The idea of a steady, stable climate? It’s a modern illusion.
In the 1800s, early weather records showed little change—so science assumed climate was constant. But the Little Ice Age tells a different story: cooling brought hardship, warming in the 1730s brought health and growth.
We ignored natural change for a century. Are we still doing it now?
The same people who claim that “The science is settled” also screech and yell that “science changes” when you point out that their predictions were wrong. I am beginning to think that climate alarmists are just clinically stupid people.
I wouldn't call them stupid. Blinders of greed, more like. The climate scam is around $1 trillion so far - where has that money gone? Nobody knows, but more than a few of these climate activists have raked in millions, with big (((companies))) and fronts getting billions.
And nobody will every say where a single dollar of that money went, let alone how it "improved" the climate.
[ + ] bossman131
[ - ] bossman131 [op] 0 points 8 hoursMay 14, 2025 15:58:02 ago (+0/-0)
In the 1800s, early weather records showed little change—so science assumed climate was constant. But the Little Ice Age tells a different story: cooling brought hardship, warming in the 1730s brought health and growth.
We ignored natural change for a century. Are we still doing it now?
[ + ] bossman131
[ - ] bossman131 [op] 0 points 8 hoursMay 14, 2025 16:00:48 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 7 hoursMay 14, 2025 16:32:53 ago (+0/-0)
And nobody will every say where a single dollar of that money went, let alone how it "improved" the climate.