Remove Signal from all government devices ASAP! Assume anything the Biden/autopen administration approved has hidden traps in it just for Trump's administration!
Trump and the entire world already knew by 2017 that Signal was completely compromised by the Feds for a couple years, when WikiLeaks proved it in the Vault 7 dump.
It's obvious someone on the thread regularly texted the Editor in question. Theyre all denying it and the editor can't disclose who his source was. I don't know if it was Hegseth or someone else but it's a pretty simple mistake. There's also a NIST standard for out of band communications like this tho they misused it to do a little backpatting. Signal is the best of several bad solutions and all tech companies are going to have a ton of Jews on their boards. The Pentagon should create an out of band solution that can be used off government networks or in a sandbox like environment on govt devices.
The NIST standard is specifically to create alt comms channels in the event official channels are compromised, ie someone is investigating a breach on govt networks and needs to work with others without immediately notifying the intruder on the network.
Yeah, why does he have the editor in his contact list anyway and also for the signal app? - Using non-official channels for high level/ critical communications could also suggest they were purposely attempting to not have this and or other conversations routinely noted if using official govt channels - so zero official use/ paper trail. (Ie a FOIA might only cover approved official Governmental communications??). Why would they not use an authorized and presumably secure govt communication channel unless the signal app is considered an official govt communication platform ?
What is unclear to me is WHO had the editor in his contact list - Hegseth or the NSA guy? Or did someone else on the thread add him? I don't know if that's been confirmed.
Yes, that seems to be entirely missing from every article. So far i have heard two different possibly plausible explanations - but none by those actually involved.
I guess add an unlikely third for full disclosure - a deliberate tapping into the thread.
My guess is someone just typed in GOL given how many DoD insiders have that name and the editors name popped up and they just added him. Part of the thread is just people listing off their top points of contact. If they were ccing those people I can see this mistake easily being made (by a retard but easily nonetheless). More likely it was the originator of the thread though, which I thought was Waltz and not Hegseth.
I remember posting on voat years ago that it was run by jews. Someone on old voat was bitching to putitout that people were going to not trust trust Signal and were afraid it would make people not use it.
Signal has been pozzed from the start - common knowledge among tech people. That's why the tech people who just got into the government and discovered that the feds used fucking Signal instead of a custom in-house fed chat tool, set this scam up. They will now push to get funding to develop and mandate the use of a fed-controlled system.
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 5 points 1 monthMar 27, 2025 14:24:35 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 3 points 1 monthMar 27, 2025 14:56:27 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 2 points 1 monthMar 27, 2025 23:02:20 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Storefront
[ - ] Storefront 2 points 1 monthMar 27, 2025 16:23:03 ago (+2/-0)
The NIST standard is specifically to create alt comms channels in the event official channels are compromised, ie someone is investigating a breach on govt networks and needs to work with others without immediately notifying the intruder on the network.
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 2 points 1 monthMar 27, 2025 20:29:11 ago (+2/-0)*
Using non-official channels for high level/ critical communications could also suggest they were purposely attempting to not have this and or other conversations routinely noted if using official govt channels - so zero official use/ paper trail. (Ie a FOIA might only cover approved official Governmental communications??).
Why would they not use an authorized and presumably secure govt communication channel unless the signal app is considered an official govt communication platform ?
Just a bad shady look all round.
[ + ] Storefront
[ - ] Storefront 0 points 1 monthMar 28, 2025 15:54:44 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 1 monthMar 28, 2025 16:26:15 ago (+0/-0)
So far i have heard two different possibly plausible explanations - but none by those actually involved.
I guess add an unlikely third for full disclosure - a deliberate tapping into the thread.
I doubt we will ever get to know either.
[ + ] Storefront
[ - ] Storefront 0 points 1 monthMar 28, 2025 17:02:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Empire_of_the_Mind
[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 0 points 1 monthMar 29, 2025 00:36:18 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2025 22:07:25 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Empire_of_the_Mind
[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 1 point 1 monthMar 29, 2025 00:37:24 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ProudRebel
[ - ] ProudRebel 0 points 1 monthMar 27, 2025 19:45:47 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 1 monthMar 28, 2025 16:27:52 ago (+0/-0)