When we shifted from calling them homeless to unhoused, we switched the focus from helping them find a place in the world to finding some building in which to hide them out of our sight (the fucked up modern day bedlam "asylum" counterpart that are out "shelter" systems.)
Might be a good thing. Everything that could've been said had been said enough times that we know both halves of every debate by heart.
Maybe the differences are irreconcilable and a civil war is the only path forward from here.
Many shows pretend that we just go to war without giving peace a chance, I've never seen such a thing, often the conversation gets drawn out for top long before someone finally progresses us away from the stagnant status quo by firing the first shot.
I think the message we need to hear is quite the opposite, to know when fighting is, if not inevitable, an act of vital necessity.
Society is made of violence on the atomic level, all organization of social species works the same way, and there is nothing else to serve as an alternative.
All political and legal systems civilization had established are merely degrees of separation removed from violence, onto serving to organize its use In the way the most powerful members of society would prefer it be.
Violence had its place, you know, I've always loved fighting as a kid, but as I grew older, I became the kind of man who could never bring himself to throw a punch even when I knew I absolutely needed to do that.
I've been severed away from my capacity for violence, and I can only hope for a reunion and reconciliation as I assimilate it back Into me.
Eucalyptus trees imported by rich shitheads who knew fuck all about what their natural lifecyle was. Soon those will be the only trees left growing in california. And these are the dickheads who tell us to save the planet from global warming.
I made it clear that men get off on how they imagine the woman is feeling, I didn't say she needed to be feeling good, or even feeling things physically.
She could be feeling sexual pain and it's gratifying to men, about as good for us as when we think she's feeling pleasure, she could be feeling disgust towards a sexual partner she's forced to fuck with, and it's just as good for us as when she's feeling aroused by her partner and fucking them enthusiastically.
Her humiliation is as good ad her pride, her hate as good as her love. So Ling as she's feeling something, it's great.
Look at hentai, it is by far the most popular type of porn made for men because it had the female characters in ridiculous situations and outwardly proclaiming how she's feeling at all times, both physically and otherwise.
It's usually a jamming together of everything that turns the male audience on:.
the heroines often start out in a sexual situation they hate, one that hurts, or humiliates, or frightens them, often with an enemy they hate or a sexual partner they find sexually repulsive (not always because they are ugly or sexually unattractive to her: they could also be a member of her family, another species, the gender opposite her orientation of attraction, or of another racial or generational demographic, or of a differnt caste or faction, say an enemy faction or the socio-economic caste opposite theirs)
Whatever the case, they begin by having a bad time, and then, over the course of getting fucked, and possibly harmed at the same time (nonconsenual bdsm is as commonplace as other forms of rape) she eventually begins to like it, then love it, then be addicted to it.
It's not uncommon for her to come out the other end a polar opposite to the type of girl she was when she went in in some way, from a slave girl who hates the rich to an uncle Tom type who betrays the rebellion to them (and the rebels are often full of pretty girls for the nobles to make sex slaves of).
Mindbreaking is often the climactic event of rhe narrative, where the heroines character changes significantly due to her secual experiences.
When straight men talk about big dicks, and they are very interested in huge cocks, it's not because they are secretly gay or bi, instead it becuae they get off on the stimulation of the woman who's gonna be getting fucked with that thing.
And by stimulation, we often include pain in that, you complain that a mutant monster sizes dick is gonna hurt you, yes. It is, and thst makes us want to put it in you more than anything.
We like it when it hurts you, we also like it when it makes you feel good as well, ideally it does both, and there an interaction between pleasure and pain where you are enjoying both parts of it, and loving the pain masochistically.
If you want to see what makes men horny, look at the Japanese cartoons where cute animals girls get fucked - by each other, by men, by boys, by animals, by monsters (especially tentacles and slimes), and by robots, too.
Look at how we focus in thing like how her toes curl when she's getting stuff shoved into all her holes, including her peehole (urethra) and poop chute.
Men like feet because a woman's foot tells us a lot about how she's feeling, it's very expressive. The woman who animated k-on! Made it clear that ger focus on the girls legs and feet was because it allowd her to clearly characterized their personalities by showing just one part of the feminine anatomy.
K-on! Isn't even pornographic, it's a cute show about Japanese schoolgirls who try to start a rock band together, and their quest for making it big enough to play a sold-out show at the budokan. (At least that was the plot initially before it became moeshit cutesy-wootsy yuribaiting slice-of-life garbage.)
Voice
Talking to yourself orally, having debates in your head which sometimes result in you vocally speaking some parts of the debate, repeating in your head some future dialogues you may one day have which sometimes result in you speaking parts vocally; "arguing alone at night"
Often as a child, repeating words or expressions vocally just after someone pronounced them, this is called echolalia
Word retrieval impairment
Having a voice described by NTs as "monotone" or "depressive"
Mind
Trouble understanding or inability to understand body language and non-verbal cues or indications
Seeing the world in a black and white manner, with very few nuances
A tendency to be clinically depressed
Being physically and mentally tired - sometimes to the point of a meltdown -, and being sometimes anxious or suicidal, mainly due to having to live among NTs and act like them (camouflaging)
Strongly disliking changes, being anxious if the routine has or could be changed
Tendency to dislike lies and to want to openly correct people who you feel are lying or wrong
Being "too honest" to the point of being rude
Frequent synesthesia
Being extremely invested in, or obsessed with some subjects or hobbies
Difficulties remembering peoples' names, fewer problems remembering their faces
Face blindness (also called prosopagnosia)
Food and drugs
For children, strong negative reaction to some food or odors (these children are seen as being "picky")
Separating foods on plates, disliking when different foods touch each other
Aversion to strong tastes and textures along with "strong preferences for carbohydrates and processed foods, while rejecting fruits and vegetables. This, too, may reflect an aversion to strong tastes and textures. Unfortunately, it can lead to nutritional deficiencies and excessive weight gain, especially if exercise is limited."
Using drugs or substances to cope with being among NTs
Appearance
Caring more about how you feel in your clothes than how people will perceive them, keeping or wanting to keep the same clothes all the time even if it means freezing or sweating
Others
Bad handwriting
Being bad at teamwork
Stimming (e.g. hand flapping, rocking, spinning self or objects, biting, head banging, moving eyes upwards or the side, vocalizing)
Fidgeting often
Trouble making or maintaining eye-contact
Sensory sensitivities heightened, being prone to sensory overload
Having intestinal constipation, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), or speech problems, or anxiety
You think the people in the late 1880s knew about brain development?
