"One is less gay bro. If you had to choose, you would pick top. Because it's less gay bro. Come on bro."
One time he got us beers and before he gave me my beer he asked me for a hug, Wtf?
When he was at my place and we were on the computer he pointed out the 4chan banner ad for the "cute male" board here and said "do you ever go on there?...oh yeah me neither. I only went there for 5 minutes and it's just a bunch of guys kissing and shit."
Just today, he joked about how it wouldn't be as gay to get your dick sucked as it would be to suck dick,
I bring up the Bible and tell him that any man who lies with a man should be put to death. He replies "how is that defined bro? because dick sucking is not like you're having sex bro!".
What is wrong with this guy? I tell him that the original DSM listed homosexuality as sociopathic personality disturbance and he acknowledges that homosexuality is a mental illness, so why does he continue with this constant covert faggotry? He says he wants to marry and have kids with an unvaccinated girl. What's the move? Has this happened to anybody else? What would you tell him?
I bring up the Bible and tell him that any man who lies with a man should be put to death. He replies "how is that defined bro? because dick sucking is not like you're having sex bro!".
Aka distinguishing between friend or foe within a conflict of reason, just like top vs bottom or straight vs bent.
HAS to...
If one operates within any conflict of reason, then one consented to a suggestion beforehand, hence being contractually bound aka HAS TO.
In your example...friend stems from the root pri (to love), which implies suggested moralism (love vs hate). As long as you consent to moralism, so long will you establish conflicts of reason by branding others friend or foe.
Such a conflict within self is called "logic", and aimed against others it's called "reason".
what is wrong with this guy?
Same trick here...your consent to suggested determinism establishes a conflict of reason (right vs wrong), which your consent perpetuates forwards.
homesexuality
HOMO (same; equal; like) contradicts SEX (seco; to divide; different)...
ok i remember you from old voat. i was pissed at you for not dumbing down your shit to 120 IQ level. if you can please do that. pretend you're talking to a fucking dumb latina or a fucking chud. i'm not a philosopher and i'm drunk. come down from your ivory tower. i admit you are smarter. now act like it and get your message across efficiently. this isn't lord of the rings faggot.
yea I'm super new, I'm like so new. Don't believe everything you read on the internet. We've had long conversations with and about that guy being a bot. It's on some Gnosticism kick
right up until christmas, he's been here and on scored for a while as well. If he isn't a bot, then he refuses to say so in a coherent straightforward manner. If you say the right things, he pops up, picks it apart, never makes a point.
Why would anyone accused of being a bot try to defend being alive? What if it's an accuser who carries the curse until another accepts it?
straightforward manner.
Straightforward (inception towards death) manner (life)...that implies status quo of being. Refusing that implies denying to be alive. I'm busy manually resisting the temptation of being forwarded straight.
If you say the right things, he pops up, picks it apart, never makes a point.
a) Life sentenced from inception towards point of death implies apart from one another.
b) Right vs wrong (reason) contradicts if/then (implication)... why am I called a bot for describing how that works by those who ignore to be human?
c) Picking implies collecting aka holding onto, so does making a point. I adapt to what inspires me now, and then I let go of it, instead of collecting information.
Wanting (thesis) vs not wanting (anti-thesis) coherence (synthesis)... you are being tricked to play yourself like a fool. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic
Go ahead.
Life being moved from inception towards death implies needing to resist the wanted temptation to "go ahead". A jew suggests progressivism to tempt gentiles forwards... https://forward.com/
Do this one
One implies being done by all, while re-doing self.
a) Admission vs denial aka smarter vs dumber...always a conflict, no matter which side you choose. This is called dialectic aka thesis (admission) anti-thesis (denial) synthesis (conflict of reason).
In your example...thesis (top) anti-thesis (bottom) synthesis (top vs bottom reasoning among friends). So why are you guys conflicting about sodomy? Because it was suggested to you by a third party aka through entertainment; religion; politics; science; advertisement etc. and both of you consented from different sides to the same conflict. As long as you fight each other, so long can the third party fuck you both.
b) https://www.etymonline.com/word/synthesize That's what few do to many...tempting them together, which equalizes differences among many. Nature makes different; few within nature destroy differences by synthesizing them. That's why many follow orders by few and it's self destructive.
