Which itself is a stridently unserious response. It isn't even necessary really to explain why it is unserious.
But then you're definitely not a serious person. Pretty obvious you're on the internet to parade knowledge and make yourself feel better about yourself by 'dissing' the other person - along with the usual social media and screens addiction. This probably adequately describes most posters here though.
What is deeply unserious is your inability to even discuss my program with any moderation. You lack any professional qualifications in psychiatry yet you call me schizophrenic. You don't discuss any of the ideas, data, or figures undergirding my program. You just dismiss it with insults.
Really, is all you can do insult? This sorta stuff just demeans you. You'd make yourself look better by just ignoring me. I can at least somewhat respect a poster like Sector who did that.
We get all manner of assessments of me here besides. Fed, too dangerous to interact with, accused of setting the LA fires - even you've said I'm "remarkably well read".
"Unserious" just isn't really the right word to describe any of this. Maybe I'm even unsure what is. But that isn't it.
I don’t need to be a professional shrink to know you have a psychotic disorder. You have hallucinations and delusions. Im not trying to insult. But what am I supposed to say? You have probably already been diagnosed by someone probably while committed.
I think you are remarkably well read. Better than me on many issues. That doesn’t mean you are right. You dismiss any criticism you are given as “people who are unserious”. Thats a cop out. Its an ad hominem.
You should have created a post that encouraged people to read The Siege without insulting them. It was a hostile post and you got negative reactions— are you surprised? Dont you want to stimulate a discussion? Because this was not the way to do it.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2 daysJun 14, 2025 13:31:21 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 1 dayJun 14, 2025 17:40:22 ago (+0/-0)
But then you're definitely not a serious person. Pretty obvious you're on the internet to parade knowledge and make yourself feel better about yourself by 'dissing' the other person - along with the usual social media and screens addiction. This probably adequately describes most posters here though.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 1 dayJun 14, 2025 20:05:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 1 dayJun 14, 2025 20:18:02 ago (+0/-0)
Really, is all you can do insult? This sorta stuff just demeans you. You'd make yourself look better by just ignoring me. I can at least somewhat respect a poster like Sector who did that.
We get all manner of assessments of me here besides. Fed, too dangerous to interact with, accused of setting the LA fires - even you've said I'm "remarkably well read".
"Unserious" just isn't really the right word to describe any of this. Maybe I'm even unsure what is. But that isn't it.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 1 dayJun 14, 2025 20:26:08 ago (+0/-0)
I think you are remarkably well read. Better than me on many issues. That doesn’t mean you are right. You dismiss any criticism you are given as “people who are unserious”. Thats a cop out. Its an ad hominem.
You should have created a post that encouraged people to read The Siege without insulting them. It was a hostile post and you got negative reactions— are you surprised? Dont you want to stimulate a discussion? Because this was not the way to do it.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 2 daysJun 14, 2025 13:38:01 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] beece
[ - ] beece 1 point 2 daysJun 14, 2025 13:31:26 ago (+1/-0)*
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 2 daysJun 14, 2025 13:34:24 ago (+0/-0)
https://files.catbox.moe/17gxzm.mp4
https://files.catbox.moe/ck86kr.mp4
https://odysee.com/@TheHourofDecision:8/SIEGE---European-Renaissance---by-NS-Revolutionary-James-Mason:f
https://files.catbox.moe/m2pgwi.mp4