I broke my phone. And I liked it.
I hope those jeets at apple don't mind it.
It felt so wrong, it felt so right.
At the Iphone store; I'm the only racist in sight.
Flow (inception towards death) generates form (life). Living implies increase (hot); dying implies decrease (cold)...cold flow breathing (spirit) life into hot form implies spirit cooking.
Aka at (matter) his father's (motion) table (momentum). Motion implies the male aspect of nature; momentum its female balance, and matter its transformation of choice within.
> exile has no intrinsic connection with the jewish people
Being implies intrinsic separation from one another. A jew suggests extrinsic connections to tempt gentiles together, from within which gentiles desperately try to banish jews.
Example...gentiles try to banish each jew from their nations. What they ignore...a jew suggests nationalism to tempt gentiles into holding an artificial state together within a nature that separates each state from one another. This mass ignorance among gentiles permits each jew to be international aka "internal" to each artificial nation.
> the purpose is to reveal
Purpose aka position (pose) put forwards (pur/per) implies motion revealing matter aka substance generating essence. The natural order implies revelation to those within...who didn't choose to ignore it for whatever a jew tells them about it.
> how a jew and G-d are one thing
a) All is one in energy. Each partial within whole is part of whole. All for one and one for all. There can be only one. Each thing within everything implies one thing.
b) The name of G-d cannot be pronounced because pronunciation implies by words (partials) shaped within sound (whole). A partial cannot pronounce whole without ignoring that whole continues to separate partials by setting each one apart from one another. Labeling that which separates ignores its motion.
> the quicker we reveal the sooner we return
Motion implies revelation of matter, hence the quicker matter reveals, the sooner matter returns to motion.
Shariah/shari'ah (the revealed law) from shar (revelation), hence allah (law of all)...most Christians and Muslims ignore this. A jew shapes these words to distract gentiles from natural law.
> my only choice
Each ones free will of choice cannot be taken into possession (my) without contradicting it being free.
> They can
They haven't yet. Your fear towards what they could, provides the power for what they can.
Nature implies original cause for each effect within...artificial implies effects affecting each other, while ignoring natural cause.
There cannot be a lack of origin...only each beings lack of self discernment about originating as effect within cause.
> ouroboros
Aka a snake eating its own tail...eating its own tail represents circular logic within self turning into conflicts of reason against others aka mutual self destruction. The snake represents the forked tongue of ignoring natural (sound) for artificial (words).
a) I am aka je suis (jesus)...a taking possession over self, while ignoring the natural procession (inception towards death) of potential (life).
b) That aka a neuter (neither female; nor male) of se (male) and seo (female) aka suggested the-ism (the/this/that) neutering the separation of all perceivable (male) into each ones perception (female).
c) Taking possession over self (proclaiming) as "me; myself or I" labels every other one as a YOU (phonetic jew), hence ones choice selecting a chosen one...
>In other words, he is saying, "I am God!"
God implies sound/sanus (entire; whole; all)...words are shaped within sound to tempt those who hold onto DEFINITIONS to become DEAF PHONETICIANS aka deaf to phonics (sound).
Example...suggested words like "insane person" tempt one to ignore being in sanus (within sound) and per sonos (by sound), hence a by product within sound aka a mind structured within aka an in-stru-ment...
Masonic aka MAG (to knead, fashion, fit) SONIC (sound)...a freemason utilizes "free" will of choice to shape (ma) sound (son) into words aka spell-craft. A word is shaped by what? Letters aka ones consent LETTING another shape LETTERS into words aka word/verb/were - "to speak"
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/verb
> the name of God has been lost.
Been lost implies being (life) within loss (inception towards death) aka a separation of temporary growth within ongoing loss. This internal separation prevents matter (life) through momentum (inception towards death) from motion aka "unmoved mover"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmoved_mover
While within motion...one cannot give motion a name without ignoring that motion moves. Denying motion represents the foundation for idolatry (holding onto ideals) and nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing).
