×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
7
21 comments block


[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 6 points 1 dayJun 13, 2025 20:53:22 ago (+6/-0)

Why? What purpose does it serve? Just for fun? Who would want to intentionally crash a plane full of Indians?

[ - ] TankTinker [op] 0 points 1 dayJun 13, 2025 21:25:38 ago (+0/-0)*

Mossad thence Jews and Israel have had a long history of committing outrage on the Indian sub continent, not limited to the 2008 Mumbai Terror Attack that killed 160, whereas the Indians immediately blamed Pakistan for that attack and a follow up attack at the Nariman House, a Jewish outreach center also known as the Mumbai Chabad House .. there were Israelis everywhere.

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 1 point 1 dayJun 13, 2025 23:47:21 ago (+1/-0)

Well a terror attack would make sense for a false flag. Indian plane crash? That's not something that probably surprises anyone here. It's more plausible that the pilot was trying to take a shit in the cockpit during takeoff or sexually assaulting one of the stewardesses. I'm honestly surprised more crashes don't happen.

[ - ] lord_nougat 2 points 1 dayJun 13, 2025 20:51:24 ago (+2/-0)

Maybe the plane was possessed by the devil.

[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 1 point 1 dayJun 13, 2025 22:18:11 ago (+1/-0)

That was my first thought as well my lord.

[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 1 dayJun 14, 2025 02:52:06 ago (+0/-0)

There was an air india crash in recent times.
Landing in high altitude too. The video from a passenger phone was shown here.
Anyway.

The cause of the crash was blamed on the fairly new female pilot in charge.

But actually, 100%, the old make, jaded, shitskin pilot attending suicided taking every one else with him

He took orders, said he did rhem but in fact he deliberately feathered the props (turbo prop plane, >100 passengers) so that the pilot had no thrust no matter how much throttle she gave the engines.

The irony was, just as before the plane stalled and heeled over and crashed. She gave control back to the very man deliberately crashed the plane.

Of course that was kept secret.

[ - ] lord_nougat 1 point 1 dayJun 14, 2025 02:58:28 ago (+1/-0)

It is all so excruciatingly pajeety.

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 1 dayJun 13, 2025 20:46:49 ago (+2/-0)

High jacking doesn't cause the RAT to deploy.

[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 0 points 1 dayJun 13, 2025 22:16:39 ago (+0/-0)

Did the RAT deploy? I haven't read the article, only looked at the video on my phone so I can't see it all that well. My first impression looking at it was loss of power and if the RAT deployed then that's the cause, plain and simple. It was on it's climb out and just settled back to the ground and crashed, no nose dive. Clearly it didn't have power to finish it's climb and crashed. Now why it would have a catastrophic power failure on climb out would be my question. But you grabbed my attention when you mentioned the RAT.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1 dayJun 13, 2025 22:51:29 ago (+0/-0)

[ - ] uvulectomy 1 point 1 dayJun 13, 2025 22:26:01 ago (+1/-0)

SCHIZO TAKE FROM A SELF-ADMITTED PEDOPHILE AND FAGGOT. DRINK BLEACH, OP.

Everything points to dumb jeets doing dumb jeet things.

[ - ] o0shad0o 1 point 1 dayJun 13, 2025 22:18:19 ago (+1/-0)

Analysis I saw said pilot error, that the most likely explanation is the copilot retracted the flaps instead of the landing gear, simultaneously creating insufficient lift and excess drag. Engines appeared to be operating properly while the landing gear was never raised, and the point where they would normally raise the gear is when the aircraft stopped gaining altitude.

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 dayJun 13, 2025 23:00:05 ago (+1/-0)

That is not the most likely cause. The RAT deployed. The gear was down because they lost hydronic power, likely due to duel engine failure. The RAT cannot provide the hydrolic power to pull the gear up.

Engines appeared to be operating properly

Show me the "appearance" of engines operating properly on that aircraft.

[ - ] o0shad0o 0 points 19 hoursJun 14, 2025 22:03:30 ago (+0/-0)

https://x.com/IvensDad/status/1933157056808194423 no sign of RAT I can see but IDK where it's mounted on the 787. Also flaps visually incorrect.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 19 hoursJun 14, 2025 22:15:40 ago (+0/-0)

He's wrong. There is no flaps 1 position. There is a flaps 5 for normal takeoffs or flaps 15 for short field takeoffs. If the aircraft is not in either of these two positions, there would have been an audible and visual alarm prior to takeoff.

The aircraft slowly goes nose high because they are losing power and unable to stay airborne. The pilot is pulling back on the yoke to minimize the decent rate and he eventually stalls the aircraft.

The landing gear is extended because the RAT will not supply enough hydrolic force to lift the gear.

Low engine noise? I hadn't heard it described that way, but would be a sign of a loss of engine power. Engine noise on n9rmal takeoff is as loud as the engines get.

And, no mention of the RAT. The RAT isn't something you are going to see from any of the angles that they have, but you can clearly hear it.

Here is Juan Brown from Blancolirio to explain it to you.

https://youtu.be/mSo3DZP-FJ4

[ - ] MartinTimothy 0 points 1 dayJun 13, 2025 22:51:16 ago (+0/-0)*

"Copilot" nuthin', it has been fashionable for quite some time to blame copilots for all manner of airliner disasters, read on ..

The young lady co pilot was blamed for the Feb. 29, 2009 Colgan Flt 3407 crash, as well co pilots world wide are getting the blame for a host of other airline disasters..

EgyptAir Flight 990 Oct. 31, 1999.
Branson's Spaceship 2, Oct. 31, 2014.
Germanwings Flight 9525 Mar. 24, 2015.

Private Cessna 172, Mar. 21, 2016, the airplane was being flown by a highly experienced and trained Qantas co pilot. Co-pilot Alexander Rovensky got the blame for the Christmas Day 2016, crash of Tu-154 under charter to the Russian Military. Daily Mail Online.

The Colgan Air Flight 3407 crash killed 50, including the co chair of the steering committee for families who died on 9/11. Wiki. My gut feeling is they are all coverups, that the CP's are convenient whipping boys, patsies if you like.

The Richard Branson and Egypt Air disasters occurred on October 31 in their respective yrs, which is allegedly a time for Satanic human sacrifice, the March 24 timing of the Germanwings crash and the March 21 timing of the alleged Paul White Cessna suicide gives rise to more suspicion.

[ - ] Kalimero 0 points 1 dayJun 14, 2025 09:00:31 ago (+0/-0)

Another Mossad terror attack on India (Mumbai). This time on Ahmedabad.

[ - ] Doglegwarrior 0 points 1 dayJun 13, 2025 22:20:37 ago (+0/-0)

For sure everything on 9/11 was remote controlled no way retarded islamist that the official story said did it could have done it.

Take the 4 smartest goats with flying experience. But them in a massive airliner in a foreign country with 6 months of training and they have to hit 4 massive important targets...

Zero fucking zero chance of hitting shit

[ - ] Drstrangestgov 0 points 1 dayJun 13, 2025 21:31:49 ago (+0/-0)

If the technology is there why wouldn't they?

[ - ] Sector2 0 points 1 dayJun 13, 2025 21:10:22 ago (+0/-0)

Indications of operator error so far. Technical problems wouldn't normally force the pilot to rotate too soon. You can go airborne, but you need airspeed to stay there. No flaps and gear down just makes it worse.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1 dayJun 13, 2025 23:01:20 ago (+0/-0)

The RAT deployed. That's not operator error. That's a major power malfunction. Possibly duel engine failure.