×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
0
1 comments block


[ - ] Crackinjokes 1 point 6 monthsOct 16, 2024 04:32:16 ago (+1/-0)

"The mission will not look directly for signs of life but will instead look to answer the question: Does Europa contain the ingredients that would allow it to thrive?

If it does, another mission would then have to make the journey to try and detect it."


This is always been the plan for perpetual funding after NASA made the critical mistake of allowing a probe that could actually detect life the Viking probes in 1976 which actually detected life multiple times on mars. They realize very quickly that if they've detected life on these planets it changes the game so much and they may not be able to get funding to get there different probes and things so now it has to be an eternal quest to find if there is life and of course to do that they can't actually take a microscope which would actually see immediately if they're a little microbes running around in the soil of the water but instead they have to take a lot of ancillary instruments that look at sideways things that only determine whether or not there might be the potential for life to exist they don't just take a fucking microscope which would tell them in two fucking seconds whether or not there's a fucking moving amoeba in the soil or in the ocean. Because then they're funding would be over.

And that is what the Viking 1976 missions to Mars taught them and why they cover up the results of what that found which clearly was life despite all their ridiculous stupid fake and disprovable chemical explanations for what was widely accepted as an indication for life when it happened. And has stood up the test of time for multiple different researchers who've looked at the data over and over since then and tried every alternative explanation and found no other alternative explanation works.