Motion isn't a name, but an implication of MO (mote) TION (action) aka of a partial reaction (life) within an enacting whole (inception towards death) aka of each anointed one (christ) divided/divined within holy/whole of all (god).
Can't help himself using an alleged genocide as the foundation of being a jew.
> jewish nazis
a) Aka ashke-nazis, but acknowledging that would dissolve the foundation for the alleged genocide.
b) Aka nazirite aka talmudic nazir...yet another alleged foundation of judaism.
c) Sidenote...remember Karl Heinz Schneider from that Captain Tsubasa manga? Well, that character is based on Karl Heinz Schneider aka Reuel Abraham aka the first nazi who converted to judaism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuel_Abraham
What's creepy is how easy gentiles allow themselves to be fooled with words like "doppelgänger" and "instagram" to distract from Iraqis killing Algerians within Germany...
a) Because hostilities feel alike to the one hosting. Both attacks are based on what one permitted into self, hence assault by invite.
b) Panic implies fear of suggested outcome, which is based on ones ignorance of perceivable origin.
> How tf do you deal with them
a) Suggested deal tempts ones consent into a "contract"...what's the opposite of contraction? Try that.
b) Perceivable deal/dæl - "part of a whole"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/deal implies being a part (perception) of a whole (perceivable), which one ignores when giving consent to a suggestion.
a) ISM implies the artificial, each being implies the center (choice) of nature (balance). It's each being giving consent to a suggested -ism by free will of choice, which imbalances oneself by doing so.
b) Being within nature implies want within need aka essential being, wielding the free will of choice to ignore necessity of nature (perceivable) for each others extravagant artifices (suggested).
Consent given to suggested moralism prevents uniqueness. Unique implies apart from one another, not consenting to one another within a collective moral framework.
Same shit with activism...action (active) generates reaction (reactive) by internal separation. If one reacts to another ones suggested active-ism, then one ignores to reactivate self when joining others, hence mutually draining each others passive stance.
> focus
Focusing narrows sight. Nature (all perceivable) offers each being (ones perception) a widespread sight. Others broadcast suggestions to tempt ones sight to narrow itself by focusing.
Slave chooses (consent) master (suggestion). One cannot master a slave without submission being given willingly.
> Salvation or no salvation is the choice
a) Salvation or no salvation imply suggested SELECTIONS for ones free will of choice...choosing either puts both against each other within a conflict of reason (salvation vs damnation).
b) NO implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) which tempts one to de-nial perceivable for suggested.
c) Salvation implies salva/salvus/sol (whole) + ation (action) aka whole action (inception towards death) for each partial reaction (life) within.
> We are all slaves.
Nature sets each one apart from one another aka singularity. Few suggest pluralism (we) to tempt each singular (one) to join together, hence establishing a commonwealth of many under the sovereignty of few aka slaves (we) under master (chosen one).
> Prisoners have no choice
a) Only within dominance (balance) can one be free (choice), hence free-dom aka free (life) during dominance (inception towards death).
b) Imprisonment and confinement implies ment/mentis (mind). If one ignores perceivable for suggested, then one permits others to exploit darkness (ignorance) to refract light (discernment) within a mental prism/prison... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM
He describes dialectic as two sides (or more) pushing a center...that's a deception. Ones choice represents center of balance, and choosing to hold onto any side brings imbalance to ones choice.
Neither did the Wallenberg family fell down, nor was anything taken over from them. Articles like these are written to distract gentiles from the family motto "Esse, non Videri"...
Wanting implies from another while one ignores need. It's therefore choosing want (fiction) over need (reality), which makes one a slave and another ones master.
> They actually don't want you to have any leisure time.
Leisure implies license...ones "free" will of choice doesn't require license. Few suggest many leisure as "freedom from necessary occupations", which tempts each ones to ignore being free (life) within dom (inception towards death); hence each ones necessity to resist wanted temptations.
