×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
34

A Roman amulet depicting the (((tribe))), circa 1st century

submitted by UncleDoug to PaganFarmRemembers 1 monthMar 30, 2025 07:00:43 ago (+36/-2)     (files.catbox.moe)

https://files.catbox.moe/kvyoag.PNG

But guys its not the jews, because jew wasnt mentioned in the bible. ~ Christcuck

Its definetely the jews.

Small Roman solid silver amulet of a grotesque head with exaggerated features, circa 1st-2nd century AD. Private Collection. He has a long nose, high cheekbones, and a receding forehead. Grotesques are used to ward off evil and as reminders of the separation of the earth and the divine.

This type of artifact, with its exaggerated facial features, has historically been used to mock and stereotype Jewish people, reinforcing harmful and prejudiced imagery.

Every culture, every religion, and every race contributes uniquely to the collective human consciousness, except for jews and reducing any other group to caricatures only hinders a deeper understanding of our shared history and humanity.

Gas jews now.

In the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament), the term "Jew" (Hebrew: Yehudi) originally referred to people of the Kingdom of Judea or the tribe of Judah, and later extended to the entire Hebrew nation. Other terms used to describe Jewish people include Hebrews, Israelites, and Children of Israel.


21 comments block


[ - ] Zyklonbeekeeper 6 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 09:26:02 ago (+6/-0)

...even General Patton wrote a letter to Truman stating that the town he just recapture had a residence where every jew in the town holed together in the basement, I think total town population was 150 people and there was 20 jews crammed together in this basement and Patton said that the stench was repulsive. There's nothing more dirty than the ✡️ .

[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 4 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 09:44:46 ago (+4/-0)

https://files.catbox.moe/ub3njp.png

It's been the jews for over 2000 years, probably at least 3000. Everystein singleberg fuckingcohen timeowitz.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2025 12:08:50 ago (+1/-0)

Tacitus seems to be observing conversions of other people to judaism.

[ - ] xmasskull 3 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 14:38:57 ago (+3/-0)

Gas jews now! Damn,good idea!

[ - ] the_old_ones 2 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 20:05:50 ago (+2/-0)

if someone can find me more pictures of this thing ill see if i can make it a 3D printable model.

[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2025 22:35:00 ago (+1/-0)

https://x.com/luce_carentes/status/1772266080569864319

[Private collection](https://files.catbox.moe/zay8dr.webp)

Shows more modelling of face, wish I could find more regarding the auction.

[ - ] the_old_ones 0 points 1 monthMar 31, 2025 08:24:09 ago (+0/-0)

bet.

[ - ] TheNoticing 2 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 12:39:32 ago (+2/-0)

gOdS cHoSeN PeOpLe

[ - ] Master_Foo 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2025 10:30:31 ago (+2/-1)

"The Jews back then weren't the same Jews as today" ~ @Love240, 2025

[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 12:05:22 ago (+2/-0)

Thats correct. Genetically provable. But I forgot you don’t care about genes.

[ - ] Master_Foo 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2025 12:18:25 ago (+1/-0)

Where did you hear that it's genetically provable?
I bet it's from someone who is interested in claiming the Jews of the Bible were "Ackshually the REAL Whites".

Go ahead, post your source...

[ - ] Reunto 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2025 13:51:06 ago (+1/-0)

[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 15:25:16 ago (+0/-0)

I think you meant to reply to @PostWallHelena.

Or, alternatively, thanks for proving my point.
10/10

Heil Odin! o/

[ - ] Reunto 0 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 16:40:45 ago (+0/-0)

Ashkenazim are alleged to be some mix of Europeans and Canaanites. Canaanites are supposedly not the same ethnic group as the OT Jews of the Bible.

It gets complicated because OT Jews interbred with many races, especially in cases of diaspora.

