I agree it's clearly AI, but apart from the claim that a photo from 1929 would be in such immaculate condition, what's the giveaway? Instinctively/intuitively I could see it was AI the moment I opened it, but I can't pinpoint exactly why. Definitely something with the shadows and skin sheen, but more than that I can't really say.
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 4 points 1 dayJun 14, 2025 08:03:48 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 1 dayJun 14, 2025 08:16:33 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 2 points 1 dayJun 14, 2025 08:19:44 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] ilikeskittles
[ - ] ilikeskittles 1 point 1 dayJun 14, 2025 08:24:34 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] mahavishnunj
[ - ] mahavishnunj 1 point 1 dayJun 14, 2025 08:28:00 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 1 point 1 dayJun 14, 2025 11:29:11 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PORTforceOne
[ - ] PORTforceOne 4 points 1 dayJun 14, 2025 11:42:02 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] InYourFaceNancyGrace
[ - ] InYourFaceNancyGrace 0 points 1 dayJun 14, 2025 12:28:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 0 points 1 dayJun 14, 2025 12:53:32 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 2 points 1 dayJun 14, 2025 12:49:39 ago (+2/-0)
Second thought: "Looks like AI"
Third thought: "I hate AI. I can no longer just automatically trust that a photo is real."
clicks link in top comment
My AI-dar appears to be pretty good.
[ + ] LiberalsAreMental
[ - ] LiberalsAreMental 0 points 1 dayJun 14, 2025 13:06:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 0 points 1 dayJun 14, 2025 16:25:31 ago (+0/-0)