Lincoln only freed the slaves in the south and he only did it to inspire slave rebellions at plantations that were largely being overseen by the women and children Confederate soldiers left there to fight the war. To put it another way, Lincoln wanted Southern women and children raped and murdered by niggers to demoralize the South. Fuck Lincoln.
Slavery was part of it. But there were larger issues that started to challenge the control of "The North" on the Southern states, as well as the new states, and territories (Kansas is one example) seeking admission to The United States.
In fact, there was an incident in Kansas that most consider to the be actual spark of the Civil War.
Im not american. We were always taught it was about england ordering americans to do shit and also press ganging americans (aka kidnap) into the royal navy. The whole slave thing was more about rich people wanting to stay rich.
Thing is tho slavery should have stayed. Its like horses, everyone wants horse racing banned but what use are horses now, and what else do we do with them?
Slaves got fed and housed and were prevented from hurting anyone but each other.... unlike the free niggers now who are an absolute violent menace.
Tl;dr cheap farming equipment is useful and can be employed in a constructive manner. Free niggers are of no use to anyone and cant be employed at all.
They did so well with the holocaust that, at this point, I don’t believe almost anything that I’ve been told was the cause of the civil war. Think about it. Did that shit even happen?
stupid limeys fled their country to be "free". Proceed to enslave people that had NO BUSINESS being on that land. Work to re-establish their oppressive ways. Some of them fall about listlessly, unable to cope without a central queen or king. They end up killing each other for a while, until those the union establishes a central government, which then committed the gravest, most reprehensible, action ever. They didn't return the slaves, they took people who had no education, were aggressive and angry, and just released them into society.
The civil war was a misguided effort by Northerners hell bent on keeping their deadbeat southern neighbors living in the country's figurative basement for the rest of time.
Taxation was part of it.. but overall it was The North's need to flex it's authority over The South on a variety of issues.
As more states, and territories joined The United States the North felt threatened if they would align with the South's denial of The North's authority over them.
The authority the North wanted over the South was the power to extract income through the agricultural tariff. Lincoln was clear when he ordered the invasion of South Carolina that all they had to do was submit to the tariff and he would recall the troops. He also said as much in his 1861 Inaugural Address.
I actually have a source that addresses this in a comprehensive way. "When in the Course of Human Events: Arguing the Case for Southern Secession" by Charles Adams. A review on Amazon, copied from Booklist by Mary Carroll reads:
In case anyone doubted Garry Wills' argument in A Necessary Evil that the peculiar myths and distortions surrounding the nature, formation, and meaning of the U.S. regularly stir movements committed to myth rather than reality, Adams, a historian of taxation, delivers a polemic that proves it. The Civil War, Adams argues, was not about slavery or the Union; it was about tariffs! The Southern states had a right to secede. Slavery would have ended at some point, but Lincoln did not particularly threaten it. It was, Adams maintains, the "dueling tariffs" of the Union and the Confederacy that caused the war. Within his states' rights argument, Adams maintains secession's legality should have been determined by the courts, and slaveholders should have been compensated for the property they lost through emancipation. Adams relies heavily on the European press; he asserts, but does not prove, that U.S. abolitionists were a fanatical lunatic fringe. The author clearly anticipates controversy; it should not be long in coming.
[italics and emphasis mine]
This book is nearly 300 pages, but a good part of that is references and sources. Overall it's an easy read. 10/10, strongly recommended.
Non slavery states were somewhat equal to slavery states and they didn't want to allow new states with slavery to enter the union allowing non slave states to pass legislation contrary to the interest of the south.
Slavery was a small facet of it, it had more to do with political power. The south was not industrialized, at all, like the north and it's only real value was farming. Essentially the north was looking to crush the south politically by using slavery as a weapon.
Oh? You don't want to vote for less taxes for railroad incursion on your land? Nice slavery ya got there, be a shame if something happened to it.
It seeks not to elevate or to support the slave, but to destroy his present condition without providing a better.
There is well supported conjecture that the reason for the war was to keep the US as a single entity. Lincoln knew the trouble Russia was having with the jews. (well documented) Most slaver ships were owned by jews; the trade was throughout the Americas, much in South America, primarily Brazil and the Caribbean. Most slaves in Brazil were owned by jews. Auctions were cancelled on jew holy days. Rothschild controlled most of Europe by 1850 (through economics). Many southern slave owners were jews. Rothschild's plan (conjecture, but supported) was to have the south secede, and through political/economic means, cede the south to France. The north would then be powerless, and again through political/economic means, control would be handed to Canada, therefore Britain. That would place Rothschild in control of the US, both economically and politically.
In the end, Rothschild did gain control over the whole shebang through the act in 1871. It simply required more time to attain the total control. That happened with the Titanic in 1912, followed by the fed etc in 1913. By 1972, the economy was debt based, and the jews had it all. Don't believe that? Look at the presence of aipac in DC. Basically, we're screwed.
