×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
3

everything you believe is precisely wrong. (((they))) demonstrate their obsession with categorization, have grouped everyone on the internet into ideological boxes with an inventory on everything the people in each box believes in or values, each persons mind shall not wander away from their boxes.

submitted by AntiPostmodernist to whatever 7 monthsOct 28, 2024 06:38:26 ago (+3/-0)     (whatever)

When a nation wields significant power, it often finds itself in a position where it can shape narratives and influence political discourse more effectively than less powerful counterparts. This ability to control or manufacture political issues and conflicts serves several strategic purposes. For one, it allows the dominant nation to distract from internal problems or failures, creating external scapegoats or threats that unify its populace and shift focus away from domestic discontent.

Additionally, powerful nations can use fabricated conflicts to justify certain actions on the international stage, such as military interventions, economic sanctions, or political maneuvers that serve their interests. By creating or exaggerating threats, they can rally international support or, at the very least, reduce resistance to their actions. This control over the narrative also puts their opposition on the defensive, forcing them to respond to accusations or threats rather than advancing their own agendas.

Moreover, in the information age, where media and communication technologies play a critical role, powerful nations can leverage these tools to amplify their narratives globally. This media dominance means that their version of events is often the one that reaches the broadest audience, shaping public perception and international opinion.

In contrast, less powerful nations or groups often lack the resources to create or propagate their own narratives effectively. They are more likely to be reactive, dealing with the issues and conflicts presented to them by more powerful actors. This dynamic can perpetuate the imbalance of power, as the dominant nation continues to set the agenda, while their opposition struggles to keep up.

Thus, the power to make up political issues and conflicts is not merely a tool of convenience for powerful nations; it is a fundamental aspect of maintaining and enhancing their influence both domestically and internationally. This ability underscores the broader geopolitical realities where narrative control is as critical as military or economic might.


2 comments block


[ - ] boekanier 0 points 7 monthsOct 28, 2024 10:29:04 ago (+0/-0)

"everyone is locked up in their own ideological box". Interesting thought. If this was the intention of the elites, it was a real devil's trick. The crucial criterion in that respect is the total power over the media. The rest will follow, just as they have planned.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 28, 2024 20:08:31 ago (+0/-0)

ideological gerrymandering.

break up useful sets of beliefs and mix the severed parts with beliefs that counteract the utility of the pieces of the useful belief set youve merged them with.

then set these hodgrpodge belief sets at odds with one another, such that they get caught up in whose useless belief set is the best.

for example:

"we should have guns so that we can shoot the police if the government turns tyrannical, the government has turned into a tyranny so we should get out guns and shoot the police."

this set of ideas threatens the status quo of any country but do a little ideological gerrymandering and you get:

"i love guns and support the police, i oppose violence against the system."

and

"i oppose the police and think they support a tyranny, i also think that only they should have guns and that everything should be centralized under their control".

both sets of ideas are friggin useless and self defeating. yet these are the two most popular options in america.