What is more likely? - Upgoat - "where a goat can be a goat"

You are starting with a false premise that shows you know nothing about how history works.

Why would you exclude the books of the Bible as sources of historical information?

[ + ] mahavishnunj

[ - ] mahavishnunj 1 point 1 weekApr 20, 2025 16:05:12 ago (+1/-0)

You're seriously retarded enough to use the bible as a source for anything? It's more legitimate to use Lord of the Rings as a source. If the Jesus shit is real, why is there ZERO evidence aside from the laughable fantasy book?

[ + ] Reunto

[ - ] Reunto -1 points 1 weekApr 20, 2025 16:16:38 ago (+0/-1)

You haven't answered the question and that's why no one takes you seriously.

[ + ] mahavishnunj

[ - ] mahavishnunj 1 point 1 weekApr 20, 2025 16:26:53 ago (+1/-0)

Ok, I'll answer the dumb question from the imbecile who hasn't been able to follow a word of this-

Recorded history works by being recorded. It's right there in the title, do I need to break it down more for you? Apparently, since each reply shows you're even more out of your depth than I previously thought. At first I thought it was just ignorance, now it's clear I'm dealing with an actual retarded person.

Since we've established RECORDED HISTORY is history, that has been recorded, now show me where I have been incorrect with anything I've said. I'm sure all the people not taking me seriously will laugh their asses off at me actually requesting evidence, logic, anything and nobody being able to answer. Let's see what you've got genius, actual evidence. With a source. That isn't the joke book.

[ + ] Reunto

[ - ] Reunto -1 points 1 weekApr 20, 2025 16:37:08 ago (+0/-1)

You're missing what I'm asking. What is recorded history? How do you think recorded history is compiled? On what grounds are you excluding the Bible?

The Bible is a collection of recorded works attesting to different figures and happenings. Now explain why you would exclude the Bible as a source of historical information.

where I have been incorrect with anything I've said

Your exclusion criteria for sources, mainly because you are ignorant of the processes involved with history.

You have no idea how history actually works.

[ + ] mahavishnunj

[ - ] mahavishnunj 1 point 1 weekApr 20, 2025 16:41:59 ago (+1/-0)

"Now explain why you would exclude the Bible as a source of historical information."
If you're seriously asking that, you are incapable of processing the most basic of information. Wow, lol.
The only thing you could've posted that would be more mindboggling is....
"You have no idea how history actually works."

I couldn't script this better myself! Keep going, these are amazing.

[ + ] Reunto

[ - ] Reunto -1 points 1 weekApr 20, 2025 16:52:57 ago (+0/-1)

You still haven't answered the question. You never will, because you don't understand the topic.

[ - ] Reunto 1 point 1 weekApr 20, 2025 12:51:04 ago (+1/-0)

How @Master_Foo imagines the disciples lied:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=23UNLLbOS3w

[ + ] Master_Foo

[ - ] Master_Foo [op] 1 point 1 weekApr 20, 2025 15:44:49 ago (+1/-0)

It's funny because John was the only deciple that wasn't brutally killed.

What should we think about a group of Jews that everyone hated so much that 11/12 of them died a torturous death?
At least Judas had enough sense to hang himself.

[ - ] inaminit 2 points 1 weekApr 20, 2025 12:27:14 ago (+3/-1)

Polls are pointless without a fuck you option.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 2 points 1 weekApr 20, 2025 13:11:02 ago (+4/-2)

strawman, false dichotomy

What’s more likely:

1. You’re a paid jewish shill for saying things only paid jewish shills have ever said
2. You’re a paid jewish shill for saying things only paid jewish shills have ever said

Sign into an existing account

What is more likely? submitted by Master_Foo to Christcucks 1 weekApr 20, 2025 12:20:33 ago (+3/-6) (Christcucks)

What is more likely?
submitted by Master_Foo to Christcucks 1 weekApr 20, 2025 12:20:33 ago (+3/-6) (Christcucks)