There's no freedom from anything, only free within dominance of everything.
> different than slavery
Few shape suggestions...if many consent; then the suggested shackle binds a consenting slave to a suggesting master. Without consent...a master cannot bind a slave, because of each ones FREE will of choice.
> The fact that a circle exists proves the concept of eternity and infinity.
a) Infinity + eternity aka finite within ether.
b) Fact implies you holding onto a fictitious state, while ignoring natural motion. It's this choice to hold onto a state, which tricks one to think circumstantial, hence from within circular logic.
c) The shape of a circle one sees implies the ongoing separation of all perceivable and each temporary ones sight within. You are being tricked to use "fact" + "prove" + "concept" to hold onto a shape (circular); while ignoring the foundation for shaping aka motion (linear).
> You see, if there was no such thing as...
One cannot see NO (nothing). One thing (partial perception) within everything (perceivable whole) can be tricked with suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) to de-nial perceivable reality for suggested fiction by holding onto what nature moves.
> if there was no such thing as eternity and infinity...
...then ones denial of being finite (life) within ether (inception towards death) would permits other ones (chosen ones) to suggest the words "eternity" and "infinity" to describe whatever one denies at will. If one denies perceivable, then one agrees with suggested...hence natural balance for each beings free will of choice.
> as your circle neared completion
YOUR aka taking possession over yourself, while ignoring that nature (action) separates potential (reactions) from one another. Reaction implies center (life) of linear action (inception towards death).
The circle of life; wheel of fortune; leap of faith; band of hope till we find our place on the path unwinding represents a suggested distraction from the lion (lying) king (of judah)... https://genius.com/Elton-john-circle-of-life-lyrics
> you would be closing the distance between where you started and where you currently are by half forever
a) Distance implies each ones divided (dis) stance within all.
b) All opens (inception) and closes (death) each one (life), hence each being living (temporary growth) within process of dying (ongoing loss).
c) Measuring ones divided stance as half tempts one to ignore being within all current aka alone...all(in)one aka all for one and one for all aka energy (internal/inherent power).
Current implies flowing; being implies formed (life) during flow (inception towards death). When you write "currently"; then you suggest "formerly"...as if both wouldn't exist simultaneously.
A jew suggests currently and obviously "currency" to distract gentiles from discerning self to formed within flow.
d) Forever implies ever forwards (inception towards death generating life) aka always (way of all for each one within).
> If you try to connect the beginning point to the end point...
...then you ignore that nature separates them before one can try to artificially connect them aka ouroboros eating its own tail.
Velocity (inception towards death) implies linear; resistance (life) can be tempted to shape circular logic by those who utilize compass and square to shape idols/ideals for one to hold onto.
Consenting to a temptation (want) ignores resisting (need)...it's ones free will of choice.
> provable by calculating π to the last digit
The one (life) calculating cannot last (inception towards death)...a humble pie (π) to swallow.
> you could never complete the circle
Never aka "nothing everything"... a contradiction in terms. That's the logical circle within your mind, which you think is complete, but depletes your resistance by holding it together. If you choose to let go of "nothing", then you'll see the linear progression of "everything".
Drawing circles on the ground to entrap demons in witchcraft...that's circular logic trapping one from discerning self as dai (division) within mon (provision). That's also why a jew runs the dai-mon (diamond) trade...because circular logic makes a gentile a trader/traitor to linear thinking...
Nature implies same; being implies difference...logic implies likeness among beings, which permits few to control (roll together) many. Ones consent to suggested THE-ism establishes likeness.
> to say the exact opposite.
Nature generates opposites (balance) through separation (choice); saying artificial words puts consent and suggestion together, hence ignoring separation (choice) by "turning" opposites against each other (imbalance).
> proves vs disproves
Aka circular logic within oneself turning into a conflict of reason against one another, while ignoring the linear progression of nature moving (inception towards death) matter (life) into shape.