You and your friend are thinking that you have an isolated little conflict about who fucks whom in the ass, but a jew set up each one of these isolated conflicts among gentiles as logic/reason aka synthesis...and gentiles fighting each other cannot see this, even if you show it to them. They immediately use logic/reason/synthesis with what is being said, hence establishing yet another conflict of reason...truth vs false or belief vs disbelief or agree vs disagree or want vs not want or smart vs dumb aka thesis vs anti-thesis.
HOMO (same; equal; like) contradicts SEX (seco; to divide; different)...
How could I write about this contradiction between SAME (homo) and DIFFERENT (sex) without others ignoring it? Whenever a gentile says "homosexual", a jew can see the contradiction aka can see that a gentile just said "same-difference". Anyone operating like this lives within an artificial world, within a confined mental imagination where same equals different. Such a gentile willingly refuses to participate in reality, instead such a gentile runs around impotently within reality while telling others that he likes or dislikes same (homo) differences (sexuals).
Conversion/conversare - "turning together"...choosing either yay or nay turns both together and against each other. Let's use your example...what happens if bottom and top turn? You'll have bottom up top and top on bottom...still sodomizing each other.
What's the origin of turning? Nature turning velocity (inception towards death) into resistance (life)...a jew suggests gentiles to convert; which turns them against each other within conflicts of reason.
Wanna turn your boyfriend from being gay? Try a girlfriend...
The act of converting something or someone. Ex: His conversion to Christianity To transform or change (something) into another form, substance, state, or product.
Not "turning together". You pick the wrong definition and then expand on it lol. You are feeding your logic process with bullshit and then spewing out more trash.
That implies nature acting as flow (inception towards death) and each one within reacting as form (life), hence "turning" action into reactions aka whole into partials aka velocity into resistance aka all into each one.
Those within nature cannot act...only react.
His conversion to Christianity
That implies him consenting to suggested Christianity by another, hence turning together from perceivable towards suggested aka being "conned".
Adapting to perceivable implies apart from one another, while con-senting to suggested implies a coming together.
To transform or change (something) into another form, substance, state, or product.
Flow (inception towards death) generates form (life) by setting each apart from one another.
you picked the wrong definition
Definite implies "to affix"...being alive implies during motion (inception towards death). I don't pick definitions...I describe the contradiction in holding onto any definition.
You are feeding your logic process
Logic (a conflict of reason) contradicts being (life) processed (inception towards death). Why? Because logic/reason tempts one to hold onto a side, while ignoring to be within motion. It's logic which turns each side held onto against the other, hence always turning together that which nature sets apart.
There's a small chance he's fuckin with you because he knows it makes your skin crawl, and a very large chance he wants to give you a bro job. Either way, it's feminine behavior and you should chain his ankles to the rear bumper of your truck and take him for a ride down a gravel road.
If you’ll flip, you’ll flop. He’s trying to figure out if you’re pitching or catching! He wants you to handle his power bottom faggot ass! You’re either gonna have to kill him or oblige him. Sorry bro.😂
[ - ] alacrity167 [op] 1 point 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:37:45 ago (+1/-0)*
how is he broken? what does that mean? i can admit from an intellectual standpoint that he's messed up, but I descend from Puritans and am very offput by these absolute degenerates. what the hell is their problem. why do they like sticking their dick in shitholes and playing with shit etc.?
I think, that he thinks, that you’re gay. He’s trying to come out to you in every way possible in hopes something will happen for him. Idk. Just a thought. What else could it be?
Could be the “rejection” is a turn on, or presents a challenge? I’m no psychologist, although I claim to hold a BS., MS., and a Phd in street psychology. (Bullshit, more shit, piled high and deep) Maybe he’s just fucking with you in some way that he still thinks it’s funny, even though it’s highly irritating to you, and that’s his ‘get off’. People are fucked up man.
I heard the term from an old friend who is a guard at Folsom Prison. Regarding inmate faggot sex, it means if you’ll get sucked, you’ll suck it, and so on.
[ + ] Sal_180
[ - ] Sal_180 -1 points 6 monthsOct 5, 2024 16:15:15 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 08:00:43 ago (+0/-0)
He's fucking with you because you're autistic
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 15:37:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 1 point 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:42:38 ago (+1/-0)
Aka distinguishing between friend or foe within a conflict of reason, just like top vs bottom or straight vs bent.