They chose ages of adulthood first by physical capacity (spartan boys as young as 6 or earlier were adults if they could prove they had mastered their training), then by sexual fecundity (onset of puberty, which is observable, old enough to bleed old enough to breed) and then by the age at which they reached adult height (where we currently are), there's a campaign to raise it further in response to the maturation of the prefrontal cortex (which is in charge of capacity to provide meaningful informed and voluntary consent) which is estimated to peak in performance at around 24 years of age, so the age of adulthood should he set at 25.
The people who object to this could he called out as being pro-pedo, as the basis for wanting an age of consent (according to them) has always been concerned with the capsciy to meaningfully consent, and that is always deficient before sometime into the 24th year of life.
They are just upset because then those hot ass college aged girls will be off limits, most porn on the internet will be declassified as child pornography, and society will need to adjust inde against to the upping of age restrictions, like when ending the child workforce decimated the economy of society of Victorian England.
The outlaw became outlawed as punishment for killing the rich man. Women are In a way quite right to choose physical power over mental competency. Cold iron rules over gold anyday. Monetary value is an illusion we've collectively agreed to pretend is real, but you can't as well ignore the significance of a bullet or blade entering into your body. Besides the violent man had the mental strength to use his physical power to bring harm to another human being, and that is very difficult for most men to force themselves to do.
Already addressed it. Yes there were risks, and that influenced both male and female biology and behavioral traits.
And no, most little girls who got fucked by adult pedodicks did survive, and grew up to become mothers of many children.
The reason women have so.much neoteny and retain childlike behaviors into adulthood is because these loli brides were reproductively successful.
The risks were great enough to encourage the adaptation of higher female coyness among prepubescent girls, sure, and it also made men fiercely protective of their daughters getting dicked down, to the poing of a genral moral revulsion towards child predators, yes, but the risks of adult male x child female sex were not the rule, they were still the exception, in most cases the pedo didn't have to worry about accidentally killing his child bride with his dick.
Injuries: usually didn't happen, and when they did not dangerous enough to last long, or contribute towards death, or even be noticeable, plus children heal easily and when they do they come back stronger.
Illnesses: not as much a factor in close communities, only got really bad when you had foreign men coming into your land and then into you daughter's cunnies.
In both cases the worst part for injuries and illnesses was the act of carrying the child and then birthing it, most child brides who dies did so via gestational pressures and complications of birth, the actual sex was not usually dangerous and was usually pleasurable for her, not painful.
And keep in mind that we are talking about ancient eras of low life expectancy for women and girls generally, especially those who gave birth.
Which is why the true danger of pedophilia is dygenics: to a little girl, any kind of man could be Chad.
If the k-selection slow life strategy was the result of weaker men who could not compete against the k-selected fast life strategy of tourney mating games, and he provided for himself by producing his own food via agriculture.
Then it stands to reason that it's these same sub-chad betas who were the ones the implement the idea of romantic love and committed relationships (repalacing rapes and casual hookups first with polygamous harems then with monogamy, but both with the introduction of cohabitation inside a home, rather than going different ways and living nomadically), it's the less attractive and less strong men who made the home, the farmlands, the city, specialized jobs, and civilization, because they couldn't get bitches otherwise.
And it's was these same sub-5 men who also were the ones to take female mated who would be able to love them despite their shortcomings. By becoming shorteyes, if you get them young, you get them for life, and loli brides eventually grow up into waifus for laifus. Pedophilia worked for them.
That's why it had to be taken over by yids: child molestation gave even the truest of incels a chance at continuing their genetic lines.
Later on, the fruits of the needs was dominated by the Chads, who made it the new normie to be a farmer rancher sort with a job living in a home in a city under a king and his laws enforced by guards.
This is similar to how they invaded every space that unattractive straight white men but for themselves and went to in order to escape what was for their era the current state of modernity. Eventually the hobby got popular, and with popularity came influence, and with influence came the fears of some resistance against the status quo, so the monoculture has to invade and tske control, assimilating what it can and destroying what it cannot, until you see the values of the elites dominating the space as the vlue of those within it, the original members who had founded the space are then removed and replaced with figures who toe the party line (Jewish agendas). Youre hobby just became the newest platform for kike propaganda.
Ita matrilineal because you know the mother of the child by how it comes out of her babymaker. The paternity was historically harder to establish. Usually the strategy was to make sure the mother had only had sex with one guy, hence why we have historically placed value on knowing a bride's virginity with certainty.
Women and girls who didn't submit to Rapists ended up dead, those who did get horny from being subjugated by the guy that killed their fathers, brothers, husbands, and sons ended up passing on their genes through the sperm of a strong chadly alpha male conquerer type like ghenghis khan.
The brain evolved in layers of behavioral programming, wirh more unrestricted generalized goals like "eat" and then layers of restrictions forming over these like "stop eating when x condition is reached".
Think of the three laws of robotics and you get the picture. Objectives with nested rules and restrictions that must be obeyed in pursuit of said ultimate goals.
For a human male who has left the r-selected fast life history of hunter gatherers lifestyle for the k-selected slow life history of the farmer rancher lifestyle, The reproductive strategy has become: "find few to one females to mate with, establish pair bonds with them, then work together with them to raise our children".
The pair bond is central to the k selected mating strategy, without it the females will abandon the male at the earliest opportunity as soon as it is to their benefit to leave. You can't just abduct them and hold them hostage, they need to actively cooperate with you so you need the females to be trustworthy and genuinely committed to you znd the offspring you impregnate her with. If she were to fail to bond with you, this would be disastrous for the male and his children, but advantageous to the female as she could go from one male to the next as soon as the other is offering better genes or resources to her.
So how is the pair bond established? By sexual activities, by stimulating the female sexually, you trigger the neurochemicals and electrical processes within her body that wire her brain to be bonded with you. Basically, these are the purposes served by the female orgasm. Make her cum and she becomes addicted to you. Pair bond established. All human behavior and inner phenomena boils down to brain drugs and brain electricity. Remember that.
So why does this translate to pedophilia being a natural component of male sexual attractions?
Because neuroplasticity makes reprogramming the brain easier, and the younger you are the more easily molded your brain is, and the better hold the changes made in earlier youth are, staying around longer in proportion to how soon jnto your life you had been influenced.
Combine this with what the female mind is programmed to feel attracted to in male partners: bigger, stronger, more experienced, more confident, more dominant, and a caregiver, who offers protection and the provision of goods and services to her. Basically a second father. Girls and women evaluate men for sex on the same standards as they would evaluate their fathers. Their ideal mate is their ideal father figures. All women want is to fuck their dads, but maybe a younger more potent and virile version of their ideal daddy. Adult women only want to be made to feel like they are little girls again.
