The parties to an offence Where two or more persons are involved in an offence, the parties to the offence may be principals (D1) or secondary parties (accessories) (D2). Each offence will have at least one principal, although it is not always possible or necessary to identify the principal(s).
A principal is one who carries out the substantive offence i.e. performs or causes the actus reus of the offence with the required mens rea. If two or more persons do so, they are joint principals.
A secondary party is one who aids, abets, counsels or procures (commonly referred to as assists or encourages) D1 to commit the substantive offence, without being a principal offender. However, a secondary party can be prosecuted and punished as if he were a principal offender: s8 Accessories and Abettors Act 1861.
There is no person named the Antichrist. That is a common misinterpretation. To be Antichrist is a state of mind if you look at the biblical mentions of it contextually.
Both Catholics and especially Protestant fundies push this hard though, and often hysterically in a way that makes the whole church look bad. Fundies constantly equate the Antichrist with the Beast of Revelation, and we end up with talk of stuff like 'head wounds' - which is a reference to the passage that the Beast was seemingly dead and then not. Mikhail Gorbachev, with that splotch on his head, thus became "THE Antichrist'.
Lol, ironically the ones who will survive beyond the ‘end times’ are the believers, those who are trying to help you to understand your perilous position :)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 3 points 1 monthMay 1, 2025 11:09:21 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer [op] 2 points 1 monthMay 1, 2025 15:25:33 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 1 monthMay 2, 2025 19:29:28 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer [op] 1 point 1 monthMay 3, 2025 07:00:17 ago (+1/-0)
The parties to an offence
Where two or more persons are involved in an offence, the parties to the offence may be principals (D1) or secondary parties (accessories) (D2). Each offence will have at least one principal, although it is not always possible or necessary to identify the principal(s).
A principal is one who carries out the substantive offence i.e. performs or causes the actus reus of the offence with the required mens rea. If two or more persons do so, they are joint principals.
A secondary party is one who aids, abets, counsels or procures (commonly referred to as assists or encourages) D1 to commit the substantive offence, without being a principal offender. However, a secondary party can be prosecuted and punished as if he were a principal offender: s8 Accessories and Abettors Act 1861.
[ + ] Loves2smootch
[ - ] Loves2smootch 3 points 1 monthMay 1, 2025 08:36:28 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer [op] 1 point 1 monthMay 1, 2025 08:44:06 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 1 monthMay 1, 2025 15:30:37 ago (+0/-0)
Both Catholics and especially Protestant fundies push this hard though, and often hysterically in a way that makes the whole church look bad. Fundies constantly equate the Antichrist with the Beast of Revelation, and we end up with talk of stuff like 'head wounds' - which is a reference to the passage that the Beast was seemingly dead and then not. Mikhail Gorbachev, with that splotch on his head, thus became "THE Antichrist'.
[ + ] BushChuck5002
[ - ] BushChuck5002 0 points 1 monthMay 2, 2025 08:07:03 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] BushChuck5002
[ - ] BushChuck5002 -1 points 1 monthMay 1, 2025 07:48:55 ago (+2/-3)
Fuck off, you're all a bunch of jews.
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer [op] 0 points 1 monthMay 1, 2025 07:59:16 ago (+2/-2)
Eye no, eye no.
[ + ] BushChuck5002
[ - ] BushChuck5002 0 points 1 monthMay 1, 2025 08:35:41 ago (+2/-2)
christcucks have been wailing on about the end times since the cult was founded.
Literally the same obsessive cultish jew crap that caused the fall of rome.
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer [op] 0 points 1 monthMay 1, 2025 08:43:14 ago (+2/-2)