×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
4

Terminology change needed? Races versus breeds

submitted by Panic to Discussion 1 monthMar 20, 2025 13:12:12 ago (+4/-0)     (Discussion)

With people, we claim to have different races and are taught that everybody is the same. But all other animals have varieties called 'breeds'. Google AI admits different breeds of dogs have different temperaments and talents. From Google Search:
do different dog breeds have different temperaments and talents
Reply: Yes, different dog breeds often exhibit distinct temperaments and talents, stemming from their selective breeding for specific purposes like herding, hunting, or companionship.

Thus, jews act like jews, Mexicans act like Mexicans etc. Breeding explains this.


8 comments block


[ - ] Ducktalesooo000ooo 6 points 1 monthMar 20, 2025 13:26:14 ago (+6/-0)

Lol it’s probably “species”.

[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 0 points 1 monthMar 20, 2025 17:16:30 ago (+0/-0)

In regard to the negro, it's explicitly species - as in they are definably not a member of Homo Sapien with a genetic divergence not found in any racial subset of the Human animal. The negro's divergence from Homo Sapien varies up to 19%, a difference as profound as that between a wolf and a coyote.

The remainder of the races within Homo Sapien are connected by genetic commonality; breed or race, makes no difference in regard to how one refers to it when the term race has become meaningless in modern society and pozzed leftist science.

[ - ] Ducktalesooo000ooo 0 points 1 monthMar 20, 2025 17:25:36 ago (+0/-0)

All that research was done under (((liberal))) academic regimes in the last 200 years or so i imagine…. We will have to do it all again.

I don’t disagree about niggers… i just don’t want to use the term “homo sapiens” at all if it included other species at one point.

[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 0 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 08:23:55 ago (+0/-0)

I can't play the we know nothing about anything game.
If our most accurate information about the human animal comes from before 1825, there's no point in bothering even discussing the topic on social media because no one knows anything anyway.

The claim about the distinction between the African and the Human comes from scientific claims surfaced in the past five years where they said up 19% of the African DNA belongs to an extinct hominid not present in any human.

https://www.sci.news/genetics/west-africans-dna-archaic-hominin-08123.html

They may refuse to connect the dots.
They may use the word race.

But like I said, a wolf and a coyote are also 19% distinct.
That 19% represents an entirely distinct species and as far as I'm concerned, modern science just codified that fact.

As for the remainder of the hominid population on earth; I don't care how they're categorized. My value is both inherent and apparent in isolation or as a drawn contrast. I'm not threatened, harmed, or particularly bothered by calling any racial subset human if the observations regarding their genetic material are classified according to the same rules as the rest of the class Mammalia.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 3 points 1 monthMar 20, 2025 14:34:29 ago (+3/-0)

Species. There are five species-level distinctions among humanity. Caucasoids, negroids, mongoloids, australoids, and americoids. Within these are a few subspecies each.

[ - ] xmasskull 2 points 1 monthMar 20, 2025 13:25:04 ago (+2/-0)

New sign:

No Dark Breeds!

Works?

[ - ] Puller_of_Noses 1 point 1 monthMar 20, 2025 18:50:01 ago (+1/-0)

There is a greater difference between negroes and Whites genetically than between coyotes and wolves.
We are a different species.

[ - ] VitaminSieg 0 points 1 monthMar 20, 2025 16:54:35 ago (+0/-0)

But all other animals have varieties called 'breeds'.

No. Only domesticated animals are breeds. Non-whites are savages.