☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
30

Warrantless drone use by police against citizens in their home ruled illegal by Michigan appeals court

submitted by Crackinjokes to news 1 monthApr 27, 2025 04:41:40 ago (+30/-0)     (komornlaw.com)

https://komornlaw.com/search-seizure-government-use-of-drones/

By the way this is a good website with coverage of a lot of legal developments. I don't know whether they just pertain to Michigan or not though.


11 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] Jimmycrackerson 4 points 1 monthApr 27, 2025 07:31:04 ago (+4/-0)

Every zogbot and judge involved up to appeals should be drawn and quartered.

[ - ] yesiknow 4 points 1 monthApr 27, 2025 04:47:17 ago (+4/-0)

How do you end up with a police agency that wants to have their drones in your house? Oh yeah, feminist followers. "Save me daddy"

[ - ] JustALover 0 points 1 monthApr 27, 2025 09:32:08 ago (+0/-0)

I'm perfectly fine with drones in my house, but that means my drones get to go into the house of zogbots and politicians and interrupt their child orgies.

[ - ] Sleazy 1 point 1 monthApr 27, 2025 17:37:27 ago (+1/-0)

I dont think it means what you think it means

[ - ] Consensus_Reality 0 points 1 monthApr 27, 2025 20:17:15 ago (+0/-0)

If you have the power to implement such a policy then I say go for it.

If you don't have the power then you are simply espousing ineffectual, feel-good nonsense.

Find your power....

[ - ] Consensus_Reality 0 points 1 monthApr 27, 2025 20:15:30 ago (+0/-0)

...feminist followers.

These followers are a symptom of weak White men. Nothing will change until White men accept that they are ultimately responsible for their own demise. Only then can courage and strength be found to implement solutions and remedy the situation in which we find ourselves.

[ - ] RMGoetbbels 2 points 1 monthApr 27, 2025 08:48:29 ago (+2/-0)

So we do own the airspace immediately above our homes. Free the guy who shot down that walmart drone!

[ - ] glooper 1 point 1 monthApr 27, 2025 13:58:38 ago (+1/-0)

in the states there is a FED rule. Something like 500 feet above your property is yours, but I'm not sure that is the exact distance. It's been a while since i looked it up.


Edit: Found this:
Interestingly, you control as much airspace as you can reasonably use (could probably argue 20-30 feet) but the airspace above that is not for public use until it becomes 'navigable airspace" which prior court law has noted as somewhere around 400-500 feet. Currently these rules are being debated due to the use of drone

[ - ] Sal_180 0 points 1 monthApr 28, 2025 17:06:29 ago (+0/-0)

People on this site were cheering on ICE and warrentless entry of the home 3 days ago. Thats how rights are eroded, dipshits happy when it's happening to someone else

[ - ] jfroybees 0 points 1 monthApr 27, 2025 16:13:31 ago (+0/-0)

As should be with any and all surveillance. Thermal imaging had to be tamed.