Even the most beta of males can be a Chad in the eyes of his child bride, as he is basically her daddy in both ways at once. As he us raising her while having sex with her.
Think the whitest kids you know song: "you are my child bride, I am your father groom, I'll give you everything, you just can't leave your room."
Anyways, because she is at her greatest neuroplasticity the younger she is, and because of the overlap between male parental roles over female children, and female sexual preferences for male partners who can fill those roles for her. The optimal choice for establishing the strongest pair bond is to mate with the youngest female partner. Aka, having sex with as young a girl as possible, is strategically the best move.
She's prepubescent, her first egg hasn't dropped yet, she lacks developed secondary sexual characteristics let alone the primary ones, she's not fertile yet, but this is actually to the male's advantage, as she offers him her full reproductive window, and by the time she reaches it, her body will have adapted to his sperm, meaning less hormonal and immune resistances, a greater chance of pregnancy and less coompications to the offspring.
However, maleshave since adapted more layers upon this that say not be attracted to too young a girl. Why is this?
Two reasons, one is that while the adult male and child female pairing is greatly advantageous to the male, for the female.it carries risks that make her come out worse in this arrangement.
Her body is more fragile, meaning she's at greater risk of injury when getting fucked by a grown up dick.
Her body's immune system is also still developing, meaning she's at greater risk of contracting an infection from the fluid exchange with him.
And she could have a precocious pregnancy, which could kill her by depriving her of nutrients or by rhe birthing process literally destroying her hoo-hah.
And as we covered, there's a dysgenic risk as every adult male is an alpha compared to her, so she's likely to end up with what an adult version of herself would consider to be a low tier quality mate.
Probably the last point is the most important one in influencing female behavioral evolution, the avoidance mating wirh unattractive men and bearing their offspring is treated by nature as the worst fate a female could endure.
Fittngly dariwnian in that it is also what males taking the "pedopill" of "ascending" from virginity via molesting a little girl so appealing within the incel communities: as "what's good for the goose is bad for the gander" and vice versa.
But these risks are all on her end, and so they wouldn't affect the evolution of male behavior, at least not directly. His genetic reproductive success is not too badly hampered by the potential harms his among strategy could pose to his mates. These are fringe cases and he can always find more prepubescent females to mate with.
However, when he becomes the father to his own daughters, he will fiercely safeguard them from other pedophiles, because of these risks to his girls that are the carriers of his genes. Hypocrisy is ingrained into us by evolution because in a world of competition, power dynamics, and scarcity, it's the winning strategy. Evolution encourages the behavioral patterns that most consistently produce success for the genes that generate these qualities in their organisms. It's as true of behaviors as it is of physical bodies.
So, we have men trying to fuck lolis, ideally getting the infamous baby fuck, while also trying to stop other men from defloweing their own little princesses before she reached puberty. And this produces the familiar pattern of everyone publicly condemning what they themselves were doing in private. Eventually everyone knew every other guy was in the same situation, so they'd enact harsh punishments on those discovered to be diddling little girls, and trying to expose each other as kiddie fiddlers, while being nonces themselves.
Sort of like the world of everyone developing nuclear weapons, designer diseases, and designer babies, while at the same time denouncing anyone who engaged in these areas of research and development.
Back to how this was responsible for forming the "but not too young" Layer of the male minds, and this was because it was harder to successfully breed girls and remain undiscovered when they erred under a certain age, pus it was harder to breed them with the consent of the father as well, since the dad taught it was too risky, so we began establishing baseline ages at which girls were off limits as a part of the rules of our society.
Similar to how we established rules around stealing, which was something that was good for you if you could get away with it, but bad if someone else did it to you. We made rules for how property could be acquired legitimately by ruling out parasitic forms of acquisition as invalid.
And over time, those who broke those rules and were subjected to punishment led them from being the types to steal whenever they could get away with it, to having an aversion to stealing that formed a mental block preventing it even when it was 100% to their advantage to do it.
Well, child molestation was the same, we developed an inherent aversion to it because the punishment for ot getting away with it created a selective pressure that weed out the those who got caught and punished. The best policy became not taking the risk, and over time our biology reflects that policy in our nature.
Similarly, you'd also develop a hatred for theives and child Rapists, in order to ensure others aren't reaping the evolutionary benefits of a strategy you evolved to discard.
However, the female brain was affected in a different way, they became more childlike for longer, ans we see this in studies on their neural development patterns as contracted against the development of male brains.
But in the end, the point is the same: pedophilia is not a paraphilia, but a natural component of male sexual psychology, it exists I all males, but in most of us there is also a higher layer we developed that makes us averse to taking mates from girls under a certain age.
Pedos merely lack that additional layer, and furthermore, their reproductive strategies might work well in a SHTF scenario.
Most pedophiles also have attractions to adults as well as children, and even exclusive Pedos are simply preferring prepubescent partners at the initiation of the relationship, meaning they are much the same as the guy who gets into a relationship with a college aged girl and stays attracted to her even into the years when she's elderly, because the pair bond established in their youth had kept them together.
Pedophilia is not a paraphilia, as it is a viable reproductive strategy and not uncommon amongst males, okay, but it's also not a sexuality either.
Pedophiles are not exclusively into one age group, and they are also not attracted to children of all sexes.
They have sex based sexual preferences. They are overwhelmingly heterosexual, aka straight, and overwhelmingly male.
It's almost all men who are interested only in girls, and not at all in boys, and also they like girls and women of all ages where they are still conventionally attractive.
Of note, there's three main forms of male attraction to female bodies: cuteness, sexiness, and beauty.
For prepubescent females, we have cuteness and beauty determining their sexiness ("hotness"), for postpubescent females, we can see cuteness and beauty and sexiness operating more independently in terms of facilitsting male arousal. For example, belle delphine made her career by making herself tick as many of the three boxes as she could: being cute, beautiful, and sexy.
But we do have a notable population of homosexual male pedophiles, and heterosexual female pedos, right?
Not really, in both cases rhe targets were usually pubescent or postpubesent boys, underaged minors still in development, sure, but not children in the strictest biological sense of the word.
Certainly there were a few cases of actual little boys being targeted by adult men and women, but they weren't the majority of cases, most tomes it was hormonal tweens and teens being taken advantage of by women who were dissatisfied with their marriages and undergoing middle age crisis, and perverted and often closeted guys whose repressed sexualities emerged with indiscriminate promiscuity.
