Sign into an existing account

Even Ann Coulter, probably the foremost current opponent of the 19th Amendment, has said women can hold office. They just can't vote.

What is actually the case is no one should vote. Nor should government exist. A woman's proper role is to screw everything that moves. It is also what she wants to do. True liberation is acting in conformity with our authentic nature. Simple as.

https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=65b550170ebc0

https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=65e2b91fd64e4

There are too many authoritarians in this movement that think the right path is a no fun military-like regimentation, or worse, nuclear war tier violence. It isn't marketable on a mass scale. Newsflash.

take lead of my kitchen maybe

Women are not leaders! Their logic sub-routine is frequently overridden by their emotional stack!

How about Thomas Massie, the good congressman from Arkansas? He openly admits that he's one of few not controlled/owned by AIPAC... I'll be using my vote to write the man in.

Women have their lucid moments, but the other 25days of the month are a crap shoot...Maggie Thatcher, Queen Boudica, Joan of Arch are the feminista symbols of strength and leadership, they're overrated...I will give mild exception to Catherine the Great and Benazir Bhutto as even they had strong decisive men behind them...within their short monthly period of lucidity, in a calm structured environment, women can be surprisingly intelligent, rational and wise, problem is that they can't maintain the momentum given menstrual cycles and the 7days prior/post their cycle...woman is the mother men long for and the garden of eden from which they are exiled, their nature is passive aggressive yet when they agonize in grief over a loss (of whatever) men weaken to instinctive chivalry, to the point where they forfeit all they have, even their life, so as to rescue and comfort a woman in her time of need and the fact that men are deemed disposable and replaceable today still doesn't fully resonate because of the natural instinctive imperative to protect the mother of all men...women today are delusionally vane and callous with self serving interests, they're more interested in materialism than they are maternity.
I'd be hard pressed to help out 98% of women today and 100% committed to keeping them out of political leadership or any station of power and decision making...that stated, drag a woman by the hair, and she'll love you for it.

The girl from mummy 2?

A strongly led woman can most definitely lead the children.

Absolutely they should be relegated to the home and only interact socially with their husband or father present.

It's possible for a woman to be a good leader but it's more rare than for a man to be a good leader because of differences in how our brains work.

A major issue facing our species is that dumb and inferior women have an easier time finding a mate, while high quality women are often too picky and end up either waiting too long and having far fewer kids or none at all. We need societal institutions that help match highly capable women up with good mates while they're in their late teens and early 20s so they can have 3+ kids each.

*women. I swear I will throw a party when this laptop dies, the keyboard layout is deigned like shit.