That doesnt always work though, ive showed these type of videos to my normie "friends" and they just brush it off as .."oh, their just extremist, not all jews are like that or believe that"
That's the sect that trump's kid married and is larry fink of blackrock.
It doesn't really matter which sect, because it all has the same source, their sick and twisted books like the talmud, the book of tanya and the lurian kaballa.
Surprised you guys don’t know this stuff but I live in a kikey state.
Based on these verses, devout male jews bind these leather boxes to their head and arms while the “daven” (pray spastically) They contain verses of Torah on scraps of paper.
And it shall be for a sign for you upon your hand, and for a memorial between your eyes, that the law of the LORD may be in your mouth; for with a strong hand did the LORD bring you out of Egypt.— Exodus 13:9
And it shall be for a sign upon your hand, and as totafot between your eyes; for with a mighty hand did the LORD bring us forth out of Egypt.— Exodus 13:16
And you shall bind them as a sign upon your arm, and they shall be as totafot between your eyes.— Deuteronomy 6:8
You shall put these words of mine on your heart and on your soul; and you shall tie them for a sign upon your arm, and they shall be as totafot between your eyes.— Deuteronomy 11:18
Who knows what the fuck the bible is talking about. But they think its these little boxes with verses inside.
[ - ] dass 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 17:40:08 ago (+0/-0)
Isnt draven (they also do it during regular study and at the wailing wall) to produce a hypnotic-like trance state with the intention of being closer to god and simulating orgasmic ecstasy - Kabbalistic sex with god.
a) Ones perception implies left/right + up/down + front/back aka from within a caaba/ka'bah/ka'b - "cube".
b) Suggestion tempts one to ignore perception, hence ignorance representing the black shroud over the cube of perception.
c) Consenting (want OR not want) to a suggestion establishes a conflict of reason (want VERSUS not want) aka circular logic within ones mind/memory aka around ones shrouded cube of ignored perception.
d) Consenting to a suggestion implies religion/religio - "to bind anew", hence ones choice binding itself to a chosen ones suggestion.
e) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squaring_the_circle ...that's the foundation of your dancing muslims. And this... https://media1.jpc.de/image/w600/front/0/5099748724526.jpg')" class="expand" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squaring_the_circle">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squaring_the_circle ...that's the foundation of your dancing muslims. And this... https://media1.jpc.de/image/w600/front/0/5099748724526.jpg">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squaring_the_circle">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squaring_the_circle ...that's the foundation of your dancing muslims. And this... https://media1.jpc.de/image/w600/front/0/5099748724526.jpg aka Die Quadratur des Kreises (squaring the circle) shows an album cover (cube of perception) and the CD/LP within (circular reasoning), which is how a jew enters and tames the minds (entertainment) of gentiles by inverting it...circling the square aka KIKE the KA'BAH...
Anyway...how would you describe the origin of cube and circle?
You mean generally? An artifact of human cognition. I mean one can arise naturally of course but usually we go around making them because they have a cognitive significance
So an artifice shaped by human cognition of natural...what is holding artificial shapes together?
I mean one can arise naturally
a) Does meaning arise naturally or could meaning be artificial?
b) What if one can only arise (life) during loss (inception towards death)?
we go around making them
How does one shape a cube while going AROUND like a circle?
because they have a cognitive significance
Does nature make "marks of identification" aka signs? Do few control many with artificial marks of identification? Without significance shaped artificially, what would real nature be perceived as?
What is the first natural significance/sign a human recognizes?
Well that made me violent. I had to punch my couch a bunch to get it out of system. They are goblins. Not anything resembling God's people. They must be destroyed. Set on fire. Their ashes used for road building materials.
They want to kill White Europeans. The christian bit is a secondary expression. You saw this in Russia after the coup. You see it in the stated aims of the Frankfurt school. 2/3 of the world's christians are third world shitskins. That's called 'low hanging fruit'.
No they don't, what they want is far more sinister. They want whites and all others that would oppose them to be bred from existence.
It's working too. People in general are not able to see past the immediate, and if you haven't been looking around, whites are the minority by a lot in global aspects.
Mexicans are going to outnumber whites in USA within 4y and that is a fact. Muslims outnumber whites 8:1 and I am being very conservative on that number.
Look at who they are replacing whites with, uneducated and in need. Come to America and enjoy infrastructure is what they are saying.
Most all other nations without white people is not even built, these people have no idea what it is like to have lights that work all the time, indoor plumbing or even toilets.
