Despite the timing of its upload, this video is in no way, shape, or form a commentary on contemporary events in the United States or elsewhere in the world. Your uploader (me) explicitly disavows upcoming social events beginning with the letter E (or V) and takes no position thereon. No publishable position, at least.
This (algorithmically generated) song is to be understood only within the context of its own contents and how they pertain at any given moment to one’s own life, not to any specific event.
Lyrics:
If the war is over, Twenty years from today, At sunup, Will you be able to say, “I fought for something”?
Twenty years from today, Did you choose a side Or stand aside when it came time to choose And throw the dice to decide Who will win, and who will lose?
And twenty years from today Will you remember why you fought? Or didn't fight? And was it all in vain? Were the things that matter most to you, Were they worth the suffering and pain?
Or did you stay on the sideline For fear of choosing wrong? Or losing it all because The cost of doing what you believe is right Wasn't worth the risk of standing?
Twenty years from today, Will you look on in regret And wish when what you could have stood for Is taken and long gone? And say to yourself each morning, "I was there. I could have chose– Chose to stand.” And wonder 'til your grave What could have been?
And twenty years from today Will you remember why you fought? Or didn't fight? And was it all in vain? Were the things that matter most to you, Were they worth the suffering and pain?
Or did you stay on the sideline For fear of choosing wrong? Or losing it all because The cost of doing what you believe is right Wasn't worth the risk of standing?
Will you look on in regret And wish when what you could have stood for Is taken and long gone? And say to yourself each morning, "I was there. I could have chose– Chose to stand.” And wonder 'til your grave What could have been?
And twenty years from today Will you remember why you fought? Or didn't fight? And was it all in vain? Were the things that matter most to you, Were they worth the suffering and pain?
Or did you stay on the sideline For fear of choosing wrong? Or losing it all because The cost of doing what you believe is right Wasn't worth the risk of standing?
Nice. I agree this applies more to our daily lives than any orchestrated events well beyond our control. There is always a risk to doing what is right. Especially when it is deemed unpopular, unwise, or even illegal.
Shout out to @prototype. I believe he wrote these lyrics.
Regrettably, "The Risk Of Standing" is some of the mildest words I've written. About half of what I've written has remained self-censored because of how 'extreme' it is.
Thanks. I’m very careful about not calling this stuff “AI.” Language is important; it’s the first thing they stole from us. We have a duty to ourselves to be able to think about the world correctly, and to do that we have to use the right words to define the right concepts.
c) Nature cannot be stolen from, since its all (perceivable) offered to ones (perception) free will of choice. Giving consent to suggested (words), while ignoring perceivable (sound) implies taking into possession, which only then permits others the opportunity to steal possessions.
d) A jew doesn't steal language...it crafts a spell and sells it for the price of gentile consent. This tricks gentiles to hold onto fiction (words), while ignoring that reality (sound) cannot be held onto.
to be able to think about the world correctly
Correct vs incorrect implies thinking in circular logic within self and in conflicts of reason against others aka ignorant gentiles fighting each other, while a jew controls both sides by suggesting what the gentiles are "thinking" about.
we have to use the right words to define the right concepts.
a) A jew suggests pluralism (we) to tempt each singular (one) gentile together into a conflict of reason like "right vs wrong".
b) To define (affix) with words tempts one to ignore being moved by sound as a person aka per (by) sonos (sound)...
c) Concept implies "taking together"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/concept Being within nature implies "given apart", hence being set free from one another.
[ + ] Jimmycrackerson
[ - ] Jimmycrackerson 2 points 5 monthsNov 8, 2024 02:19:33 ago (+2/-0)
Shout out to @prototype. I believe he wrote these lyrics.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 0 points 5 monthsNov 8, 2024 07:39:26 ago (+0/-0)
Regrettably, "The Risk Of Standing" is some of the mildest words I've written.
About half of what I've written has remained self-censored because of how 'extreme' it is.
[ + ] beece
[ - ] beece 2 points 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 11:46:45 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Gowithit
[ - ] Gowithit 1 point 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 10:13:03 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 1 point 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 10:02:17 ago (+1/-0)
At least you're not calling it "AI". Until anything happens, this song is just a simulation.
Nobody will ever do anything.
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil [op] 1 point 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 10:21:54 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 12:20:16 ago (+0/-0)*
a) Sound imports (inception) and exports (death) each instrument (life).
b) Port/per - "pass over"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/port A jew celebrates the passing over, while a gentile holds onto definitions.
c) Nature cannot be stolen from, since its all (perceivable) offered to ones (perception) free will of choice. Giving consent to suggested (words), while ignoring perceivable (sound) implies taking into possession, which only then permits others the opportunity to steal possessions.
d) A jew doesn't steal language...it crafts a spell and sells it for the price of gentile consent. This tricks gentiles to hold onto fiction (words), while ignoring that reality (sound) cannot be held onto.
Correct vs incorrect implies thinking in circular logic within self and in conflicts of reason against others aka ignorant gentiles fighting each other, while a jew controls both sides by suggesting what the gentiles are "thinking" about.
a) A jew suggests pluralism (we) to tempt each singular (one) gentile together into a conflict of reason like "right vs wrong".
b) To define (affix) with words tempts one to ignore being moved by sound as a person aka per (by) sonos (sound)...
c) Concept implies "taking together"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/concept Being within nature implies "given apart", hence being set free from one another.