If one operates within any conflict of reason, then one consented to a suggestion beforehand, hence being contractually bound aka HAS TO.
In your example...friend stems from the root pri (to love), which implies suggested moralism (love vs hate). As long as you consent to moralism, so long will you establish conflicts of reason by branding others friend or foe.
Such a conflict within self is called "logic", and aimed against others it's called "reason".
Same trick here...your consent to suggested determinism establishes a conflict of reason (right vs wrong), which your consent perpetuates forwards.
HOMO (same; equal; like) contradicts SEX (seco; to divide; different)...
[ + ] alacrity167
[ - ] alacrity167 [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:44:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:47:06 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] alacrity167
[ - ] alacrity167 [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:50:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:58:30 ago (+0/-0)
Don't believe everything you read on the internet.
We've had long conversations with and about that guy being a bot.
It's on some Gnosticism kick
[ + ] alacrity167
[ - ] alacrity167 [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 02:01:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 1 point 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 02:08:02 ago (+1/-0)
If he isn't a bot, then he refuses to say so in a coherent straightforward manner.
If you say the right things, he pops up, picks it apart, never makes a point.
Go ahead. Do this one. implication
[ + ] alacrity167
[ - ] alacrity167 [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 02:12:53 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 1 point 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 04:34:47 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 04:25:29 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 04:24:53 ago (+0/-1)
Why would anyone accused of being a bot try to defend being alive? What if it's an accuser who carries the curse until another accepts it?
Straightforward (inception towards death) manner (life)...that implies status quo of being. Refusing that implies denying to be alive. I'm busy manually resisting the temptation of being forwarded straight.
a) Life sentenced from inception towards point of death implies apart from one another.
b) Right vs wrong (reason) contradicts if/then (implication)... why am I called a bot for describing how that works by those who ignore to be human?
c) Picking implies collecting aka holding onto, so does making a point. I adapt to what inspires me now, and then I let go of it, instead of collecting information.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/coherent aka "sticking together"...being implies set apart from one another, hence set loose with FREE will of choice.
Wanting (thesis) vs not wanting (anti-thesis) coherence (synthesis)... you are being tricked to play yourself like a fool. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic
Life being moved from inception towards death implies needing to resist the wanted temptation to "go ahead". A jew suggests progressivism to tempt gentiles forwards... https://forward.com/
One implies being done by all, while re-doing self.
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 2 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 04:33:34 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] alacrity167
[ - ] alacrity167 [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 07:02:06 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 03:56:26 ago (+0/-1)*
a) Admission vs denial aka smarter vs dumber...always a conflict, no matter which side you choose. This is called dialectic aka thesis (admission) anti-thesis (denial) synthesis (conflict of reason).
In your example...thesis (top) anti-thesis (bottom) synthesis (top vs bottom reasoning among friends). So why are you guys conflicting about sodomy? Because it was suggested to you by a third party aka through entertainment; religion; politics; science; advertisement etc. and both of you consented from different sides to the same conflict. As long as you fight each other, so long can the third party fuck you both.
b) https://www.etymonline.com/word/synthesize That's what few do to many...tempting them together, which equalizes differences among many. Nature makes different; few within nature destroy differences by synthesizing them. That's why many follow orders by few and it's self destructive.
You and your friend are thinking that you have an isolated little conflict about who fucks whom in the ass, but a jew set up each one of these isolated conflicts among gentiles as logic/reason aka synthesis...and gentiles fighting each other cannot see this, even if you show it to them. They immediately use logic/reason/synthesis with what is being said, hence establishing yet another conflict of reason...truth vs false or belief vs disbelief or agree vs disagree or want vs not want or smart vs dumb aka thesis vs anti-thesis.
How could I write about this contradiction between SAME (homo) and DIFFERENT (sex) without others ignoring it? Whenever a gentile says "homosexual", a jew can see the contradiction aka can see that a gentile just said "same-difference". Anyone operating like this lives within an artificial world, within a confined mental imagination where same equals different. Such a gentile willingly refuses to participate in reality, instead such a gentile runs around impotently within reality while telling others that he likes or dislikes same (homo) differences (sexuals).
