Sign into an existing account

I understand very well. Uranium itself doesn't "explode" or "melt down" simply because it decays quickly. If uranium decayed extremely quickly (unnaturally so), it could produce more heat, possibly leading to overheating if confined (but not an explosion). Meltdowns (e.g., Fukushima) are caused by decay heat from fission products (not uranium itself). Explosions in reactors (e.g., Chernobyl) are from steam/hydrogen buildup or prompt criticality—not uranium decay.

So, what I hear out of you is that you didn't pass high school physics. Noted.

At this moment, uranium pellets coated in ceramics and graphite can maintain heat and, even with meltdown, are contained and safe. The outer casing is designed to block the dangerous radiation. This has been in existence for at least 20+ years. There is no reason these small power plants powered with these pellets can't be all over the place.

I invite you to go to Hiroshima and look at Ground Zero. There is a building there... still standing, which means we have conventional weapons that are stronger. But, even worse, there is no directional wave form the epicenter, indicating Hiroshima was firebombed along with the 375 other locations in Japan we firebombed in the same year.

Reaching super criticality is purportedly achieved by firing neutron bullets at the center of plutonium or enriched uranium. But, we can fire at gold for back scattering experiments and this apparatus is easily obtainable by anyone who potentially wants a nuclear weapon.

Just like we STILL can't go back to the moon, with more technology and knowledge, state actors are STILL not capable of building nuclear weapons on their own.

Plus, you have to trust a bunch of jews like oppenheimer were truthful and credible for the entire storyline to be believable.

Let's assume a small group of jews was lying about their invention. Just for a moment. Now, ask yourself, in this moment, do we believe they were the only group of people with the technology and were smart enough to build two bombs to drop on Japan and somehow no one has ever figured it out since?

Add to that the fakery in the nuclear test videos. The Chinese ones are the most telling as they have guys on horses with gas masks riding towards the explosions with fire trucks and fire hoses. Some nuclear test videos are obvious fakery.

And, do you know who was in charge of curating that footage for the Americans? The same person who curated the JFK assassination videos. I'd be curious of his involvement in the moon landing videos, as well.

(tl;dr Neutron radiography equipment of today is far superior than what Oppenheimer had and anyone with a brain could fire it at a plutonium core. Why haven't they? Are you telling me North Korea hasn't tried this?)