So, not a 1000%+ increase in total heart attack deaths (he doesn't give those numbers) or per capita heart attack deaths (he also doesn't give those numbers), but a 1000%+ increase in the amount of extra heart attack deaths from one year to the next.
So if in 2019 there were 1000 heart attack deaths, and 2020 there were 1011, and in 2021 there were 1086, and in 2022 there were 1197, etc. that would be a big increase in "excess" deaths but not anywhere near as big an increase in total or per capita deaths. Without knowing the actual total or per capita numbers, we can't see what the actual increase was.
That's not really that surprising, and not anywhere near as shocking as the "1000%" headline number makes it sound.
The numbers in the video claim it went from 11 heart attack deaths in 2020 to 147 heart attack deaths in 2023, a 1,236% increase. If you want the per capita, look up King county pop numbers for those years and do the math. It's not hard.
It is a shocking increase, though by itself doesn't point to much. Seen as part of a whole, where you also account for all the other issues like heart disease, neuro disease, etc etc, it is indicative of something seriously wrong as many of these things are seeing a like-increase in numbers.
And remember, these are the deaths, not the number of heart-attacks, which are surprisingly survivable if you live in a dense area with hospitals and help within reach wherever you are, modern medicine being what it is.
He does point out that there's a research paper, fully peer reviewed and published, that points directly to the vax causing this. While the big scare number he uses is tick-tock-tier dumbassery for the clicks, he does at least give some solid numbers and at least one solid way to start your own research if you are so inclined to actually learn more(rare).
You have to go beyond first-order thinking. You must learn multi-variate thinking if you want to see the whole picture. Focusing on one point, like this guy, is a logical trap. It's an important step in learning of course, but there is more, so much more to learn.
No, the video says EXCESS heart attack deaths went up from 11 to 147. Not TOTAL heart attack deaths. You need to learn the difference between EXCESS deaths and TOTAL deaths before you reply again.
[ + ] bossman131
[ - ] bossman131 1 point 2 monthsMar 21, 2025 20:09:35 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HeavyBrain
[ - ] HeavyBrain 2 points 6 monthsDec 4, 2024 05:03:28 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 2 points 6 monthsDec 4, 2024 04:00:57 ago (+2/-0)*
So, not a 1000%+ increase in total heart attack deaths (he doesn't give those numbers) or per capita heart attack deaths (he also doesn't give those numbers), but a 1000%+ increase in the amount of extra heart attack deaths from one year to the next.
So if in 2019 there were 1000 heart attack deaths, and 2020 there were 1011, and in 2021 there were 1086, and in 2022 there were 1197, etc. that would be a big increase in "excess" deaths but not anywhere near as big an increase in total or per capita deaths. Without knowing the actual total or per capita numbers, we can't see what the actual increase was.
That's not really that surprising, and not anywhere near as shocking as the "1000%" headline number makes it sound.
[ + ] canbot
[ - ] canbot [op] 1 point 6 monthsDec 4, 2024 17:48:23 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] iSnark
[ - ] iSnark 0 points 6 monthsDec 4, 2024 04:02:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 0 points 6 monthsDec 4, 2024 14:48:16 ago (+0/-0)
It is a shocking increase, though by itself doesn't point to much. Seen as part of a whole, where you also account for all the other issues like heart disease, neuro disease, etc etc, it is indicative of something seriously wrong as many of these things are seeing a like-increase in numbers.
And remember, these are the deaths, not the number of heart-attacks, which are surprisingly survivable if you live in a dense area with hospitals and help within reach wherever you are, modern medicine being what it is.
He does point out that there's a research paper, fully peer reviewed and published, that points directly to the vax causing this. While the big scare number he uses is tick-tock-tier dumbassery for the clicks, he does at least give some solid numbers and at least one solid way to start your own research if you are so inclined to actually learn more(rare).
You have to go beyond first-order thinking. You must learn multi-variate thinking if you want to see the whole picture. Focusing on one point, like this guy, is a logical trap. It's an important step in learning of course, but there is more, so much more to learn.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 6 monthsDec 4, 2024 15:10:01 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] RMGoetbbels
[ - ] RMGoetbbels 1 point 6 monthsDec 4, 2024 14:29:44 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] SumerBreeze
[ - ] SumerBreeze 1 point 6 monthsDec 4, 2024 13:11:13 ago (+1/-0)
Great finishing statement!
[ + ] Drstrangestgov
[ - ] Drstrangestgov 1 point 6 monthsDec 4, 2024 09:03:15 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 1 point 6 monthsDec 4, 2024 09:19:44 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Hoobeejoo
[ - ] Hoobeejoo 1 point 6 monthsDec 4, 2024 08:56:06 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 0 points 6 monthsDec 4, 2024 21:30:13 ago (+0/-0)