They built this nation to extract wealth so that they can rule forever.
same with the christians who want to kill jews for rejecting their god, who had come as a part of a man (you know what i mean lets not do the whole trinity thing here)
and the muslims who want to kill both for the same reason.
all three are the true concept of the abrahamic god, according to their beleifs.
and according to their beliefs, their god has instructed them that anyone who worsbips a false concept of god (an idol) must be put to death by them.
therefore the other two must die, and only one can prevail.
who is correct? whoever is left when the other two die out.
its the same case for morality of any other nature, the one who is right is the one who is left.
the best man always wins because winning ia what makes them the best man.
And yet jews thrived on an entirely Christian continent for almost 2000 years when they could have easily been wiped out. Were jews as tolerant of Chistians and Muslims. The truth is that for most of their history jews have been given extra rights and priveleges in host nations compared to the average native citizens. Thats been true of both Christian and Muslim regimes.
Im fine with discussing this as a religion problem or an ideology problem rather than a strictly jewish one. Frankly we could use more of that sort of debate. But I do think some groups have more aggressive strategies. Maybe all these dogmas seem equally arbitrary and false, but some seem to breed aggression, literally
what you did and what your holy book commanded you to do are two different matters.
you and the muslims were commanded by god to wipe out the jews, you should have wiped out the jews, but you didnt.
your leaders kept them around because they were good for nobility, who had become wealthy and powerful due in a significant part to the jews.
the commoners were the ones to suffer and die as a result of this partnership, they only got poorer and forced to work harder for less reward, to struggle just to survive.
its no wonder then that nobles who performed coup used the discontentment of the masses to seize power by promising the deaths of the jews, and the shabbos goyim amongst the nobility who were consorting with them.
a societys prosperity is best predicted by how well the members of the poorest class are doing, so the places where these revolutions succeeded soon experienced a golden age of productivity and culture, not because they stole wealth or industry away from the jews, but because they took full control over their own labor as a soveriegn nation.
In all fairness to kikes, there is a diversity of opinion about whether to kill all the Christians or even if Christians are idolators. You can tell that the interviewer is a jew and he points out that the justification the last guy uses is from the gemara (i.e. Talmud) which is not the literal word of god but the product of men who are sages not prophets, according to their beliefs. But theres justification for killing non-jews in the bible too.
But generally I think most orthodox think that Christians are idolators for praying to the crucifix. Theres no point in Christians trying to be Noahides because they don’t qualify. Whether most of the orthodox privately advocate the killing of Christians for this is less clear to me.
I think most secular and reform jews dont believe this and are in denial of how evil orthodox judaism (i.e. real judaism) really is. They always play interference for the orthodox community but I honestly think secular jews have no idea what orthodoxy even teaches.
I think he calls Jesus a ben zonah which is son of a whore.
I think most orthodox think that Christians are idolators for praying to the crucifix
They pray in front of one, towards one, to one. Im not saying Christians worship a stick of wood. Im saying that however jews perceive this behavior, it fits their definition of idolatry. On face value it does seem to fit the definition of idolatry in the OT. No images. No molten forms. Its all over the OT.
Hey, idol, no idol, its all the same to me. But I don’t think its crazy for jews to point out that praying before and image of Jesus might violate OT law. I think its crazy to care about OT taboos, but thats just judaism in a nutshell. Theyre being consistent with their religion which is the literal interpretation of the OT.
Its a shitty book. Christians will always have a problem with it because the OT runs counter to Christian values and practices.
Banning idolatry was just a means for the Levites of gaining a monopoly over the Israelite religion. People had to go to the temple to pray instead of praying to statues in their backyard. That means more shekels for the Levites.
Was worshipping baalim in ancient Palestine psychologically different from praying to a crucifix or a statue of a saint? I pretty much doubt it but I don’t have a Phd. in comparative religions.
You know, hindus pray to these stone carved phallic symbols called linga? They are meant to represent Shiva’s penis which is the root of the world or something. If you ask a Hindu, “ hey, do you worship penises?” they will say no, and they will give you a long explanation about how you are thinking about the behavior all wrong. But am I crazy for noticing that Hindus appear to be worshipping penises?
[ + ] didyouknow
[ - ] didyouknow 12 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 09:26:33 ago (+12/-0)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 4 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 09:50:18 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Reawakened
[ - ] Reawakened 9 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 08:16:40 ago (+9/-0)
[ + ] fnbs
[ - ] fnbs 3 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 11:12:15 ago (+3/-0)*
[ + ] DukeofRaul
[ - ] DukeofRaul 1 point 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 15:55:43 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 16:00:30 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh 5 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 10:11:51 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 4 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 11:45:18 ago (+4/-0)
"But not ALL mafia members are bad"
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 4 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 09:48:17 ago (+4/-0)
It doesn't really matter which sect, because it all has the same source, their sick and twisted books like the talmud, the book of tanya and the lurian kaballa.