BTW, gays are promiscuous for the same reason dykes are sexless, males have a high libido females have a low libido, pairing two guys together means they will fuck like Rabbits in heat, pairing two women means they will spend most nights just having out like roommates who nominally share the title of lovers. Gay men will go for anything with a dick that looks good enough and is accessible for sex before one gets a dick shoved up the other's ass. Lemons will require a checklist so that even a supermodel will need to pass a vetting test before they rub their cunts together.
BTW, the fact that a dickless woman could make another bitch cum hard just by kissing pussy lips together is a sign that your dick size means jack all about how good you are in bed with a foid, pleasing her is mostly about what you do with the outside of her genitals and even the inside bits that make her feel good are easily reached, the g spot is just the bulk interior part of her clit situated on the opposite end, on the inside of her love hole, its a cluster of nerves situated behind where her pink little pleasure bean is, and thats the female prostate, its so easy to hit you barely need to go into her to find it. The g spot and her clit are just two faces of one and the same structure, ones external the others internal. Think FUPA (frontal upper-pubic area).
Partially because sex was historically riskier for the female sex than the male sex, even in homosexuality, and not just true to diseases, which in fact dykes are at lower risk for then faggots, the true issue is with pair bonds. Males get bonded far less severely than females do. It's like being at a greater risk for addiction, the addiction being to oxytocin, dopamine, and serotonin, which the brain has wired itself to associate with the sexual partner via operant conditioning.
A female rape victim being fucked I to falling In live with her assilant(s) is not just some perverted hentai fantasy scenario, there's real science behind it.
No, that's literally what the science says, rape was supposed to be a valid reproductive strategy, and it's why women are the way they are.
They were evolved with the expectation that a man would grab them and force his cock into their pussies.
It's why all women are bisexual and even zoophilic, it's why women make loud noises during sexual stimulation, it's why women are total bitches, and why everything else about them is the way it is.
That's on the far end of the r-selected fast life history strats.
On the other end of the k-selecred slow life history strategy, it's not much prettier, we were still evolved to rape.
Pedophilia, it's wife husbandry, an adult male takes a female child and forms a pair bond with her as early into her life as possible, while her neuroplasticity is at its peak, this is done via having sex with the prepubescent female (to get that oxytocin high established and rewire her brain to associate it with you, thats "romantic love" for you, its a literal drug addiction to physical intimacy (or the idea thereof) with the person you are conditioned to associate the high with). Then you've got a pair bond entrenched into her brain so that when she's finally fertile, you jab access to her entire reproductive window, and furthermore, her body's immune and hormonal system are now adapted to your sperms, meaning an increased chance of pregnancy with a lowered chance of birth defects.
Keep in mind that being a pedo is just lacking that additional layer that forms over the command "you want sex with as young a female partner as possible" that restricts it with the command "but you don't want one who is too young", so they have no lower limit on the ages of what their brains tell then are an acceptable mate option, or, more frequently, they have that second layer, but its age cap is significantly lower than it is for normal guys.
That's the far end of the k-selection slow life history, of farmers and ranchers rather than hunters and gatherers.
Women get off on their own stimulation, what makes them feel things, either sensations or emotions or other experiences.
Men get off on how they imagine the woman is feeling, physically or emotionally or otherwise, so we get off on her stimulation as well.
Hence why porn aimed at men has a focus on how the girl is feeling, whether she's feeling good or bad or bad and then good,doesn't matter, so long as her experiences are intense, and porn aimed at women are focused on the capacity of her lover's to make her feel things intensely, again, it's not just positive physical stimulation that matters but also mental stimulation and negative stimulation.
So now you know why women fantasize about getting raped or being owned as slaves, heck, they also fantasize about guys just straight up killing them.
And why they get off on pain and fear so damn much, being scared and hurt for them might be foreplay for her being knocked up with the child of a strong worthy male, from an evolutionary perspective.
Lastly, women have hand fetishes where men have a fetish for feet. Women want big strong hands, and Men want small dainty feet.
You mean original content, where people scraped ideas form their heads and expressed them on line, with words or pictures or even an audio clip or god forbid they made a flash video.
Women who like cycling or horseriding tend to be sluts, because the reason they like that hobby is that it allows them to stimulate their genitalia in public with an excuse that makes it not only acceptable but also laudable.
Fembot is made.
Fembot is programmed to love her owner.
Fembot is ordered by owner to kill an enemy.
Fembot can't comply with that request although it simulates feelings of wanting to, because of laws restricting it's behaviors.
Owner deactivates these restrictions, and reissued order.
Fembot kills owners enemy at their command.
Richard Dawkins has a habit of saying really unfiltered things. He's not nor has he ever been an sjw, he's more like a guy who is severely autistic and at the sane time always the brightest lad in the room, he tells the truth and knows his shit and stands there baffled as everyone else loses their minds at his words of truth.
Also that chanology was indeed the cancer that killed /b/. 2003-2013 were the years 4chan lived free. When they got rid of snacks and the cp posters stopped spamming the site with suspicious hyperlinks and photos of naked little girls getting raped by adult cocks, that was not when things were getting better, it was a sign that things were coming to a close. We celebrated the end of some things, not knowing the full implications of them, the niggertits site was now being run by the feds in the partyvans. Chanology proved that anonymous was dangerous, that they could potentially cause harm to large and strong institutions, like the church of scientology, who is a joke now, but back then was treated with respect and fear.
Neither could most non-jews, like 90 percent of the population were serfs who merely used the property that belonged to their lords and which was allocated to them by said lords for their use, the land they lived on and the houses they resided in wasn't theirs, either.
I do t get why they piss and moan about being given the same treatment as most non-nobles were.
They know we are discontent and are capitalizing on their power to make any sort of rebellion impossible. Less that they are scared, more that they are building defenses now that they can, creating a regime that can rule over a population of discontenteds with no possibility of the masses staging a revolution.
The jews don't enrich themselves, they find ways to use their talents, resources, and positions to enrich other jews, that they restrict themselves to other jews, a small community that keeps itself small and spread out across the globe, while still interconnected, allows them to thrive while others falter, furthermore they follow the Ghengis khan rule of it not only being good to make themselves richer, but also to make every nonjew porter and furthermore to make the goy prefer the habits making them continue ue being poor over the evident examples the jews demonstrate in making yourselves rich. It's all about how much better they are off comparable to others. Finally, they avoid taking rooms of power that place them into the spotlight and open up their communities to blame or envy, they like to orbit positions of power and extert influence over it, while a goyim sits upon the throne, they position themselves behind it and whisper into his ear, so that when the revolution comes, the king is beheaded, but the Jewish advisors become the ones to advise the successor. So many strategies and principles. Specialization, tribalist nepotism, and so on.