But Ashkenazim particularly are alleged to be overwhelmingly European, matrineally.

https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ashkenazi-jewish-ancestry-confirmed-european-by-mtdna-tests/

If Ashkenazim of today are the same ethnicity as OT Jews (especially if we are gauging by a Talmudic matrilineal standard), that would point to the idea that OT Jews were a White race.

If we reject the notion that Ashkenazim matrilineally descend from OT Jews, it suggests that Talmudists have no claim on the basis of their own standards, and that OT Jews were not necessarily White.

We can follow whichever interpretation, but if we accept the evidence there are clearly constraints of the possible ranges of valid interpretations.

Heil Odin!

I'll counter with this: praise be to the perfect being! Creator of all creation! Master of all living!

I'm sure you can tell by the description it doesn't fit Odin.

[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 17:02:17 ago (+0/-0)*

Canaanites are supposedly not the same ethnic group as the OT Jews of the Bible.
Yeah, of course, in reality, we know that the Bible isn't an accurate history.
Of course we know that the Levant is comprised of a bunch of people who formed tribes and warred with each other and inter married with each other, and within the Levant, it's just a bunch of genetic mutts.

A White Nationalist Pagan doesn't really make much of a distinction between Canaanites, and Judeans, and Moabites and Jebusites, etc.

Truth be told, they are all (((Afro-Asiatic Semites))).
The Genetic difference between Jesus and the Samaritan woman was negligible compared to Jesus and a German.

If Ashkenazim of today are the same ethnicity as OT Jews (especially if we are gauging by a Talmudic matrilineal standard), that would point to the idea that OT Jews were a White race.
I'll use my own standard, thank you very much.
It's pretty easy to tell the difference between an Ashcanite and a German.
Likewise, the people (whites) who are interested in creating a future race of Ubermensch will never invite an Ashcainite into the gene pool.

In regards go Ashcanites, that giant fucking honker, low hanging earlobes, and predisposition towards schizophrenia came from somewhere, and that somewhere is the Jews of the Bible.

Ashcanites and Bible Jews are the same people, statistically speaking, when comparing them genetically to the Germanic Volk.

If we reject the notion that Ashkenazim matrilineally descend from OT Jews
There is an easy solution to this problem.
I reject the notion of Talmudism.
I will classify Jews as I see fit.

Talmudists have no claim on the basis of their own standards
Talmudists have no claim on the only basis that matters.
My standard.

You are basically arguing that decendents of African slaves in the united states aren't African... Because something something, your messiah was Shaka Zulu and Shaka Zulu has to be White because you are White.

I'm sure you can tell by the description it doesn't fit Odin.
It doesn't fit the description of any God.
Especially a Jewish-God.
Stop worshipping Jews.
Your God lies to you.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 14:15:23 ago (+0/-0)

Oh, you didn’t know they have the genetics on file for thousands of ancient levantines from every time period from the mesolithic onward? They do. The “jews” of the bible were not a single ethnic group (e.g. patrilineal descendents of abraham.) but various middle eastern ethnicities unified civilly and assimilated culturally, centuries before this culture was monotheistic. Also genetically proveable. Palestinians are the most genetically consistent with roman and iron age levantines, not jews of any kind (even the middle eastern jews). Various subtypes of jews (bukhari, turkish, ashkhenazi, morrocan) cant claim to be closely related to each other at all, except for sephardics and ashkhenazi, who are 50% european.

You would know this if you had done any research on western eurasian archeo-genetics. But you haven’t. Feel free to your own research on this topic. Im sure you will be able to find this data if you are a non-retard. I go to the trouble of finding and linking studies for people that are interested in educating themselves and not mere contrarianism

Why do you believe jews are the same today as they were 2000 or 2500 years ago? Simple, you believe jews. You believe jewish religionists. No scientific source reports that modern jews are the same as iron age jews. You think there is? Go ahead, post your source...

[ - ] Master_Foo 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2025 15:11:08 ago (+1/-0)

Did you notice how you didn't post a source?