MARTIN LUTHER WAS RIGHT. THey're pigs.
[ + ] Thyhorrorcosmic103
[ - ] Thyhorrorcosmic103 3 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 07:58:53 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 09:41:45 ago (+5/-2)*
Based on these verses, devout male jews bind these leather boxes to their head and arms while the “daven” (pray spastically) They contain verses of Torah on scraps of paper.
Who knows what the fuck the bible is talking about. But they think its these little boxes with verses inside.
Teffilin on Amazon $850! (Half their rackets are on their own people!)
https://www.amazon.com/Kosher-Tefillin-Gassot-Mehudar-Handed/dp/B008NVTEUK/
Play version haha.
https://www.amazon.com/MUNDO-JUDAICO-First-Play-Tefillin/dp/B0CVJWNLVX/
[ + ] dass
[ - ] dass 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 17:40:08 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 [op] 1 point 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 08:03:56 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 6 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 08:30:28 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] firestation7
[ - ] firestation7 3 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 09:54:49 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 11:29:51 ago (+1/-1)*
b) Suggestion tempts one to ignore perception, hence ignorance representing the black shroud over the cube of perception.
c) Consenting (want OR not want) to a suggestion establishes a conflict of reason (want VERSUS not want) aka circular logic within ones mind/memory aka around ones shrouded cube of ignored perception.
d) Consenting to a suggestion implies religion/religio - "to bind anew", hence ones choice binding itself to a chosen ones suggestion.
e) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squaring_the_circle ...that's the foundation of your dancing muslims. And this... https://media1.jpc.de/image/w600/front/0/5099748724526.jpg')" class="expand" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squaring_the_circle">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squaring_the_circle ...that's the foundation of your dancing muslims. And this... https://media1.jpc.de/image/w600/front/0/5099748724526.jpg">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squaring_the_circle">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squaring_the_circle ...that's the foundation of your dancing muslims. And this... https://media1.jpc.de/image/w600/front/0/5099748724526.jpg
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 15:57:11 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 16:18:27 ago (+0/-0)
Anyway...how would you describe the origin of cube and circle?
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 17:03:18 ago (+0/-0)
You mean generally? An artifact of human cognition. I mean one can arise naturally of course but usually we go around making them because they have a cognitive significance
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 9 monthsSep 22, 2024 03:32:18 ago (+0/-0)
How is meaning generated?
So an artifice shaped by human cognition of natural...what is holding artificial shapes together?
a) Does meaning arise naturally or could meaning be artificial?
b) What if one can only arise (life) during loss (inception towards death)?
How does one shape a cube while going AROUND like a circle?
Does nature make "marks of identification" aka signs? Do few control many with artificial marks of identification? Without significance shaped artificially, what would real nature be perceived as?
What is the first natural significance/sign a human recognizes?
[ + ] Steelerfish
[ - ] Steelerfish 1 point 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 09:14:56 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 1 point 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 18:09:53 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 2 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 11:42:47 ago (+2/-0)
Really needs to be in the top ten short films to red pill people.
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 1 point 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 18:15:33 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 1 point 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 18:14:19 ago (+1/-0)
theyre gonna wipe out the greatest warrior race on earth?
[ + ] 9000timesempty
[ - ] 9000timesempty 1 point 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 14:58:53 ago (+1/-0)
They are goblins.
Not anything resembling God's people.
They must be destroyed. Set on fire. Their ashes used for road building materials.
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 1 point 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 14:46:02 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper 1 point 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 14:31:23 ago (+1/-0)
They can both go into the ovens together.
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 1 point 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 13:55:57 ago (+1/-0)
The words they utter are the same as muzzies except muzzies recognise and respect Jesus
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 15:59:23 ago (+0/-0)
Okay.
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 18:04:13 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] firestation7
[ - ] firestation7 1 point 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 09:53:57 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Hermes
[ - ] Hermes 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 21:47:15 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Indoctrinated_USA
[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 15:51:36 ago (+0/-0)
The christian bit is a secondary expression.
You saw this in Russia after the coup.
You see it in the stated aims of the Frankfurt school.
2/3 of the world's christians are third world shitskins.
That's called 'low hanging fruit'.
[ + ] Anotherone
[ - ] Anotherone 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 14:50:28 ago (+0/-0)
It's working too. People in general are not able to see past the immediate, and if you haven't been looking around, whites are the minority by a lot in global aspects.
Mexicans are going to outnumber whites in USA within 4y and that is a fact. Muslims outnumber whites 8:1 and I am being very conservative on that number.
