Ya I remember that guy. He killed himself because the Feds were threatening him with life in prison. He was one of the original reddit co-founders too. He claimed to believe that the internet should be free for everyone and there shouldn't be any paywalls for tax payer funded peer reviewed journals. Funniest part is now reddit is talking about implementing a paywall. Fucking hilarious.
Feds offered him 3 months. Being a felon was a worse fate for him than killing himself.
He scammed his way into getting 'founder' status after his site failed. His finance guy also financed the reddit kids, so the deal was for him to "become a reddit founder" and he'd help with programming.
Except, shortly after getting founder status, he took off to Thailand and told reddit to fuck off, he was never coming back. 2005 reddit was full of office chatter about his drama.
There were some loose rumors that he discovered something pretty bad going on, and before he could out it, he was threatened and ran the fuck out of there. Is any of that true?
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 15:04:41 ago (+1/-0)
I don't remember if his reason for taking off was discussed. At the time it was just office talk among the employees, and there were more interesting posts.
If I had to guess, it might have had to do with user privacy, given how they later were caught editing posts by trumpstein supporters. It was so small back then that they had no influence outside of the site itself.
The seasonal waves of students joining and then the digg invasion were still in the future in 2005.
Okay true the offer was 6 months in a minimum security but he went to trial instead and faced upwards to 35 years and a fine of 1 million. He wanted to fight but he couldn't deal. Can't expect much from a kike in the end.
That's helpful. I've been building a bot into GoatMatrix that uses RAG. So basically it has a lot of books. I've been "accessing" a lot of books lately. I'll have to see if some of the more expensive books I struggled "afford" are there.
Did you know that the Encyclopedia of Cancer is $3000.
[ - ] canbot 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 16:45:26 ago (+1/-0)
I never heard of terrain theory before, at least as a field onto itself. I have heard arguments here and there that would fall under that umbrella, but never came accross any research that approached any specific problem from that angle.
Personally I have had similar hypotheses, specifically that aging microbiome has a lot of influence on health.
Can you share what you find most convincing about it. Is there any research you can point to that is particularly interesting?
Have you heard of Jamie Andrews? He's the team leader for "The Virology Control Studies" which basically addresses everything that is wrong with the scientific methods used from Pasteur to modern day germ theorists:
It's the closest you'll get to an official study since they would never get published by any "official" big pharma controlled journal. TBH you need properly working critical thinking skills more than anything to deconstruct germ theory, there's so much pseudo-science summed up as "trust us bro" in that field, once someone starts to dig deep and look at the scientific methods employed in many studies used a the founding blocs of germ theory, it starts to unravel by itself.
What do you know about Pasteur and his experiments? The methodology employed? The only way he ever "provoked" diseases in animals was by injecting them directly with a barbiturate of dead cell matter from many sources, fermented together with a touch of toxins.
No virus has ever been 1. isolated and 2. transmission has never been proven. We're just told repeatedly that they have but no study can prove it due to fraudulent methodology.
[ - ] Ragnar 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 20:53:27 ago (+1/-0)
Hmm, I am one of those who don’t outright reject the theory but also don’t know the details. May I ask how do you explain common cold and flu people get every winter using the terrain theory?
Sorry, but if your argument for terrain theory is to talk shit about germ theory that is a huge red flag. First off something else being wrong is not an argument for your thing being right. Second, this type of argument is the basis for a lot of fraud, scams, and cyops because it is very easy to manufacture doubt and it avoids the need to prove anything yourself.
I was hoping you had some interesting studies I could look into. Thanks anyway.
If you need a peer reviewed study to begin to question big pharma's business model, you deserve to be their fucking slave, poisoning your body with their petro-chemical drugs and your mind with their constant fear mongering. Out of all the places you'd think users would be open to questioning dogmatic beliefs, you morons keep demonstrating how hopelessly fucked humanity is.
[ - ] canbot 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 23:36:14 ago (+1/-0)
We are open to questioning mainstream bullshit. That does not mean we are gullible and you can just sell your own bullshit. You would have better luck on Reddit, or any left wing website. People here demand logical arguments, not name calling and slander.
[ - ] x0x7 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 20:36:36 ago (+1/-0)
Hey man. I'm just trying to subvert copyright. You know it's their exclusivity of their particular knowledge that affords them power and a claim at being experts. Break the cycle. The whole stack from researchers to publishers to doctors benefit from that exclusivity.
The judeo-satanists blaming cancer upon our genes is predictable.
Deceiving humans to blame our design, our Gods. While covering up the fact that cancer is caused by well poisons.
Remember when they blamed the sun for skin cancer? Whereas that vitamin d blocks cancer and now skin cancer is as high as ever and everyone is short on vit d
Cures aren't a constant revenue stream. Someone who cured their cancer via alternative means is a threat to their very existence of that information spreads far and wide.
