This whole argument that you shouldn't care about what people doing their private life is the latest Jewish mindbender.
I damn well do care what people do in their private life and I judge their morals and their value to society by what they do in their public and private life. What they do in their private life shows more what kind of person they really are than what they do in their public life especially these days.
So yeah I care what he does in his private life and you should too.
I've thought about this frequently. The phrase "I don't care what they're doing behind closed doors" is often used by people who are telling you to "mind your own business".
Here's the thing: what is done behind closed doors inevitably spills out into the world. There's also an arbitrary line that people will draw where they "start caring" about what's happening behind said doors.
For example, people will defend homosexuality because "I don't care what they do in their bedroom". Well, next month, they're going to be doing what they do in their bedrooms in MASSIVE, DISRUPTIVE, DISGUSTING "PARADES".
I would also reply to that defense with "Well, what if they're cooking methamphetamine next door to your home? Do you care about that, even though it's being done out of your sight? The presence of a drug house means the presence of druggies. The presence of druggies means theft, violence, and property damage. So, where do you draw that line?"
It's hard to juggle this notion with the expectations of privacy we have. Any thoughts?
I'm reminded of the horde of leftist-libtards on Twatter, that were sooooo gung-ho to silence and ban conservatives, until Musk took over and did the same to them....then it was time to cue the violins, and listen to the cacophony of commies wailing'n'bitching about their Free Speech! What goes around will eventually come back around. Twas always so!
Jesusfreakos are exactly the same, as are the jews and islamaholics. All want to be lil control freaks running about mandating their BS on others. Like a slobbering army of Nannyites from The Nanny State, who ALWAYS know what is best for you, and someday you will damn well thank them profusely!
The phrase "a man's home is his castle" originates from English law and the principle established in Semayne's Case in 1604. This legal case, reported by Sir Edward Coke, addressed the right to privacy within one's home, stating that a man's house is as much a refuge for him as a castle is for its occupants. The phrase essentially asserts the right to privacy, security, and the freedom from unwarranted intrusion within one's home. While the Castle Doctrine is oft parroted by conservatives, the above is the enemy of those xtian turds that have infested the conservative movement, as it precludes their reaching into the private lives of heathens, pagans, infidels, buddhists, and all those non-believers they are so desperate to oppress.
The whole argument that Group A has any right or privilege to dictate what Group B can or cannot do in their own home is the longstanding demand of the three abrahamic-based 'religions', totalitarian turds, the Nannyites of The Nanny State, and similar control freaks. This has been (and one hopes always will be) their eternally unrealized wetdream.
People misunderstand what makes a good country. People with strict morals have better countries because moral behavior affects economic and reproductive outcomes, and I dont have to explain why they are relevant to a country’s success. Up-tight people with high standards built better civilizations.
Liberalizing those behavioral standards leads to ruin. Progressives think morals are superstitious religious beliefs and fail to recognize the eugenic effects of racial and sexual policies.
Current society is too jewish and corrupted by foreigners to be salvaged. So what people do in private is less relevant than working to crash the whole dystopia. Sure, take some time out to exterminate public faggots and degenerates. But private behaviors won't become a big deal until after the reset.
Then the nature and character of your neighbors in your hamlet and small towns will be critical to the wellbeing of your family, friends, and everyone. Large cities and their (((parasite class))) will thankfully at that point be a horror from the past.
After having a fair amount of experience with our civilization, I believe the jews when they cite (bragg about) all the influence they've had to 'progress' us to this point.
[ + ] BloodyComet
[ - ] BloodyComet 2 points 2 weeksMay 31, 2025 14:23:03 ago (+2/-0)
Here's the thing: what is done behind closed doors inevitably spills out into the world. There's also an arbitrary line that people will draw where they "start caring" about what's happening behind said doors.
For example, people will defend homosexuality because "I don't care what they do in their bedroom". Well, next month, they're going to be doing what they do in their bedrooms in MASSIVE, DISRUPTIVE, DISGUSTING "PARADES".
I would also reply to that defense with "Well, what if they're cooking methamphetamine next door to your home? Do you care about that, even though it's being done out of your sight? The presence of a drug house means the presence of druggies. The presence of druggies means theft, violence, and property damage. So, where do you draw that line?"
It's hard to juggle this notion with the expectations of privacy we have. Any thoughts?
[ + ] PuddinTame
[ - ] PuddinTame 0 points 2 weeksMay 31, 2025 18:09:28 ago (+0/-0)
Jesusfreakos are exactly the same, as are the jews and islamaholics. All want to be lil control freaks running about mandating their BS on others. Like a slobbering army of Nannyites from The Nanny State, who ALWAYS know what is best for you, and someday you will damn well thank them profusely!
The phrase "a man's home is his castle" originates from English law and the principle established in Semayne's Case in 1604. This legal case, reported by Sir Edward Coke, addressed the right to privacy within one's home, stating that a man's house is as much a refuge for him as a castle is for its occupants. The phrase essentially asserts the right to privacy, security, and the freedom from unwarranted intrusion within one's home. While the Castle Doctrine is oft parroted by conservatives, the above is the enemy of those xtian turds that have infested the conservative movement, as it precludes their reaching into the private lives of heathens, pagans, infidels, buddhists, and all those non-believers they are so desperate to oppress.
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama 1 point 2 weeksMay 31, 2025 15:16:48 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PuddinTame
[ - ] PuddinTame 0 points 2 weeksMay 31, 2025 18:17:01 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2 weeksMay 31, 2025 18:10:42 ago (+0/-0)
Liberalizing those behavioral standards leads to ruin. Progressives think morals are superstitious religious beliefs and fail to recognize the eugenic effects of racial and sexual policies.
[ + ] Trope
[ - ] Trope 0 points 2 weeksMay 31, 2025 16:44:15 ago (+0/-0)
“You shouldn’t care about what people do in their private life.”
“No. Fuck you.”
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 2 weeksMay 31, 2025 13:09:37 ago (+0/-0)
Then the nature and character of your neighbors in your hamlet and small towns will be critical to the wellbeing of your family, friends, and everyone. Large cities and their (((parasite class))) will thankfully at that point be a horror from the past.
After having a fair amount of experience with our civilization, I believe the jews when they cite (bragg about) all the influence they've had to 'progress' us to this point.
jew: "My mocking compliments to the hosts."