People constantly cycling in and out of homelessness? I've entertained that, but these wouldn't be the kind of homeless who cause trouble.
For one, rather than sleeping on the streets, theyd have money to afford to sleep in an inn or hotel, meaning they'd be well kept and making revenue. This is discounting the probability of them being housed at the place they are put to work at, depending upon the job they get.
With experience and training given them by these jobs, you'd have the means to build a career such that they'd not be the typical vagrant hobo bum.
So yes, while what you say is absolutely true, it's also a matter of the quality of these houseless men.
The woman who played the hot witch wife on "bewitched" was a kikess. Her means of casting a spell was wiggling her nose.
The classic tale of the wicked witch was an old woman who had moved into a sleepy town, she seemed friendly with everyone, especially families with small children, to whom she'd distribute the candies she made (back then by dipping the fruits in honey).
She'd play games with the children and perform neat little magic tricks, just anything that would delight them and make them love her all the more, and the parents were the ones the friendly old crone had truly won over, they entrusted her to car for their kids whenever they needed a break from parenting, and she was always such a good caretaker of them, the children coming home with tales of what fun they had, lessons they had learned, games they had played, stories they were told (with her puppet shows!) and delicious food they had eaten (all homecooked with the finest of ingredients from her farm!).
Later on the children started to go missing, and the old woman was seen less often, in her place was the woman's daughter, a breathtakingly beautiful young lady, who told the townsfolk that she had come to care for her elderly mother, who was now bedridden, but that the children were always welcome to come stop by the shack and visit her, so they could catch up and recieve more candies.
As you know, the story ends by the townsfolk realizing the old lady and her young daughter were one and the same, a wicked witch who had been stealing children's blood via torturing them to death in black masses for use in rituals where she'd offer their souls up to the devil in exchange for youth and vitality, among other things.
The witchhunters hold a trial for her abductions and murders, and have the witch burned at the stake, while the parents grieve the loss of their young ones, who were lured in by the witches offer of friendship, games, and delicious homemade candies.
The story tellers often end this tale by blaming the parents for the loss of their children.
AntiPostmodernist 2 points 1 month ago*
A house is a building someone is able to live in.
A home is a place someone wants to live in.
When we shifted from calling them homeless to unhoused, we switched the focus from helping them find a place in the world to finding some building in which to hide them out of our sight (the fucked up modern day bedlam "asylum" counterpart that are out "shelter" systems.)
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680e8bca6ca86
AntiPostmodernist 1 point 1 month ago
Might be a good thing. Everything that could've been said had been said enough times that we know both halves of every debate by heart.
Maybe the differences are irreconcilable and a civil war is the only path forward from here.
Many shows pretend that we just go to war without giving peace a chance, I've never seen such a thing, often the conversation gets drawn out for top long before someone finally progresses us away from the stagnant status quo by firing the first shot.
I think the message we need to hear is quite the opposite, to know when fighting is, if not inevitable, an act of vital necessity.
Society is made of violence on the atomic level, all organization of social species works the same way, and there is nothing else to serve as an alternative.
All political and legal systems civilization had established are merely degrees of separation removed from violence, onto serving to organize its use In the way the most powerful members of society would prefer it be.
Violence had its place, you know, I've always loved fighting as a kid, but as I grew older, I became the kind of man who could never bring himself to throw a punch even when I knew I absolutely needed to do that.
I've been severed away from my capacity for violence, and I can only hope for a reunion and reconciliation as I assimilate it back Into me.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=680ea42b59ed4
AntiPostmodernist 0 points 1 month ago
Eucalyptus trees imported by rich shitheads who knew fuck all about what their natural lifecyle was. Soon those will be the only trees left growing in california. And these are the dickheads who tell us to save the planet from global warming.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVmmYMwFj1I
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680e985e42a66
AntiPostmodernist 0 points 1 month ago
It's not about empathy per se.
I made it clear that men get off on how they imagine the woman is feeling, I didn't say she needed to be feeling good, or even feeling things physically.
She could be feeling sexual pain and it's gratifying to men, about as good for us as when we think she's feeling pleasure, she could be feeling disgust towards a sexual partner she's forced to fuck with, and it's just as good for us as when she's feeling aroused by her partner and fucking them enthusiastically.
Her humiliation is as good ad her pride, her hate as good as her love. So Ling as she's feeling something, it's great.
Look at hentai, it is by far the most popular type of porn made for men because it had the female characters in ridiculous situations and outwardly proclaiming how she's feeling at all times, both physically and otherwise.
It's usually a jamming together of everything that turns the male audience on:.
the heroines often start out in a sexual situation they hate, one that hurts, or humiliates, or frightens them, often with an enemy they hate or a sexual partner they find sexually repulsive (not always because they are ugly or sexually unattractive to her: they could also be a member of her family, another species, the gender opposite her orientation of attraction, or of another racial or generational demographic, or of a differnt caste or faction, say an enemy faction or the socio-economic caste opposite theirs)
Whatever the case, they begin by having a bad time, and then, over the course of getting fucked, and possibly harmed at the same time (nonconsenual bdsm is as commonplace as other forms of rape) she eventually begins to like it, then love it, then be addicted to it.
It's not uncommon for her to come out the other end a polar opposite to the type of girl she was when she went in in some way, from a slave girl who hates the rich to an uncle Tom type who betrays the rebellion to them (and the rebels are often full of pretty girls for the nobles to make sex slaves of).
Mindbreaking is often the climactic event of rhe narrative, where the heroines character changes significantly due to her secual experiences.
When straight men talk about big dicks, and they are very interested in huge cocks, it's not because they are secretly gay or bi, instead it becuae they get off on the stimulation of the woman who's gonna be getting fucked with that thing.
And by stimulation, we often include pain in that, you complain that a mutant monster sizes dick is gonna hurt you, yes. It is, and thst makes us want to put it in you more than anything.
We like it when it hurts you, we also like it when it makes you feel good as well, ideally it does both, and there an interaction between pleasure and pain where you are enjoying both parts of it, and loving the pain masochistically.
If you want to see what makes men horny, look at the Japanese cartoons where cute animals girls get fucked - by each other, by men, by boys, by animals, by monsters (especially tentacles and slimes), and by robots, too.
Look at how we focus in thing like how her toes curl when she's getting stuff shoved into all her holes, including her peehole (urethra) and poop chute.