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 3 monthsFeb 20, 2025 12:31:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 18:41:02 ago (+1/-0)
https://open-slum.org/
[ + ] Rotteuxx
[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 18:51:03 ago (+1/-0)
Looks like Anna's the healthiest anyways.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 18:52:06 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 18:42:09 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 20:12:44 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 3 points 4 monthsFeb 18, 2025 09:48:50 ago (+3/-0)*
[ + ] Rotteuxx
[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] 3 points 4 monthsFeb 18, 2025 09:52:56 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] inaminit
[ - ] inaminit 3 points 4 monthsFeb 18, 2025 10:01:43 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] NeonGreen
[ - ] NeonGreen 4 points 4 monthsFeb 18, 2025 11:27:58 ago (+4/-0)
Aaron Swartz - The internet's own boy. So this documentary like 11 years ago. That's pretty decent.
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama 2 points 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 12:44:09 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 2 points 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 13:21:30 ago (+2/-0)
He scammed his way into getting 'founder' status after his site failed. His finance guy also financed the reddit kids, so the deal was for him to "become a reddit founder" and he'd help with programming.
Except, shortly after getting founder status, he took off to Thailand and told reddit to fuck off, he was never coming back. 2005 reddit was full of office chatter about his drama.
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 14:46:10 ago (+1/-0)
There were some loose rumors that he discovered something pretty bad going on, and before he could out it, he was threatened and ran the fuck out of there. Is any of that true?
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 15:04:41 ago (+1/-0)
If I had to guess, it might have had to do with user privacy, given how they later were caught editing posts by trumpstein supporters. It was so small back then that they had no influence outside of the site itself.
The seasonal waves of students joining and then the digg invasion were still in the future in 2005.
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 15:22:00 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama 0 points 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 18:46:53 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 5 points 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 13:20:34 ago (+5/-0)
Did you know that the Encyclopedia of Cancer is $3000.
[ + ] Rotteuxx
[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] 8 points 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 13:52:45 ago (+8/-0)
Not to sound snide but I've been diving into terrain theory a lot & get annoyed with the official cancer stance.
[ + ] canbot
[ - ] canbot 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 16:45:26 ago (+1/-0)
Personally I have had similar hypotheses, specifically that aging microbiome has a lot of influence on health.
Can you share what you find most convincing about it. Is there any research you can point to that is particularly interesting?
[ + ] Rotteuxx
[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] 0 points 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 18:00:54 ago (+0/-0)
https://controlstudies.substack.com/
It's the closest you'll get to an official study since they would never get published by any "official" big pharma controlled journal. TBH you need properly working critical thinking skills more than anything to deconstruct germ theory, there's so much pseudo-science summed up as "trust us bro" in that field, once someone starts to dig deep and look at the scientific methods employed in many studies used a the founding blocs of germ theory, it starts to unravel by itself.
What do you know about Pasteur and his experiments? The methodology employed? The only way he ever "provoked" diseases in animals was by injecting them directly with a barbiturate of dead cell matter from many sources, fermented together with a touch of toxins.
No virus has ever been 1. isolated and 2. transmission has never been proven. We're just told repeatedly that they have but no study can prove it due to fraudulent methodology.
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 20:53:27 ago (+1/-0)
May I ask how do you explain common cold and flu people get every winter using the terrain theory?
[ + ] Rotteuxx
[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] 0 points 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 21:05:35 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 0 points 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 23:54:35 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Rotteuxx
[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] 0 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 06:49:56 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] canbot
[ - ] canbot 0 points 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 22:16:22 ago (+0/-0)
I was hoping you had some interesting studies I could look into. Thanks anyway.
[ + ] Rotteuxx
[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] -2 points 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 22:26:01 ago (+0/-2)
If you need a peer reviewed study to begin to question big pharma's business model, you deserve to be their fucking slave, poisoning your body with their petro-chemical drugs and your mind with their constant fear mongering. Out of all the places you'd think users would be open to questioning dogmatic beliefs, you morons keep demonstrating how hopelessly fucked humanity is.
[ + ] canbot
[ - ] canbot 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 23:36:14 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Rotteuxx
[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] 0 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 06:52:52 ago (+0/-0)
I linked you to a a ressource that has all the answers you're looking for but you conpletely ignored it, instead asking to be spoonfed on here.
Your loss.
[ + ] canbot
[ - ] canbot 0 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 14:10:17 ago (+0/-0)
I'm interested in people studying something scientifically. Your entire claim appears to be "hur der dat stupid therfore my wild claims are true".
[ + ] Rotteuxx
[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] -1 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 15:07:45 ago (+0/-1)
You glanced at the container and rejected the scientific contents.
Then you bitch and whine about wanting scientific studies.
WTF is wrong with you?
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 1 point 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 20:36:36 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 23:32:59 ago (+0/-0)
Deceiving humans to blame our design, our Gods.
While covering up the fact that cancer is caused by well poisons.
Remember when they blamed the sun for skin cancer? Whereas that vitamin d blocks cancer and now skin cancer is as high as ever and everyone is short on vit d
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 3 monthsFeb 20, 2025 12:35:00 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Rotteuxx
[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] 0 points 3 monthsFeb 18, 2025 18:52:35 ago (+0/-0)