Sign into an existing account

You'd either have to have an insane bias (retarded christcucks) or be a disinfo weasel (usually the same bots who push flat earth push anti-evolution nonsense, they'll pop up in the replies, most likely just a character assassination on darwin because they can't debate the facts of the argument) to not see with your own eyes the obvious progression from rat to little rat-looking monkey thing to monkeys, apes then humans, then the different races humans have taken to adapt to their climates.

"The history of the world in the ages when humans did not yet exist was initially a representation of geological occurrences. The clash of natural forces with each other, the formation of a habitable surface on this planet, the separation of water and land, the formation of the mountains, plains, and the seas. That is the history of the world during this time. Later, with the emergence of organic life, human interest focuses on the appearance and disappearance of its thousandfold forms. Man himself finally becomes visible very late, and from that point on he begins to understand the term ‘world history’ as referring primarily to the history of his own development—in other words, the representation of his own evolution. This development is characterized by the never-ending battle of humans against animals and also against humans themselves. Finally, out of the unclear tangle of individual beings, formations rise—families, tribes, peoples, states. The portrayal of their genesis and dissolution alone is the replication of the eternal struggle for survival."