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 4 points 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 14:14:22 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 5 points 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 14:30:01 ago (+5/-0)
Slavery was one aspect of this forced change dictated from "The North"
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 1 point 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 14:41:09 ago (+1/-0)
Check exactly that that is.
The information the jooish teachers aren't teaching is frighting.
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 2 points 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 14:46:59 ago (+2/-0)*
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mason%E2%80%93Dixon_line#Symbolism
_______________________________________________________
The Civil War between pro-slavery, and anti-slavery Americans actually started in "Bleeding Kansas" in 1856.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleeding_Kansas#Summer_of_1856
There is even a mural in the Kansas State Capitol building depicting it. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragic_Prelude
[ + ] drstrangergov
[ - ] drstrangergov 3 points 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 14:11:41 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 4 points 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 14:49:47 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] drstrangergov
[ - ] drstrangergov 0 points 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 20:53:24 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 0 points 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 21:31:28 ago (+0/-0)
https://youtu.be/-pZG7snE7tU?si=-5t_YdwpGctCjR8r
It's long, but well done.
[ + ] drstrangergov
[ - ] drstrangergov 0 points 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 21:52:03 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 2 points 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 14:33:37 ago (+2/-0)
In fact, there was an incident in Kansas that most consider to the be actual spark of the Civil War.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Brown_(abolitionist)#Move_to_Kansas
[ + ] i_scream_trucks
[ - ] i_scream_trucks 0 points 3 weeksMay 22, 2025 02:06:22 ago (+0/-0)
Thing is tho slavery should have stayed. Its like horses, everyone wants horse racing banned but what use are horses now, and what else do we do with them?
Slaves got fed and housed and were prevented from hurting anyone but each other.... unlike the free niggers now who are an absolute violent menace.
Tl;dr cheap farming equipment is useful and can be employed in a constructive manner. Free niggers are of no use to anyone and cant be employed at all.
[ + ] MrPancake
[ - ] MrPancake 0 points 3 weeksMay 22, 2025 09:12:23 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MasklessTheGreat
[ - ] MasklessTheGreat 1 point 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 19:07:40 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 1 point 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 16:57:25 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] RollinDaGrassTyson
[ - ] RollinDaGrassTyson 1 point 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 16:30:01 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 1 point 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 14:29:49 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 2 points 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 14:40:19 ago (+2/-0)
As more states, and territories joined The United States the North felt threatened if they would align with the South's denial of The North's authority over them.
[ + ] Lost_In_The_Thinking
[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 3 weeksMay 22, 2025 06:24:21 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ilikeskittles
[ - ] ilikeskittles 0 points 3 weeksMay 22, 2025 08:42:16 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Lost_In_The_Thinking
[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 3 weeksMay 22, 2025 06:29:10 ago (+0/-0)
[italics and emphasis mine]
This book is nearly 300 pages, but a good part of that is references and sources. Overall it's an easy read. 10/10, strongly recommended.
[ + ] i_scream_trucks
[ - ] i_scream_trucks 0 points 3 weeksMay 22, 2025 02:02:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] RMGoetbbels
[ - ] RMGoetbbels 0 points 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 18:38:51 ago (+0/-0)
The Declaration of Causes of Seceding States
Slavery was a small facet of it, it had more to do with political power. The south was not industrialized, at all, like the north and it's only real value was farming. Essentially the north was looking to crush the south politically by using slavery as a weapon.
Oh? You don't want to vote for less taxes for railroad incursion on your land? Nice slavery ya got there, be a shame if something happened to it.
It seeks not to elevate or to support the slave, but to destroy his present condition without providing a better.
[ + ] Seadevil110
[ - ] Seadevil110 0 points 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 17:25:27 ago (+0/-0)
Lincoln knew the trouble Russia was having with the jews. (well documented)
Most slaver ships were owned by jews; the trade was throughout the Americas, much in South America, primarily Brazil and the Caribbean. Most slaves in Brazil were owned by jews. Auctions were cancelled on jew holy days.
Rothschild controlled most of Europe by 1850 (through economics). Many southern slave owners were jews. Rothschild's plan (conjecture, but supported) was to have the south secede, and through political/economic means, cede the south to France. The north would then be powerless, and again through political/economic means, control would be handed to Canada, therefore Britain. That would place Rothschild in control of the US, both economically and politically.
In the end, Rothschild did gain control over the whole shebang through the act in 1871. It simply required more time to attain the total control. That happened with the Titanic in 1912, followed by the fed etc in 1913. By 1972, the economy was debt based, and the jews had it all. Don't believe that? Look at the presence of aipac in DC.
Basically, we're screwed.
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 0 points 3 weeksMay 21, 2025 14:53:11 ago (+0/-0)