×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
0
7 comments block


[ - ] qwop 1 point 1 monthMar 29, 2025 09:43:00 ago (+1/-0)

Why is this downvoted. Seems like an incredibly important acknowledgement. The first step to fix a problem is to even recognize that it exists.

[ - ] Jinglebanger 0 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 15:38:40 ago (+0/-0)

Every unisolated population decline in history is followed by a huge upswing in prosperity. The issue is that prosperity benefits the average person more so than the elite. The elite is just worried about the GDP so they can keep playing their funny numbers game with money.

The ultimate problem is "they" are trying to buck the natural ebb and flow of population growth. All the little White babies that would have eventually been born have instead been replaced by fully grown browns. Those browns boom instead because their relative wealth has increased while the native population continues to stagnate or decline. So essentially the baby boomer-esque idyllic economic status we would have hit 20-30 years from now has been completely hijacked. And the kicker is, this is being done not because the elites are actually in any real danger, but because they wouldn't make as much money.

Honestly it would take me hours to write out everything this situation affects and why it is happening. But instead think about this: there is no narrative being spun on how to "fix" this situation that doesn't involve importing more niggers, when importing niggers is what ultimately exacerbates the problem. And the people that would traditionally fight against this are being massively gaslit by Trump, Musk, and so forth into thinking this is a necessary step in the survival of our country. From a White perspective, as insane as it might seem in and of itself, we would have been better off if the commies stayed in power, because that at least gave the typical White something easy to rally against. At this point, the extreme left are essentially our remaining hope to stop this, and that is definitely not a situation you ever want to be in.

[ - ] Crackinjokes 0 points 1 monthMar 29, 2025 15:15:39 ago (+0/-0)

If you want to increase the birth rate first you should make giving birth free hospital should not charge 10 to $30,000 per child for you to have a kid. Number two you got to change the alimony requirements so Men actually want to give their sperm to women so they actually want to have kids and they won't feel like they're going to be in prison the rest of their life for doing that.

And quite frankly you got to make birth control illegal. If you give people a chance to turn off their birthing ability and not have any responsibility while they're fucking all the people they want then that's what they'll choose to do.

[ - ] Storefront 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2025 00:49:24 ago (+1/-0)

Both my kids were normal births with no complications and it cost well over $30k both times; I even got a bill for $3,000 for ibuprofen. NYC hospitals. This was 10 or more years ago.

[ - ] Jinglebanger -1 points 1 monthMar 29, 2025 11:04:36 ago (+0/-1)

Population decline is the more retarded, conservative version of global warming.

[ - ] Storefront 0 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 00:56:11 ago (+0/-0)

this

[ - ] localsal -1 points 1 monthMar 29, 2025 09:46:09 ago (+0/-1)

That stupid birth rate issue again. Give it a rest already.

Unless the declining birth rate can be causally traced to infertility in every subsequent generation, there will still be the ability for a woman to have 5 to 10 kids if needed.

Right now, in the developed world, there is no need for more people. All of the land is claimed/settled, the jobs are being done, technology is advancing, etc.

The only thing the stupid birth rate chicken littles are really worried about is the ponzi schemes in government, where the bottom layer of the pyramid (children) need to be more than the older people at the top. Keeping that pyramid shape leads to a dead world.