Natural current cannot be shut down...ones consent to an artificial currency permits other ones to flip an on/off switch at will.
> 4chan
Aka FOR CHANNELING...
> Why?
Shutting supply of currency down increases demand.
> Was it hacked by users who wanted to expose the jews running it?
To hack implies setting apart...world wide web implies a uniting together. Nature sets apart each being from one another...a jew suggests the world wide web to unite consenting gentiles together, while tempting them to get afraid of being "hacked" by others. That represents a wolf scaring the flock of sheep together to prevent single sheep to escape.
As for exposing a jew...to whom? To ignorant gentiles being exploited for their ignorance by a jew? A jew represents the natural response to gentile ignorance of nature...as long as gentiles continue to ignore nature, so long does each jew continue to utilize artificial temptations to destroy and exploit gentiles.
> Was it a legitimate free speech site that was exposing the jews elsewhere and was shut down by them?
a) Only each ones free will of choice is free to speak...speaking implies utilizing the suggested spell-craft (words) by others, which tempts one to bind ones choice to a chosen ones suggestion.
b) The shield of antisemitism requires a jew to switch alleged persecution by gentiles on and off. The issue isn't a jew, but gentile ignorance exploited by a jew.
> It seems like those are the only options.
Option implies "to choose" aka ones free will of choice...not the suggested options others are suggesting one to choose.
> Unless you have something outside the circle...?
That which moves outside the circle one cannot "have" aka take possession of...it's taking possession aka consenting to suggested information, which establishes circular logic within self, while ignoring perceivable inspiration outside.
One cannot hold onto inspiration, only draw from it, to shape within it, while it moves through one.
How about this...PSYCHO implies the animating power of nature; LOGICAL implies ones ignorance thereof while thinking about artifice; OPERATION implies another ones artificial suggestion tempting one into logical thinking.
It's a psy-op, because the one using circular logic cannot see outside the circle, hence confining self mentally.
From your perspective...can you think outside of true vs false logic or do you think you only have these two sides to choose from? Could there be something else outside of true or false information suggested to you?
ImplicationOverReason 4 points 8 hours ago
I broke my phone. And I liked it.
I hope those jeets at apple don't mind it.
It felt so wrong, it felt so right.
At the Iphone store; I'm the only racist in sight.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6813adca359a5
ImplicationOverReason 3 points 17 hours ago
Russell Warren Howe: "How does it feel, in the light of all that's going on, to be the father of terrorism in the Middle East?"
Menachem Begin: "In the Middle East?" he bellowed, in his thick, cartoon accent. "In all the world!"
- Russell Warren Howe interview with Menachem Begin, January 1974
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=681326abc36cb
ImplicationOverReason -1 points 1 day ago
> spirit cooking
Flow (inception towards death) generates form (life). Living implies increase (hot); dying implies decrease (cold)...cold flow breathing (spirit) life into hot form implies spirit cooking.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=68127b0c753e7
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 1 day ago
Moloch/molekh/melekh - "king", hence sacrificing others to the jewish king/kind/kin...
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=68123e034fd16
ImplicationOverReason -1 points 1 day ago*
> Holy Temple
Aka temporal within whole.
> At his father's table
Aka at (matter) his father's (motion) table (momentum). Motion implies the male aspect of nature; momentum its female balance, and matter its transformation of choice within.
> exile has no intrinsic connection with the jewish people
Being implies intrinsic separation from one another. A jew suggests extrinsic connections to tempt gentiles together, from within which gentiles desperately try to banish jews.
Example...gentiles try to banish each jew from their nations. What they ignore...a jew suggests nationalism to tempt gentiles into holding an artificial state together within a nature that separates each state from one another. This mass ignorance among gentiles permits each jew to be international aka "internal" to each artificial nation.
> the purpose is to reveal
Purpose aka position (pose) put forwards (pur/per) implies motion revealing matter aka substance generating essence. The natural order implies revelation to those within...who didn't choose to ignore it for whatever a jew tells them about it.
