If this decision is made, it will mean nothing more than the direct participation of NATO countries, the United States, and European countries in the war in Ukraine. This is their direct involvement.

“And this, of course, significantly changes the very essence, the very nature of the conflict. This will mean that NATO countries, the United States, and European countries are at war with Russia. And if this is the case, then, bearing in mind the change in the very essence of this conflict, we will make appropriate decisions based on the threats that will be created to us.”

Jingo like its 1853!

For every UK missile fired at Russia, Russia should fire a 'Satan II' at the kings palace and residences.