[ + ] alacrity167
[ - ] alacrity167 [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 07:09:50 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 08:54:55 ago (+0/-1)
What's the origin of turning? Nature turning velocity (inception towards death) into resistance (life)...a jew suggests gentiles to convert; which turns them against each other within conflicts of reason.
Wanna turn your boyfriend from being gay? Try a girlfriend...
[ + ] alacrity167
[ - ] alacrity167 [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 10:53:42 ago (+0/-0)
Ex: His conversion to Christianity
To transform or change (something) into another form, substance, state, or product.
Not "turning together". You pick the wrong definition and then expand on it lol. You are feeding your logic process with bullshit and then spewing out more trash.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 11:40:43 ago (+0/-0)
That implies nature acting as flow (inception towards death) and each one within reacting as form (life), hence "turning" action into reactions aka whole into partials aka velocity into resistance aka all into each one.
Those within nature cannot act...only react.
That implies him consenting to suggested Christianity by another, hence turning together from perceivable towards suggested aka being "conned".
https://www.etymonline.com/word/con + https://www.etymonline.com/word/com-
Adapting to perceivable implies apart from one another, while con-senting to suggested implies a coming together.
Flow (inception towards death) generates form (life) by setting each apart from one another.
Definite implies "to affix"...being alive implies during motion (inception towards death). I don't pick definitions...I describe the contradiction in holding onto any definition.
Logic (a conflict of reason) contradicts being (life) processed (inception towards death). Why? Because logic/reason tempts one to hold onto a side, while ignoring to be within motion. It's logic which turns each side held onto against the other, hence always turning together that which nature sets apart.
As for Latin/latere - "to lie hidden"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Latin
[ + ] DitchPig
[ - ] DitchPig 1 point 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 15:40:36 ago (+1/-0)
Sounds like all these young cunts who think describing homosexual acts is somehow "funny".
They were raised by paedophiles, which is why they act this way.
Smack this proto faggot upside the head, and set him straight.
[ + ] Reawakened
[ - ] Reawakened 2 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 06:21:46 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] registereduser
[ - ] registereduser 2 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 08:06:45 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] carnold03
[ - ] carnold03 3 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 05:52:41 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 4 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:46:44 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey
[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 8 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:24:52 ago (+8/-0)
He’s trying to figure out if you’re pitching or catching!
He wants you to handle his power bottom faggot ass!
You’re either gonna have to kill him or oblige him.
Sorry bro.😂
[ + ] alacrity167
[ - ] alacrity167 [op] 3 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:26:03 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 6 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:31:46 ago (+6/-0)
It's not "just a preference"
He's broken. Sorry you had to find out this way. There are worse ways to find out.
[ + ] alacrity167
[ - ] alacrity167 [op] 1 point 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:37:45 ago (+1/-0)*
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 5 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:40:03 ago (+5/-0)
He's clearly a degenerate faggot (and it sounds like he wants to fuck you)
[ + ] alacrity167
[ - ] alacrity167 [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:41:14 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 2 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:46:07 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 1 point 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 07:01:07 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] alacrity167
[ - ] alacrity167 [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 07:12:11 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] DitchPig
[ - ] DitchPig 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 15:41:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey
[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 3 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:43:40 ago (+3/-0)
He’s trying to come out to you in every way possible in hopes something will happen for him.
Idk. Just a thought.
What else could it be?
[ + ] alacrity167
[ - ] alacrity167 [op] 1 point 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:49:10 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey
[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 3 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 02:06:05 ago (+3/-0)
I’m no psychologist, although I claim to hold a BS., MS., and a Phd in street psychology.
(Bullshit, more shit, piled high and deep)
Maybe he’s just fucking with you in some way that he still thinks it’s funny, even though it’s highly irritating to you, and that’s his ‘get off’.
People are fucked up man.
[ + ] alacrity167
[ - ] alacrity167 [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:45:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey
[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 2 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 02:08:09 ago (+2/-0)
Regarding inmate faggot sex, it means if you’ll get sucked, you’ll suck it, and so on.
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 13 points 7 monthsOct 4, 2024 01:14:04 ago (+13/-0)