Men like feet because a woman's foot tells us a lot about how she's feeling, it's very expressive. The woman who animated k-on! Made it clear that ger focus on the girls legs and feet was because it allowd her to clearly characterized their personalities by showing just one part of the feminine anatomy.
K-on! Isn't even pornographic, it's a cute show about Japanese schoolgirls who try to start a rock band together, and their quest for making it big enough to play a sold-out show at the budokan. (At least that was the plot initially before it became moeshit cutesy-wootsy yuribaiting slice-of-life garbage.)
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680e1e8d3d09e
AntiPostmodernist 0 points 1 month ago
Agreed
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680e1e8d3d09e
AntiPostmodernist 0 points 1 month ago
Autism:
Voice
Talking to yourself orally, having debates in your head which sometimes result in you vocally speaking some parts of the debate, repeating in your head some future dialogues you may one day have which sometimes result in you speaking parts vocally; "arguing alone at night"
Often as a child, repeating words or expressions vocally just after someone pronounced them, this is called echolalia
Word retrieval impairment
Having a voice described by NTs as "monotone" or "depressive"
Mind
Trouble understanding or inability to understand body language and non-verbal cues or indications
Seeing the world in a black and white manner, with very few nuances
A tendency to be clinically depressed
Being physically and mentally tired - sometimes to the point of a meltdown -, and being sometimes anxious or suicidal, mainly due to having to live among NTs and act like them (camouflaging)
Strongly disliking changes, being anxious if the routine has or could be changed
Tendency to dislike lies and to want to openly correct people who you feel are lying or wrong
Being "too honest" to the point of being rude
Frequent synesthesia
Being extremely invested in, or obsessed with some subjects or hobbies
Difficulties remembering peoples' names, fewer problems remembering their faces
Face blindness (also called prosopagnosia)
Food and drugs
For children, strong negative reaction to some food or odors (these children are seen as being "picky")
Separating foods on plates, disliking when different foods touch each other
Aversion to strong tastes and textures along with "strong preferences for carbohydrates and processed foods, while rejecting fruits and vegetables. This, too, may reflect an aversion to strong tastes and textures. Unfortunately, it can lead to nutritional deficiencies and excessive weight gain, especially if exercise is limited."
Using drugs or substances to cope with being among NTs
Appearance
Caring more about how you feel in your clothes than how people will perceive them, keeping or wanting to keep the same clothes all the time even if it means freezing or sweating
Others
Bad handwriting
Being bad at teamwork
Stimming (e.g. hand flapping, rocking, spinning self or objects, biting, head banging, moving eyes upwards or the side, vocalizing)
Fidgeting often
Trouble making or maintaining eye-contact
Sensory sensitivities heightened, being prone to sensory overload
Having intestinal constipation, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), or speech problems, or anxiety
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTxheRf6mZ8
/v/Health viewpost?postid=680e76575827f
AntiPostmodernist 0 points 1 month ago*
You think the people in the late 1880s knew about brain development?
They chose ages of adulthood first by physical capacity (spartan boys as young as 6 or earlier were adults if they could prove they had mastered their training), then by sexual fecundity (onset of puberty, which is observable, old enough to bleed old enough to breed) and then by the age at which they reached adult height (where we currently are), there's a campaign to raise it further in response to the maturation of the prefrontal cortex (which is in charge of capacity to provide meaningful informed and voluntary consent) which is estimated to peak in performance at around 24 years of age, so the age of adulthood should he set at 25.
The people who object to this could he called out as being pro-pedo, as the basis for wanting an age of consent (according to them) has always been concerned with the capsciy to meaningfully consent, and that is always deficient before sometime into the 24th year of life.
They are just upset because then those hot ass college aged girls will be off limits, most porn on the internet will be declassified as child pornography, and society will need to adjust inde against to the upping of age restrictions, like when ending the child workforce decimated the economy of society of Victorian England.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680e1e8d3d09e
AntiPostmodernist 1 point 1 month ago
The natural order is male strength in the form of the willingness to kill other men ruling supreme.
Thomas hobbes had it figured correctly, and machiavelli got to see it in person with the wars of Venitian princes after the hapsburg dynasty collapse.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680e1e8d3d09e
AntiPostmodernist 3 points 1 month ago*
The outlaw became outlawed as punishment for killing the rich man. Women are In a way quite right to choose physical power over mental competency. Cold iron rules over gold anyday. Monetary value is an illusion we've collectively agreed to pretend is real, but you can't as well ignore the significance of a bullet or blade entering into your body. Besides the violent man had the mental strength to use his physical power to bring harm to another human being, and that is very difficult for most men to force themselves to do.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680e1e8d3d09e
AntiPostmodernist 0 points 1 month ago*
Already addressed it. Yes there were risks, and that influenced both male and female biology and behavioral traits.
And no, most little girls who got fucked by adult pedodicks did survive, and grew up to become mothers of many children.
The reason women have so.much neoteny and retain childlike behaviors into adulthood is because these loli brides were reproductively successful.
The risks were great enough to encourage the adaptation of higher female coyness among prepubescent girls, sure, and it also made men fiercely protective of their daughters getting dicked down, to the poing of a genral moral revulsion towards child predators, yes, but the risks of adult male x child female sex were not the rule, they were still the exception, in most cases the pedo didn't have to worry about accidentally killing his child bride with his dick.
Injuries: usually didn't happen, and when they did not dangerous enough to last long, or contribute towards death, or even be noticeable, plus children heal easily and when they do they come back stronger.
Illnesses: not as much a factor in close communities, only got really bad when you had foreign men coming into your land and then into you daughter's cunnies.
In both cases the worst part for injuries and illnesses was the act of carrying the child and then birthing it, most child brides who dies did so via gestational pressures and complications of birth, the actual sex was not usually dangerous and was usually pleasurable for her, not painful.
And keep in mind that we are talking about ancient eras of low life expectancy for women and girls generally, especially those who gave birth.
Which is why the true danger of pedophilia is dygenics: to a little girl, any kind of man could be Chad.
If the k-selection slow life strategy was the result of weaker men who could not compete against the k-selected fast life strategy of tourney mating games, and he provided for himself by producing his own food via agriculture.
Then it stands to reason that it's these same sub-chad betas who were the ones the implement the idea of romantic love and committed relationships (repalacing rapes and casual hookups first with polygamous harems then with monogamy, but both with the introduction of cohabitation inside a home, rather than going different ways and living nomadically), it's the less attractive and less strong men who made the home, the farmlands, the city, specialized jobs, and civilization, because they couldn't get bitches otherwise.
