[ - ] Moravian 1 point 4 monthsFeb 6, 2025 00:21:27 ago (+1/-0)
The only thing you owe them is to take care of the jews that used your intelligence organizations to subvert and destroy their countries even more than they could do on their own by supporting the Contra's and other POS leaders. Read the book Economic Hitmen. Watch the Chip Tatum interview with Ted Gunderson.
[ - ] glooper 1 point 4 monthsFeb 5, 2025 17:36:41 ago (+1/-0)
Fuck off. You are either a shill or have a child like understanding of the relationship between the US and central and south america.
You are absolutely right the US has "meddled" in affairs in various southern countries, but it was to stop massive corruption, widespread oppression and gov run fucking death squads, for fucks's sake.
So, with your comment, you are telling me, you supported all that. You supported the the govs and regimes that tanked their countries econns, caused famine and wide spread missilery, controlled folks by piling bodies in the ditches by the thousands...
Fuck off...
And boo fucking whooo. too your your next juvenile argument about the US corporations moving in and "exploiting".... So, american corps came in and provided 10,000 of thousands of jobs for all the locals and a tax base that was way and above anything the local encons were providing. Boo fucking hoo.
I tend to lean into social contract theory to answer these kinds of thoughts.
A right is only a right insofar as it is enforced through social contract. Anyone claiming something is a right is voicing a perception that our current culture has innate social contracts enforcing the condition.
We see laws related to child care and the willingness from society to enact those laws through jail time, fines, etc.
The more and more immigrants are brought into society without the proper time needed to assimilate into the social contracts, the more we see those social contracts erode. If the majority of people no longer believe something is a 'right' to the point it is no longer enforced, it ceases to be a right. And vice versa. A group may establish 'rights' by establishing social contracts in society.
You can always have violation of rights, and the recourse is through whatever societal mechanisms that exist.
[ + ] Hobama
[ - ] Hobama 1 point 4 monthsFeb 6, 2025 03:29:18 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Moravian
[ - ] Moravian 1 point 4 monthsFeb 6, 2025 00:21:27 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 [op] 1 point 4 monthsFeb 6, 2025 11:42:26 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Moravian
[ - ] Moravian 1 point 4 monthsFeb 7, 2025 10:36:07 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 [op] 1 point 4 monthsFeb 7, 2025 13:19:34 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 4 monthsFeb 5, 2025 14:42:16 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] glooper
[ - ] glooper 1 point 4 monthsFeb 5, 2025 17:36:41 ago (+1/-0)
You are absolutely right the US has "meddled" in affairs in various southern countries, but it was to stop massive corruption, widespread oppression and gov run fucking death squads, for fucks's sake.
So, with your comment, you are telling me, you supported all that. You supported the the govs and regimes that tanked their countries econns, caused famine and wide spread missilery, controlled folks by piling bodies in the ditches by the thousands...
Fuck off...
And boo fucking whooo. too your your next juvenile argument about the US corporations moving in and "exploiting".... So, american corps came in and provided 10,000 of thousands of jobs for all the locals and a tax base that was way and above anything the local encons were providing. Boo fucking hoo.
Go snort cock, you insufferable efag...
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull 3 points 4 monthsFeb 5, 2025 18:33:08 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] jfroybees
[ - ] jfroybees 2 points 4 monthsFeb 5, 2025 20:32:36 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 2 points 4 monthsFeb 5, 2025 22:03:38 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] jfroybees
[ - ] jfroybees 3 points 4 monthsFeb 5, 2025 22:52:37 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 4 monthsFeb 5, 2025 17:48:47 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] goatfugee12
[ - ] goatfugee12 3 points 4 monthsFeb 5, 2025 14:26:57 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Reunto
[ - ] Reunto 7 points 4 monthsFeb 5, 2025 13:25:12 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] s23erdctfvyg
[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 2 points 4 monthsFeb 6, 2025 05:24:01 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] BitterVeteran
[ - ] BitterVeteran 1 point 4 monthsFeb 6, 2025 11:55:40 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Reunto
[ - ] Reunto 0 points 4 monthsFeb 7, 2025 00:35:16 ago (+0/-0)
A right is only a right insofar as it is enforced through social contract. Anyone claiming something is a right is voicing a perception that our current culture has innate social contracts enforcing the condition.
We see laws related to child care and the willingness from society to enact those laws through jail time, fines, etc.
The more and more immigrants are brought into society without the proper time needed to assimilate into the social contracts, the more we see those social contracts erode. If the majority of people no longer believe something is a 'right' to the point it is no longer enforced, it ceases to be a right. And vice versa. A group may establish 'rights' by establishing social contracts in society.
You can always have violation of rights, and the recourse is through whatever societal mechanisms that exist.
[ + ] BushChuck5002
[ - ] BushChuck5002 4 points 4 monthsFeb 5, 2025 13:08:35 ago (+7/-3)