> how a jew and G-d are one thing
a) All is one in energy. Each partial within whole is part of whole. All for one and one for all. There can be only one. Each thing within everything implies one thing.
b) The name of G-d cannot be pronounced because pronunciation implies by words (partials) shaped within sound (whole). A partial cannot pronounce whole without ignoring that whole continues to separate partials by setting each one apart from one another. Labeling that which separates ignores its motion.
> the quicker we reveal the sooner we return
Motion implies revelation of matter, hence the quicker matter reveals, the sooner matter returns to motion.
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=68123e034fd16
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 1 day ago
>shariah
Shariah/shari'ah (the revealed law) from shar (revelation), hence allah (law of all)...most Christians and Muslims ignore this. A jew shapes these words to distract gentiles from natural law.
> my only choice
Each ones free will of choice cannot be taken into possession (my) without contradicting it being free.
> They can
They haven't yet. Your fear towards what they could, provides the power for what they can.
/v/TellTalk viewpost?postid=68121386e8481
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 1 day ago
> AI models caused by lack of original
Nature implies original cause for each effect within...artificial implies effects affecting each other, while ignoring natural cause.
There cannot be a lack of origin...only each beings lack of self discernment about originating as effect within cause.
> ouroboros
Aka a snake eating its own tail...eating its own tail represents circular logic within self turning into conflicts of reason against others aka mutual self destruction. The snake represents the forked tongue of ignoring natural (sound) for artificial (words).
/v/Interesting viewpost?postid=6811bbfa6938c
ImplicationOverReason -1 points 1 day ago
Zurich... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Zionist_Congress#/media/File:%D7%A6%D7%99%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9A_-_%D7%95%D7%A2%D7%99%D7%93%D7%AA_%D7%A7%D7%A7%22%D7%9C-JNF008283.jpeg
/v/MeanwhileOnTwitter viewpost?postid=6811c92ae9092
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 1 day ago*
> I am that I am
a) I am aka je suis (jesus)...a taking possession over self, while ignoring the natural procession (inception towards death) of potential (life).
b) That aka a neuter (neither female; nor male) of se (male) and seo (female) aka suggested the-ism (the/this/that) neutering the separation of all perceivable (male) into each ones perception (female).
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/that
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/thatness
c) Taking possession over self (proclaiming) as "me; myself or I" labels every other one as a YOU (phonetic jew), hence ones choice selecting a chosen one...
>In other words, he is saying, "I am God!"
God implies sound/sanus (entire; whole; all)...words are shaped within sound to tempt those who hold onto DEFINITIONS to become DEAF PHONETICIANS aka deaf to phonics (sound).
Example...suggested words like "insane person" tempt one to ignore being in sanus (within sound) and per sonos (by sound), hence a by product within sound aka a mind structured within aka an in-stru-ment...
Masonic aka MAG (to knead, fashion, fit) SONIC (sound)...a freemason utilizes "free" will of choice to shape (ma) sound (son) into words aka spell-craft. A word is shaped by what? Letters aka ones consent LETTING another shape LETTERS into words aka word/verb/were - "to speak"
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/verb
> the name of God has been lost.
Been lost implies being (life) within loss (inception towards death) aka a separation of temporary growth within ongoing loss. This internal separation prevents matter (life) through momentum (inception towards death) from motion aka "unmoved mover"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmoved_mover
While within motion...one cannot give motion a name without ignoring that motion moves. Denying motion represents the foundation for idolatry (holding onto ideals) and nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing).
Motion isn't a name, but an implication of MO (mote) TION (action) aka of a partial reaction (life) within an enacting whole (inception towards death) aka of each anointed one (christ) divided/divined within holy/whole of all (god).