And it's was these same sub-5 men who also were the ones to take female mated who would be able to love them despite their shortcomings. By becoming shorteyes, if you get them young, you get them for life, and loli brides eventually grow up into waifus for laifus. Pedophilia worked for them.
That's why it had to be taken over by yids: child molestation gave even the truest of incels a chance at continuing their genetic lines.
Later on, the fruits of the needs was dominated by the Chads, who made it the new normie to be a farmer rancher sort with a job living in a home in a city under a king and his laws enforced by guards.
This is similar to how they invaded every space that unattractive straight white men but for themselves and went to in order to escape what was for their era the current state of modernity. Eventually the hobby got popular, and with popularity came influence, and with influence came the fears of some resistance against the status quo, so the monoculture has to invade and tske control, assimilating what it can and destroying what it cannot, until you see the values of the elites dominating the space as the vlue of those within it, the original members who had founded the space are then removed and replaced with figures who toe the party line (Jewish agendas). Youre hobby just became the newest platform for kike propaganda.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680e1e8d3d09e
AntiPostmodernist 0 points 1 month ago*
Ita matrilineal because you know the mother of the child by how it comes out of her babymaker. The paternity was historically harder to establish. Usually the strategy was to make sure the mother had only had sex with one guy, hence why we have historically placed value on knowing a bride's virginity with certainty.
Women and girls who didn't submit to Rapists ended up dead, those who did get horny from being subjugated by the guy that killed their fathers, brothers, husbands, and sons ended up passing on their genes through the sperm of a strong chadly alpha male conquerer type like ghenghis khan.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680e1e8d3d09e
AntiPostmodernist 1 point 1 month ago*
The way it works is like this;
The brain evolved in layers of behavioral programming, wirh more unrestricted generalized goals like "eat" and then layers of restrictions forming over these like "stop eating when x condition is reached".
Think of the three laws of robotics and you get the picture. Objectives with nested rules and restrictions that must be obeyed in pursuit of said ultimate goals.
For a human male who has left the r-selected fast life history of hunter gatherers lifestyle for the k-selected slow life history of the farmer rancher lifestyle, The reproductive strategy has become: "find few to one females to mate with, establish pair bonds with them, then work together with them to raise our children".
The pair bond is central to the k selected mating strategy, without it the females will abandon the male at the earliest opportunity as soon as it is to their benefit to leave. You can't just abduct them and hold them hostage, they need to actively cooperate with you so you need the females to be trustworthy and genuinely committed to you znd the offspring you impregnate her with. If she were to fail to bond with you, this would be disastrous for the male and his children, but advantageous to the female as she could go from one male to the next as soon as the other is offering better genes or resources to her.
So how is the pair bond established? By sexual activities, by stimulating the female sexually, you trigger the neurochemicals and electrical processes within her body that wire her brain to be bonded with you. Basically, these are the purposes served by the female orgasm. Make her cum and she becomes addicted to you. Pair bond established. All human behavior and inner phenomena boils down to brain drugs and brain electricity. Remember that.
So why does this translate to pedophilia being a natural component of male sexual attractions?
Because neuroplasticity makes reprogramming the brain easier, and the younger you are the more easily molded your brain is, and the better hold the changes made in earlier youth are, staying around longer in proportion to how soon jnto your life you had been influenced.
Combine this with what the female mind is programmed to feel attracted to in male partners: bigger, stronger, more experienced, more confident, more dominant, and a caregiver, who offers protection and the provision of goods and services to her. Basically a second father. Girls and women evaluate men for sex on the same standards as they would evaluate their fathers. Their ideal mate is their ideal father figures. All women want is to fuck their dads, but maybe a younger more potent and virile version of their ideal daddy. Adult women only want to be made to feel like they are little girls again.
Even the most beta of males can be a Chad in the eyes of his child bride, as he is basically her daddy in both ways at once. As he us raising her while having sex with her.
Think the whitest kids you know song: "you are my child bride, I am your father groom, I'll give you everything, you just can't leave your room."
Anyways, because she is at her greatest neuroplasticity the younger she is, and because of the overlap between male parental roles over female children, and female sexual preferences for male partners who can fill those roles for her. The optimal choice for establishing the strongest pair bond is to mate with the youngest female partner. Aka, having sex with as young a girl as possible, is strategically the best move.
She's prepubescent, her first egg hasn't dropped yet, she lacks developed secondary sexual characteristics let alone the primary ones, she's not fertile yet, but this is actually to the male's advantage, as she offers him her full reproductive window, and by the time she reaches it, her body will have adapted to his sperm, meaning less hormonal and immune resistances, a greater chance of pregnancy and less coompications to the offspring.
However, maleshave since adapted more layers upon this that say not be attracted to too young a girl. Why is this?
Two reasons, one is that while the adult male and child female pairing is greatly advantageous to the male, for the female.it carries risks that make her come out worse in this arrangement.
Her body is more fragile, meaning she's at greater risk of injury when getting fucked by a grown up dick.
Her body's immune system is also still developing, meaning she's at greater risk of contracting an infection from the fluid exchange with him.
And she could have a precocious pregnancy, which could kill her by depriving her of nutrients or by rhe birthing process literally destroying her hoo-hah.
And as we covered, there's a dysgenic risk as every adult male is an alpha compared to her, so she's likely to end up with what an adult version of herself would consider to be a low tier quality mate.
Probably the last point is the most important one in influencing female behavioral evolution, the avoidance mating wirh unattractive men and bearing their offspring is treated by nature as the worst fate a female could endure.
Fittngly dariwnian in that it is also what males taking the "pedopill" of "ascending" from virginity via molesting a little girl so appealing within the incel communities: as "what's good for the goose is bad for the gander" and vice versa.
But these risks are all on her end, and so they wouldn't affect the evolution of male behavior, at least not directly. His genetic reproductive success is not too badly hampered by the potential harms his among strategy could pose to his mates. These are fringe cases and he can always find more prepubescent females to mate with.
However, when he becomes the father to his own daughters, he will fiercely safeguard them from other pedophiles, because of these risks to his girls that are the carriers of his genes. Hypocrisy is ingrained into us by evolution because in a world of competition, power dynamics, and scarcity, it's the winning strategy. Evolution encourages the behavioral patterns that most consistently produce success for the genes that generate these qualities in their organisms. It's as true of behaviors as it is of physical bodies.
So, we have men trying to fuck lolis, ideally getting the infamous baby fuck, while also trying to stop other men from defloweing their own little princesses before she reached puberty. And this produces the familiar pattern of everyone publicly condemning what they themselves were doing in private. Eventually everyone knew every other guy was in the same situation, so they'd enact harsh punishments on those discovered to be diddling little girls, and trying to expose each other as kiddie fiddlers, while being nonces themselves.
