One trick I see coming up a lot that jews and their lackeys like to use is when they will ask a question so basic with an answer so obvious,you don't really think about it much as something to argue so you don't really have an answer. More over,you're stunned someone would even ask a question that simple.
It first struck me when Bill Clintion stated "That depends on what your definition of "is" is." This is a stupid question on a lot of levels,the primary one being that everyone knows the definition of "is". Another being that he used the word in the sentence so he obviously knows it's meaning. But the big thing to me is that I realized while I knew what the word meant,I couldn't actually define it. It's such a basic word,you don't really think about it. It's obvious and plain and so you're not really ready when someone asks.
And they do this a lot. Asking the most basic questions. Things like "why can't we just print more money?" We're all aware why and we also know when someone asks this question earnestly,we're dealing with a massive idiot. And it follows the pattern of "make arguments that are simple to state but require a great deal of effort to explain".
Which is why we find memes so effective. They can boil down long winded arguments into simple,effective retorts that take no effort to explain. You just post the picture and done. And the left can't meme because their lies take a lot of bullshit to twist reality to suit them.
So if you take some time to stop and think about the nonsense questions they ask about remedial shit,you can make effective memes that tear through them as easily as they ask them. And that's why it's important to remember to cover the basics.
a) For ones perception...all WAS perceivable before another can suggest what it IS.
b) To define implies "to end; to mark the limit; to affix"...all perceivable moves through ones perception and hence cannot be affixed. A jew tempts gentiles to ignore perceivable (inspiration) by holding onto suggested (information).
c) Nature moves sound...a jew shapes words within sound to distract gentiles with definitions, consenting to which, shapes one into a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
everyone knows the definition
To know implies to perceive perceivable, which holding onto a suggested definition tempts one to ignore.
Asking the most basic questions
To ask implies another; to question implies towards outcome...the basic of being implies ones response (perception) to origin (perceivable), while resisting the temptation of others (suggestion).
why can't we just print more money
Because in nature...current implies loss (inception towards death) for growth (life). One cannot print more loss; only lose more growth. Ones consent to a suggested currency tempts one to ignore that, while permitting others to print more loss than growth.
Print/imprimo - "to press forward" implies impression (inception towards death) pressing expressions (life) forwards. That's how nature prints temporary growth (living) during ongoing loss (dying) simultaneously.
We're all aware
a) Awareness implies each ones perception of all perceivable aka singularity...not plurality.
b) There's no "we" or "us" in nature; only each one (partial effect) within all (whole cause). A jew suggests "we the people" and "us aka united states" to tempt consenting gentiles together.
follows the pattern
Nature moves each being from inception towards death. Pattern implies "original proposed for imitation" aka ones perception imitating the origin of all perceivable...not following along the suggestions of others towards death.
no effort to explain
As EX-pression (life) within impressing PLAIN (inception towards death)...fertility is based on effort.
Nature doesn't need to be explained to one another; nature forces each one to adapt, even while ignored for one another's explanations.
if you take some time to stop...
...then you ignore that nature cannot be stopped by those being (life) moved (inception towards death) within.
If you take some time, then does your heart stop or are you tricking yourself to mentally ignore motion?
What everyone calls memes are actually "infographics".
An infographic may "go viral" and become a "meme", but is not inherently memetic.
This is what I have noticed. A generalized infantilization of the language. The new brain rot speak is a near peak example of this doubleplusgood newspeak bullshit.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 monthsMar 21, 2025 16:40:35 ago (+0/-0)
a) For ones perception...all WAS perceivable before another can suggest what it IS.
b) To define implies "to end; to mark the limit; to affix"...all perceivable moves through ones perception and hence cannot be affixed. A jew tempts gentiles to ignore perceivable (inspiration) by holding onto suggested (information).
c) Nature moves sound...a jew shapes words within sound to distract gentiles with definitions, consenting to which, shapes one into a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
To know implies to perceive perceivable, which holding onto a suggested definition tempts one to ignore.
To ask implies another; to question implies towards outcome...the basic of being implies ones response (perception) to origin (perceivable), while resisting the temptation of others (suggestion).
Because in nature...current implies loss (inception towards death) for growth (life). One cannot print more loss; only lose more growth. Ones consent to a suggested currency tempts one to ignore that, while permitting others to print more loss than growth.
Print/imprimo - "to press forward" implies impression (inception towards death) pressing expressions (life) forwards. That's how nature prints temporary growth (living) during ongoing loss (dying) simultaneously.
a) Awareness implies each ones perception of all perceivable aka singularity...not plurality.
b) There's no "we" or "us" in nature; only each one (partial effect) within all (whole cause). A jew suggests "we the people" and "us aka united states" to tempt consenting gentiles together.
Nature moves each being from inception towards death. Pattern implies "original proposed for imitation" aka ones perception imitating the origin of all perceivable...not following along the suggestions of others towards death.
As EX-pression (life) within impressing PLAIN (inception towards death)...fertility is based on effort.
Nature doesn't need to be explained to one another; nature forces each one to adapt, even while ignored for one another's explanations.
...then you ignore that nature cannot be stopped by those being (life) moved (inception towards death) within.
If you take some time, then does your heart stop or are you tricking yourself to mentally ignore motion?
[ + ] Merlynn
[ - ] Merlynn [op] 0 points 2 monthsMar 23, 2025 04:29:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 monthsMar 23, 2025 07:14:20 ago (+0/-0)
a) How can "non" be sensed?
b) Kind of like what is "non" comparable to?
[ + ] Merlynn
[ - ] Merlynn [op] 0 points 2 monthsMar 23, 2025 07:54:56 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Cantaloupe
[ - ] Cantaloupe 1 point 2 monthsMar 21, 2025 18:36:42 ago (+1/-0)
Clinton used the technique he did because of a complex-question i.e.
have you stopped beating your wife yes or no??
It's not basic - it's fundamental and succinct. A long blathering answer is far less effective.
[ + ] Merlynn
[ - ] Merlynn [op] 1 point 2 monthsMar 23, 2025 04:31:48 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] BushChuck5002
[ - ] BushChuck5002 -1 points 2 monthsMar 23, 2025 08:26:52 ago (+0/-1)
A "meme" is a reproducing idea.
What everyone calls memes are actually "infographics".
An infographic may "go viral" and become a "meme", but is not inherently memetic.
This is what I have noticed. A generalized infantilization of the language. The new brain rot speak is a near peak example of this doubleplusgood newspeak bullshit.