I mean, you dumped a wall of text, which is par for the course for someone who doesn't have a source.
Usually that works when you are trying to just get away with bullshit.

But you forgot one important thing.
I'm Voat's official Nooticer.

I nooticed that you didn't actually post a source.
Try again.

[ - ] DukeofRaul 0 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 07:10:31 ago (+0/-0)

Jews?!

[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 12:04:04 ago (+0/-1)

The resemblance to jewish characatures is remarkable but probably nothing more than a coincidence. Ashkhenazis didn’t exist as a people at that time. But lots of mediterraneans have large noses and weak chins.

[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 15:11:11 ago (+0/-0)

You've fallen for the fed trap thinking the jews today aren't the jews from yesteryear. Helena, the AK is just the grotesque caricature above mixed with German in the 10th ce.

This is genetically verifiable and provable beyond any measure of doubt. The biblical jew, its genetic aberration and those fat rubbery lip genes are still present, even when you replace half the genetic phenotype with a different genetic group, the biblical group of jews that inhabited the Levant still lives on.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 1 monthMar 30, 2025 16:34:09 ago (+0/-0)

We’ve had this conversation before. AJs are only 50% middle eastern. Who knows how much of that is specifically canaanite? The religion was proselytizing for centuries. Palestinians are the most like jews of yesteryear , in a genetic sense.

Helena, the AK is just the grotesque caricature above mixed with German in the 10th ce.

Or people in different places and times have similar ideas of what makes a face look grotesque? This face is consistent with a mediterranean phenotype. Practically any mediterranean ethnic group. Youve never seen an Italian that looked like this guy? I call bullshit.

This is genetically verifiable and provable beyond any measure of doubt.

No it is not. The 11th cent. bottleneck hypothesis does not specify when European DNA was introduced into that population. It certainly doesn’t specify that its German. Some have speculated its German due to early Ashkhenazi living in the “ShWM” cities (Speyer, Worms, Mainz). Other studies claim its northern italian ancestry. Im inclined to believe Jews in Europe assimilated European DNA at different times and places as well as additional DNA from non-levantine middle eastern, north african and anatolian sources.

Lots of people around the med have those fat rubbery lips.

Youre insistence that jews are the same as ancient jehudahites, despite all the evidence to the contrary, is motivated by your incorrect belief that jews must have come from an evil seed population which is canaanite. That theory doesnt account for why jews are much worse than palestinians rather than the other way around. Since palestinians have a “double dose” of ancient jew, why are they not running wall street? Furthermore, it kicks the can down the road as to how ancient jews got to be so bad in the first place. Can you explain the selection process that led to ancient jews evolving into the evil people that AJs are?

The jewish diaspora out of palestine in the 2nd cent. was not drawn from a cross section of the judean population (farmers, carpenters, fishermen, etc)— it was drawn from religious elites and other wealthy adherents. They joined other jewish communities in foreign countries that already had ancestry from foreign converts from places like turkey greece, iraq, egypt, italy, etc. Who know which of these communties contributed to the AJ bottleneck population? Not you.

AJs and other jews are selected for traits like zealousness, xenophobia, paranoia, clericalism, rent seeking economic strategies, and itinerancy. This selection process occured at the expulsion after the Bar Kohba revolt and at many other subsequent expulsions that followed. Its the selection process on the diaspora that has shaped AJs. Similar selection processes led to other shitty groups like the gypsies.

Imagine if you seeded a white population with only people employed by the DNC and federal workers. Maybe sociology professors. All 100% White. Thats gives you some idea of types of people who contributed to the diaspora initially. The expulsion was more of a political purge than a racial one. In fact it wasn’t a racial purge at all. It was not the average person on the street. That is why parts of the bible seem to speak of two different kind of jews: 1. The people of palestine/canaan who worshipped yahweh and 2. A partisan religio-political elite, i.e. synogogue of satan. The majority of people who worshipped Yahweh in the 1st millenium BC are the ancestors of palestinians.