Look at who they are replacing whites with, uneducated and in need. Come to America and enjoy infrastructure is what they are saying.
Most all other nations without white people is not even built, these people have no idea what it is like to have lights that work all the time, indoor plumbing or even toilets.
They built this nation to extract wealth so that they can rule forever.
[ + ] KurtCobainsBrain
[ - ] KurtCobainsBrain 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 13:28:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Leveraction
[ - ] Leveraction 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 12:29:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 10:48:24 ago (+1/-1)
same with the christians who want to kill jews for rejecting their god, who had come as a part of a man (you know what i mean lets not do the whole trinity thing here)
and the muslims who want to kill both for the same reason.
all three are the true concept of the abrahamic god, according to their beleifs.
and according to their beliefs, their god has instructed them that anyone who worsbips a false concept of god (an idol) must be put to death by them.
therefore the other two must die, and only one can prevail.
who is correct? whoever is left when the other two die out.
its the same case for morality of any other nature, the one who is right is the one who is left.
the best man always wins because winning ia what makes them the best man.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 11:25:04 ago (+1/-1)
Im fine with discussing this as a religion problem or an ideology problem rather than a strictly jewish one. Frankly we could use more of that sort of debate. But I do think some groups have more aggressive strategies. Maybe all these dogmas seem equally arbitrary and false, but some seem to breed aggression, literally
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist 0 points 9 monthsSep 22, 2024 11:37:00 ago (+0/-0)
you and the muslims were commanded by god to wipe out the jews, you should have wiped out the jews, but you didnt.
your leaders kept them around because they were good for nobility, who had become wealthy and powerful due in a significant part to the jews.
the commoners were the ones to suffer and die as a result of this partnership, they only got poorer and forced to work harder for less reward, to struggle just to survive.
its no wonder then that nobles who performed coup used the discontentment of the masses to seize power by promising the deaths of the jews, and the shabbos goyim amongst the nobility who were consorting with them.
a societys prosperity is best predicted by how well the members of the poorest class are doing, so the places where these revolutions succeeded soon experienced a golden age of productivity and culture, not because they stole wealth or industry away from the jews, but because they took full control over their own labor as a soveriegn nation.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 10:07:58 ago (+1/-1)
But generally I think most orthodox think that Christians are idolators for praying to the crucifix. Theres no point in Christians trying to be Noahides because they don’t qualify. Whether most of the orthodox privately advocate the killing of Christians for this is less clear to me.
I think most secular and reform jews dont believe this and are in denial of how evil orthodox judaism (i.e. real judaism) really is. They always play interference for the orthodox community but I honestly think secular jews have no idea what orthodoxy even teaches.
I think he calls Jesus a ben zonah which is son of a whore.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 12:19:58 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 14:18:51 ago (+1/-1)
They pray in front of one, towards one, to one. Im not saying Christians worship a stick of wood. Im saying that however jews perceive this behavior, it fits their definition of idolatry. On face value it does seem to fit the definition of idolatry in the OT. No images. No molten forms. Its all over the OT.
Hey, idol, no idol, its all the same to me. But I don’t think its crazy for jews to point out that praying before and image of Jesus might violate OT law. I think its crazy to care about OT taboos, but thats just judaism in a nutshell. Theyre being consistent with their religion which is the literal interpretation of the OT.
Its a shitty book. Christians will always have a problem with it because the OT runs counter to Christian values and practices.
Banning idolatry was just a means for the Levites of gaining a monopoly over the Israelite religion. People had to go to the temple to pray instead of praying to statues in their backyard. That means more shekels for the Levites.
Was worshipping baalim in ancient Palestine psychologically different from praying to a crucifix or a statue of a saint? I pretty much doubt it but I don’t have a Phd. in comparative religions.
You know, hindus pray to these stone carved phallic symbols called linga? They are meant to represent Shiva’s penis which is the root of the world or something. If you ask a Hindu, “ hey, do you worship penises?” they will say no, and they will give you a long explanation about how you are thinking about the behavior all wrong. But am I crazy for noticing that Hindus appear to be worshipping penises?
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 14:33:59 ago (+0/-0)
No Christians do this. Engaging in idol worship is one behavior to notice if wondering if a Christian-claimer actually is. If they do, they're not.
Still sounds like they're idolizing a physical object. A temple instead of a statue in this case.
As for the Hindus, I hadn't investigated but thought they worshiped cow shit? Or the cows themselves?
[ + ] registereduser
[ - ] registereduser -2 points 9 monthsSep 21, 2024 12:59:24 ago (+0/-2)
Same, same.