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6811b6e41643a
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 2 days ago
Tortured and then killed by whom...order followers?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6810c4d2b4c73
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 3 days ago
"Hey kid; I'm from the future and I brought you these"... https://img.gvid.tv/i/275QkHDo.jpg
/v/pics viewpost?postid=680f7d7685952
ImplicationOverReason 2 points 1 week ago
From "it doesn't matter if you're black or white" to "kick me; kike me; don't you black or white me"...
/v/Interesting viewpost?postid=680a6fe21b4a0
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 1 week ago
> my great-grandmother died in a genocide
Can't help himself using an alleged genocide as the foundation of being a jew.
> jewish nazis
a) Aka ashke-nazis, but acknowledging that would dissolve the foundation for the alleged genocide.
b) Aka nazirite aka talmudic nazir...yet another alleged foundation of judaism.
c) Sidenote...remember Karl Heinz Schneider from that Captain Tsubasa manga? Well, that character is based on Karl Heinz Schneider aka Reuel Abraham aka the first nazi who converted to judaism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuel_Abraham
>supremacy
A chosen one pointing the finger at supremacy...
/v/JewsJewingJews viewpost?postid=6808a7731cd79
ImplicationOverReason -1 points 1 week ago
What's creepy is how easy gentiles allow themselves to be fooled with words like "doppelgänger" and "instagram" to distract from Iraqis killing Algerians within Germany...
/v/Interesting viewpost?postid=6807276e49209
ImplicationOverReason 5 points 1 week ago
> the engine for the "grand theft auto"
The first two or from the third onward, because the originals where more like "driving into walls" simulators.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=68066e0d9aab6
ImplicationOverReason -1 points 1 week ago
> Why do panic attacks feel like heart attacks
a) Because hostilities feel alike to the one hosting. Both attacks are based on what one permitted into self, hence assault by invite.
b) Panic implies fear of suggested outcome, which is based on ones ignorance of perceivable origin.
> How tf do you deal with them
a) Suggested deal tempts ones consent into a "contract"...what's the opposite of contraction? Try that.
b) Perceivable deal/dæl - "part of a whole"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/deal implies being a part (perception) of a whole (perceivable), which one ignores when giving consent to a suggestion.
/v/askanon viewpost?postid=68051baa2e140
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 1 week ago
> Centrism, an artificial...
a) ISM implies the artificial, each being implies the center (choice) of nature (balance). It's each being giving consent to a suggested -ism by free will of choice, which imbalances oneself by doing so.
b) Being within nature implies want within need aka essential being, wielding the free will of choice to ignore necessity of nature (perceivable) for each others extravagant artifices (suggested).
/v/Universal viewpost?postid=68050dc839330
ImplicationOverReason -3 points 1 week ago
> moralizing
Consent given to suggested moralism prevents uniqueness. Unique implies apart from one another, not consenting to one another within a collective moral framework.
Same shit with activism...action (active) generates reaction (reactive) by internal separation. If one reacts to another ones suggested active-ism, then one ignores to reactivate self when joining others, hence mutually draining each others passive stance.
> focus
Focusing narrows sight. Nature (all perceivable) offers each being (ones perception) a widespread sight. Others broadcast suggestions to tempt ones sight to narrow itself by focusing.
/v/WhiteGenocide viewpost?postid=6805009f1f0c2
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 1 week ago
> Slaves have choice
Slave chooses (consent) master (suggestion). One cannot master a slave without submission being given willingly.
> Salvation or no salvation is the choice
a) Salvation or no salvation imply suggested SELECTIONS for ones free will of choice...choosing either puts both against each other within a conflict of reason (salvation vs damnation).
b) NO implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) which tempts one to de-nial perceivable for suggested.
c) Salvation implies salva/salvus/sol (whole) + ation (action) aka whole action (inception towards death) for each partial reaction (life) within.
> We are all slaves.
Nature sets each one apart from one another aka singularity. Few suggest pluralism (we) to tempt each singular (one) to join together, hence establishing a commonwealth of many under the sovereignty of few aka slaves (we) under master (chosen one).
