This Eighteenth Century christcuck, Carl Linnaeus in 1737 invented the biased taxonomy that divides similar animal groups (genuses) into (species) but the human genus (homo) into just one species with different 'varieties' in order to be consistent with the jew authored bible that says, "we are all one in christ." His system resulted in "all men are created equal" and the 21st Century flooding of European Civilization with simian African savages.
Show/skawia/skau - "to behold" implies a being within reality (perceivable) holding onto fiction (suggested).
animals have different...
Animal/anima/ane - "to breathe" implies being (life) animated (inception towards death), hence reacting to animation by breathing.
Human aka hue (color) of man implies a visible spectrum of light; generated within animation.
all men are created equal
a) "All men" implies an aggregation of each one into an "all". Only within all (whole) can ones (partials) be aggregated together. Few aggregate many in the name of all, while establishing distinctions like all men vs all animals...
b) All implies equal (motion); each one within implies different (matter), yet ones can be shaped "alike" one another.
c) Suggested creationism tempts a consenting creationist to believe in something out of nothing. Ones perception comes into being by "transformation" within the flow of all perceivable.
In other words...whole (motion) generates partials (matter) by setting itself apart inherently, or everything generating each thing through internal separation.
d) Nature differentiates; few within nature equalize differences among many by tempting them together.
Well I don't know about this guy but if you read any of the books from the 18th century and the 19th century you realize very quickly they thought of Africans as not people at all but a very definite subspecies.
And I'm talking about the prevalent scientific literature of the day. You can find a lot of that stuff on gutenberg.org it's all been digitized so just start looking for stuff written in those time. There was no illusion that Africans were the same as white people. Not at all.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 7 monthsSep 29, 2024 02:41:25 ago (+0/-0)
Show/skawia/skau - "to behold" implies a being within reality (perceivable) holding onto fiction (suggested).
Animal/anima/ane - "to breathe" implies being (life) animated (inception towards death), hence reacting to animation by breathing.
Human aka hue (color) of man implies a visible spectrum of light; generated within animation.
a) "All men" implies an aggregation of each one into an "all". Only within all (whole) can ones (partials) be aggregated together. Few aggregate many in the name of all, while establishing distinctions like all men vs all animals...
b) All implies equal (motion); each one within implies different (matter), yet ones can be shaped "alike" one another.
c) Suggested creationism tempts a consenting creationist to believe in something out of nothing. Ones perception comes into being by "transformation" within the flow of all perceivable.
In other words...whole (motion) generates partials (matter) by setting itself apart inherently, or everything generating each thing through internal separation.
d) Nature differentiates; few within nature equalize differences among many by tempting them together.
[ + ] Hoobeejoo
[ - ] Hoobeejoo 0 points 7 monthsSep 29, 2024 09:13:14 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 3 points 7 monthsSep 29, 2024 05:38:00 ago (+3/-0)
And I'm talking about the prevalent scientific literature of the day. You can find a lot of that stuff on gutenberg.org it's all been digitized so just start looking for stuff written in those time. There was no illusion that Africans were the same as white people. Not at all.