Sign into an existing account

The concept behind inoculation is sound thus vaccination is sensible, the issue is which ones and their frequency becaude corruption and pure profiteering has ruled the industry and regulation for decades now.

That and obviously some things they call vaccines aren't vaccines.

mRNA jabs aren't vaccines, most jabs contain toxins on purpose designed to induce an immune response so that the weakened or dead inoculating substance is more likely to get noticed by the immune system and integrated. These toxins which are typically toxic metals have a compounding effect and there has been no research on what micro-dosing the toxic non metallic additives does to the body or mind.

The rational step here is to review the vaccine schedule cut a portion out, and spread the rest out over a much longer time scale. The immune response itself is likely responsible for the damage and epigenetic issues so we need to shift into collecting more detailed data.

Immigration control and FDA veto of migrants from active infection zones needs to become a thing. Other steps in this regard could be necessary too.

As to measles it can damage your immune system and cause you to lose immunity to a variety of viruses, the mechanism isn't completely understood but that would be massively counter productive to reducing immune stress and vaccination total and frequency so no matter how toxic(not very) the measles vaccine is necessary.

🤣🤣🤣do you think he took this position for your sake? oh boy people are so deluded