> Prisoners have no choice
a) Only within dominance (balance) can one be free (choice), hence free-dom aka free (life) during dominance (inception towards death).
b) Imprisonment and confinement implies ment/mentis (mind). If one ignores perceivable for suggested, then one permits others to exploit darkness (ignorance) to refract light (discernment) within a mental prism/prison... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM
/v/USPolitics viewpost?postid=680252eacbc6b
ImplicationOverReason -1 points 1 week ago
He describes dialectic as two sides (or more) pushing a center...that's a deception. Ones choice represents center of balance, and choosing to hold onto any side brings imbalance to ones choice.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6804007483022
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 1 week ago*
Neither did the Wallenberg family fell down, nor was anything taken over from them. Articles like these are written to distract gentiles from the family motto "Esse, non Videri"...
/v/WeaknessOfWesternCulture viewpost?postid=6803c605e6378
ImplicationOverReason -1 points 1 week ago
> they really do want you as a slave
Wanting implies from another while one ignores need. It's therefore choosing want (fiction) over need (reality), which makes one a slave and another ones master.
> They actually don't want you to have any leisure time.
Leisure implies license...ones "free" will of choice doesn't require license. Few suggest many leisure as "freedom from necessary occupations", which tempts each ones to ignore being free (life) within dom (inception towards death); hence each ones necessity to resist wanted temptations.
There's no freedom from anything, only free within dominance of everything.
> different than slavery
Few shape suggestions...if many consent; then the suggested shackle binds a consenting slave to a suggesting master. Without consent...a master cannot bind a slave, because of each ones FREE will of choice.
/v/USPolitics viewpost?postid=680252eacbc6b
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 weeks ago
> The fact that a circle exists proves the concept of eternity and infinity.
a) Infinity + eternity aka finite within ether.
b) Fact implies you holding onto a fictitious state, while ignoring natural motion. It's this choice to hold onto a state, which tricks one to think circumstantial, hence from within circular logic.
c) The shape of a circle one sees implies the ongoing separation of all perceivable and each temporary ones sight within. You are being tricked to use "fact" + "prove" + "concept" to hold onto a shape (circular); while ignoring the foundation for shaping aka motion (linear).
> You see, if there was no such thing as...
One cannot see NO (nothing). One thing (partial perception) within everything (perceivable whole) can be tricked with suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) to de-nial perceivable reality for suggested fiction by holding onto what nature moves.
> if there was no such thing as eternity and infinity...
...then ones denial of being finite (life) within ether (inception towards death) would permits other ones (chosen ones) to suggest the words "eternity" and "infinity" to describe whatever one denies at will. If one denies perceivable, then one agrees with suggested...hence natural balance for each beings free will of choice.
> as your circle neared completion
YOUR aka taking possession over yourself, while ignoring that nature (action) separates potential (reactions) from one another. Reaction implies center (life) of linear action (inception towards death).
The circle of life; wheel of fortune; leap of faith; band of hope till we find our place on the path unwinding represents a suggested distraction from the lion (lying) king (of judah)... https://genius.com/Elton-john-circle-of-life-lyrics
> you would be closing the distance between where you started and where you currently are by half forever
a) Distance implies each ones divided (dis) stance within all.
b) All opens (inception) and closes (death) each one (life), hence each being living (temporary growth) within process of dying (ongoing loss).
c) Measuring ones divided stance as half tempts one to ignore being within all current aka alone...all(in)one aka all for one and one for all aka energy (internal/inherent power).
Current implies flowing; being implies formed (life) during flow (inception towards death). When you write "currently"; then you suggest "formerly"...as if both wouldn't exist simultaneously.
A jew suggests currently and obviously "currency" to distract gentiles from discerning self to formed within flow.
d) Forever implies ever forwards (inception towards death generating life) aka always (way of all for each one within).
> If you try to connect the beginning point to the end point...
