×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
3
10 comments block


[ - ] Tallest_Skil 4 points 7 monthsNov 4, 2024 09:09:29 ago (+5/-1)

Because the buildings had been built with plane collisions in mind, is the point. They were brought down by controlled demolition, at any rate.

[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 7 monthsNov 4, 2024 09:29:31 ago (+1/-0)

no, i think he knows he is just playing the fool

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 7 monthsNov 4, 2024 09:18:31 ago (+2/-1)

It's called thermite and it was found in the buildings after 9-11.

[ - ] Theo -1 points 7 monthsNov 4, 2024 10:56:30 ago (+0/-1)

The thermite theory started with Steven Jones. He was involved in the debunking of Pons & Fleishmans's cold fusion. There was another theory that micro nukes were used, which is a better explanation for the very high amount of energy required to turn concrete into dust.

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 7 monthsNov 4, 2024 10:59:54 ago (+2/-1)

There are pictures of steel girders cut at 45° angles. Nukes from above can't do that. Thermite placed on the beams by Demolition Inc. can.

[ - ] Theo -1 points 7 monthsNov 4, 2024 11:07:29 ago (+0/-1)

Yes, I saw those photos. One theory being true doesn't disprove the other though.

[ - ] Fishsticksforever 1 point 7 monthsNov 4, 2024 11:36:01 ago (+2/-1)

Firefighters stated that there were "pools of molten iron weeks after the towers fell"

[ - ] Theo 1 point 7 monthsNov 4, 2024 14:16:39 ago (+1/-0)

They said it was like a foundry there.

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/WTC_Controlled_demolition

[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 7 monthsNov 4, 2024 12:11:38 ago (+0/-1)

So, bofum? Cause if nukes can't do the thing, and there is the thing, then nukes didn't do it.

[ - ] Theo 0 points 7 monthsNov 4, 2024 14:09:50 ago (+0/-0)

So the most reasonable explanation is that both types of explosive were used.