Sign into an existing account

Out of Africa, putting aside any other issues with its legitimacy, does little more than imply non-blacks were evolved enough to get out of Africa.

Im happy to debate you on this issue RU. First of all youve perpetrated a fallacy by conflating a hypothetical african ancestral group of eurasians with modern sub saharan africans. Modern SS african blacks are not a static genetic population from which all other groups emanated and no one in the field is saying that . Indigenous to africa =/= denzel washington. A proposed OoA event is suggested to have taken place 50 to 120,000 years ago. That is a period when genetic diversity among homonins was much higher in africa (and everywhere else) than it is today . We know that the ancestors of West african/bantus mixed with a highly divergent archaic homonin 30kya resulting in ~10% admixture in modern SS africans. That is well after a hypothetical OoA of proto-eurasians.

The truth is we dont know where proto-eurasians were living after they diverged from the ancestors of modern SS Africans. It could have been in the middle east or india. But it misses the boat.

OoA is dead. Here is David Reich, the grand poobah of human evolution, saying the quiet part out loud.

A key period in human evolution wasn't in Africa – David Reich
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1SbyMBvJzkE

Homonins have been living in Eurasia for 2 million years. Many now believe that homo antecessor, a european homonin is the common ancestor of neanderthal, denisovan and EMH. So regardless of whether proto-eurasians came from africa 100,000 years ago, all africans of that time frame were partly the result of Back to Africa (BTA) migration, which we now now has occured multiple times within the last 50,000 years. And we know that the least BTA introgressed africans today, the Khoi-San and the Pygmys, are the most primitive with the lowest IQ. West African/bantu agriculturalists have much higher levels of eurasian ancestry— that is how they became agriculturalists

Africans and other tropical populations have been the beneficiaries of adaptations like hunting and fire making and agriculture that evolved outside of africa in cold climates. We know what happens when great apes evolve in the tropics: you get orangutans, gorillas, and chimps— fruit eaters that swing from trees. Its only cold climates that incentivized hunting (no fruit in winter). Only homonins lived in these environments. We know what happens when homonin like modern humans stay in the tropics for a long time — like SS Africans and Abos, they stagnate.

The new model is multiregional hypothesis. There are variations of this model. None of them arbitrarily focus on one potential migration in one particular time period, while ignoring other gene flows like BTA, which is the absurdity of OoA. We know many related species maintained reproductive compatibility across the globe for millions of years.

The Martian King, Spirit PanCam Sol 1359 - A carved bust photographed in Gusev Crater on Mars by NASA's Spirit Rover in 2008, shows a robed figure wearing a crown, that he could pass for a modern man turns Charles Darwin's Descent of Man pdf on its head, as well it refutes Adam and Eve and the notion men evolved from Ethiopian ape brutes. Human & Alien Life on Mars & Venus - The Evolution of Man.

The Irish beginnings of white civilization.

All of us came from apes, but just because one species of ape learned how to speak and mimic human behavior doesn't mean we should have passed the Civil Rights Act.

You know that's not true, retard.

Actually the truth is humans that we now know is the ancestors of Europe descended more from the Indus valley and other areas in the Middle East and went North and n**** went South and revred with another previous branch of humanoid that was a very lower intelligence thus bringing the n* bloodline down lower. Basically the ancestors of n** bred with nearmonkeys to make the current n*** stock.