...then you ignore that nature separates them before one can try to artificially connect them aka ouroboros eating its own tail.
Velocity (inception towards death) implies linear; resistance (life) can be tempted to shape circular logic by those who utilize compass and square to shape idols/ideals for one to hold onto.
Consenting to a temptation (want) ignores resisting (need)...it's ones free will of choice.
> provable by calculating π to the last digit
The one (life) calculating cannot last (inception towards death)...a humble pie (π) to swallow.
> you could never complete the circle
Never aka "nothing everything"... a contradiction in terms. That's the logical circle within your mind, which you think is complete, but depletes your resistance by holding it together. If you choose to let go of "nothing", then you'll see the linear progression of "everything".
Drawing circles on the ground to entrap demons in witchcraft...that's circular logic trapping one from discerning self as dai (division) within mon (provision). That's also why a jew runs the dai-mon (diamond) trade...because circular logic makes a gentile a trader/traitor to linear thinking...
https://genius.com/Shirley-bassey-diamonds-are-forever-lyrics
> the same logic
Nature implies same; being implies difference...logic implies likeness among beings, which permits few to control (roll together) many. Ones consent to suggested THE-ism establishes likeness.
> to say the exact opposite.
Nature generates opposites (balance) through separation (choice); saying artificial words puts consent and suggestion together, hence ignoring separation (choice) by "turning" opposites against each other (imbalance).
> proves vs disproves
Aka circular logic within oneself turning into a conflict of reason against one another, while ignoring the linear progression of nature moving (inception towards death) matter (life) into shape.
/v/conspiracy viewpost?postid=67ffc61b4c850
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 2 weeks ago
> is (currently) shut down
Natural current cannot be shut down...ones consent to an artificial currency permits other ones to flip an on/off switch at will.
> 4chan
Aka FOR CHANNELING...
> Why?
Shutting supply of currency down increases demand.
> Was it hacked by users who wanted to expose the jews running it?
To hack implies setting apart...world wide web implies a uniting together. Nature sets apart each being from one another...a jew suggests the world wide web to unite consenting gentiles together, while tempting them to get afraid of being "hacked" by others. That represents a wolf scaring the flock of sheep together to prevent single sheep to escape.
As for exposing a jew...to whom? To ignorant gentiles being exploited for their ignorance by a jew? A jew represents the natural response to gentile ignorance of nature...as long as gentiles continue to ignore nature, so long does each jew continue to utilize artificial temptations to destroy and exploit gentiles.
> Was it a legitimate free speech site that was exposing the jews elsewhere and was shut down by them?
a) Only each ones free will of choice is free to speak...speaking implies utilizing the suggested spell-craft (words) by others, which tempts one to bind ones choice to a chosen ones suggestion.
b) The shield of antisemitism requires a jew to switch alleged persecution by gentiles on and off. The issue isn't a jew, but gentile ignorance exploited by a jew.
> It seems like those are the only options.
Option implies "to choose" aka ones free will of choice...not the suggested options others are suggesting one to choose.
> Unless you have something outside the circle...?
That which moves outside the circle one cannot "have" aka take possession of...it's taking possession aka consenting to suggested information, which establishes circular logic within self, while ignoring perceivable inspiration outside.
One cannot hold onto inspiration, only draw from it, to shape within it, while it moves through one.
/v/conspiracy viewpost?postid=67ffc61b4c850
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 weeks ago
> Well. That clarifies everything.
How about this...PSYCHO implies the animating power of nature; LOGICAL implies ones ignorance thereof while thinking about artifice; OPERATION implies another ones artificial suggestion tempting one into logical thinking.
It's a psy-op, because the one using circular logic cannot see outside the circle, hence confining self mentally.
From your perspective...can you think outside of true vs false logic or do you think you only have these two sides to choose from? Could there be something else outside of true or false information suggested to you?
/v/conspiracy viewpost?postid=67ffc61b4c850