Sign into an existing account

Hit the beach or empty space .Looks to me like they are playing the West as usual.

But my TV said the iron dome worked.

Sand Dunes: "oh ouch!"

Trump's going to give them so much money.

So they've been stealing the money for that too, lol

Just a small technical aside, and a question.

Solid fuel rocket motors generally burn themselves out in about the first 10 seconds of the flight, during the "boost phase".

So after they hit apogee (or max ordinate) the motor has already burned itself out, and they are just an empty pipe with a warhead, coasting on inertia, going nose down and accelerating towards the ground under gravity.

Watch some of the historical combat footage of missiles and rockets from other conflicts.
Pay specific attention to the rocket motor burn.

And I can tell you with some authority, having been on the receiving end of 107mm Type 63's and 122mm BM-21's (on a multiple daily/nightly basis for weeks at a time sometimes) that's NOT what an incoming rocket looks like.

What you almost never see is the rocket motor burning all the way into the target, unless the range from the launcher is ridiculously short. Point-blank range.

Look at the angles of descent. Then remember that these are entirely ballistic, unguided rockets. The "reciprocal angle" rule would mean that the angle of launchers would also be correspondingly steep. Such rockets are prepped for launch using a compass, a map, and an inclinometer (If the gunner is even minimally competent. Most often they're just pointed generally, "thataway".)

So...

Question: Why are we still seeing fire from burning rocket motors on descending "rockets", supposedly launched from kilometers away?

None of what we see in the video makes any realistic sense unless you start from the premise that it's fake.
Then suddenly every element makes perfect sense.

Unless of course you are willing to believe someone who is known to lie with every breath, in thought, word, and deed, for over 80 years about a "muh 6 gorillion" grift in order to tarnish an entire people, gain sympathy for themselves and grift the normies, are suddenly going to start showing you the unvarnished truth.

It's the sort of thing that a "media person", who doesn't know shit about how actual weapons work, would put into a video for dramatic visual effect. Without that, all you would see is just explosions on the ground. I suspect a director in there somewhere, leaning over a graphics guy's shoulder, saying, "Oy vey! Okay, the explosions are good, but it just doesn't say, 'missile', to me. Could you make it more, you know, 'missile-y'?"

You know what this IS useful for? Supporting clownworld's desire to drag us into a war with iran as soon as possible..

Allahu Akbar!

The real question is how accurate are Iranian missiles? They don’t use GPS. It’s been suggested that they’re using some kind of image recognition based on satellite photography for the missiles to adjust their trajectory onto the target.