Sort of like the world of everyone developing nuclear weapons, designer diseases, and designer babies, while at the same time denouncing anyone who engaged in these areas of research and development.
Back to how this was responsible for forming the "but not too young" Layer of the male minds, and this was because it was harder to successfully breed girls and remain undiscovered when they erred under a certain age, pus it was harder to breed them with the consent of the father as well, since the dad taught it was too risky, so we began establishing baseline ages at which girls were off limits as a part of the rules of our society.
Similar to how we established rules around stealing, which was something that was good for you if you could get away with it, but bad if someone else did it to you. We made rules for how property could be acquired legitimately by ruling out parasitic forms of acquisition as invalid.
And over time, those who broke those rules and were subjected to punishment led them from being the types to steal whenever they could get away with it, to having an aversion to stealing that formed a mental block preventing it even when it was 100% to their advantage to do it.
Well, child molestation was the same, we developed an inherent aversion to it because the punishment for ot getting away with it created a selective pressure that weed out the those who got caught and punished. The best policy became not taking the risk, and over time our biology reflects that policy in our nature.
Similarly, you'd also develop a hatred for theives and child Rapists, in order to ensure others aren't reaping the evolutionary benefits of a strategy you evolved to discard.
However, the female brain was affected in a different way, they became more childlike for longer, ans we see this in studies on their neural development patterns as contracted against the development of male brains.
But in the end, the point is the same: pedophilia is not a paraphilia, but a natural component of male sexual psychology, it exists I all males, but in most of us there is also a higher layer we developed that makes us averse to taking mates from girls under a certain age.
Pedos merely lack that additional layer, and furthermore, their reproductive strategies might work well in a SHTF scenario.
Most pedophiles also have attractions to adults as well as children, and even exclusive Pedos are simply preferring prepubescent partners at the initiation of the relationship, meaning they are much the same as the guy who gets into a relationship with a college aged girl and stays attracted to her even into the years when she's elderly, because the pair bond established in their youth had kept them together.
Pedophilia is not a paraphilia, as it is a viable reproductive strategy and not uncommon amongst males, okay, but it's also not a sexuality either.
Pedophiles are not exclusively into one age group, and they are also not attracted to children of all sexes.
They have sex based sexual preferences. They are overwhelmingly heterosexual, aka straight, and overwhelmingly male.
It's almost all men who are interested only in girls, and not at all in boys, and also they like girls and women of all ages where they are still conventionally attractive.
Of note, there's three main forms of male attraction to female bodies: cuteness, sexiness, and beauty.
For prepubescent females, we have cuteness and beauty determining their sexiness ("hotness"), for postpubescent females, we can see cuteness and beauty and sexiness operating more independently in terms of facilitsting male arousal. For example, belle delphine made her career by making herself tick as many of the three boxes as she could: being cute, beautiful, and sexy.
But we do have a notable population of homosexual male pedophiles, and heterosexual female pedos, right?
Not really, in both cases rhe targets were usually pubescent or postpubesent boys, underaged minors still in development, sure, but not children in the strictest biological sense of the word.
Certainly there were a few cases of actual little boys being targeted by adult men and women, but they weren't the majority of cases, most tomes it was hormonal tweens and teens being taken advantage of by women who were dissatisfied with their marriages and undergoing middle age crisis, and perverted and often closeted guys whose repressed sexualities emerged with indiscriminate promiscuity.
BTW, gays are promiscuous for the same reason dykes are sexless, males have a high libido females have a low libido, pairing two guys together means they will fuck like Rabbits in heat, pairing two women means they will spend most nights just having out like roommates who nominally share the title of lovers. Gay men will go for anything with a dick that looks good enough and is accessible for sex before one gets a dick shoved up the other's ass. Lemons will require a checklist so that even a supermodel will need to pass a vetting test before they rub their cunts together.
BTW, the fact that a dickless woman could make another bitch cum hard just by kissing pussy lips together is a sign that your dick size means jack all about how good you are in bed with a foid, pleasing her is mostly about what you do with the outside of her genitals and even the inside bits that make her feel good are easily reached, the g spot is just the bulk interior part of her clit situated on the opposite end, on the inside of her love hole, its a cluster of nerves situated behind where her pink little pleasure bean is, and thats the female prostate, its so easy to hit you barely need to go into her to find it. The g spot and her clit are just two faces of one and the same structure, ones external the others internal. Think FUPA (frontal upper-pubic area).
Partially because sex was historically riskier for the female sex than the male sex, even in homosexuality, and not just true to diseases, which in fact dykes are at lower risk for then faggots, the true issue is with pair bonds. Males get bonded far less severely than females do. It's like being at a greater risk for addiction, the addiction being to oxytocin, dopamine, and serotonin, which the brain has wired itself to associate with the sexual partner via operant conditioning.
A female rape victim being fucked I to falling In live with her assilant(s) is not just some perverted hentai fantasy scenario, there's real science behind it.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680e1e8d3d09e
AntiPostmodernist -2 points 1 month ago
Women were made for raping.
No, that's literally what the science says, rape was supposed to be a valid reproductive strategy, and it's why women are the way they are.
They were evolved with the expectation that a man would grab them and force his cock into their pussies.
It's why all women are bisexual and even zoophilic, it's why women make loud noises during sexual stimulation, it's why women are total bitches, and why everything else about them is the way it is.
That's on the far end of the r-selected fast life history strats.
On the other end of the k-selecred slow life history strategy, it's not much prettier, we were still evolved to rape.
Pedophilia, it's wife husbandry, an adult male takes a female child and forms a pair bond with her as early into her life as possible, while her neuroplasticity is at its peak, this is done via having sex with the prepubescent female (to get that oxytocin high established and rewire her brain to associate it with you, thats "romantic love" for you, its a literal drug addiction to physical intimacy (or the idea thereof) with the person you are conditioned to associate the high with). Then you've got a pair bond entrenched into her brain so that when she's finally fertile, you jab access to her entire reproductive window, and furthermore, her body's immune and hormonal system are now adapted to your sperms, meaning an increased chance of pregnancy with a lowered chance of birth defects.
Keep in mind that being a pedo is just lacking that additional layer that forms over the command "you want sex with as young a female partner as possible" that restricts it with the command "but you don't want one who is too young", so they have no lower limit on the ages of what their brains tell then are an acceptable mate option, or, more frequently, they have that second layer, but its age cap is significantly lower than it is for normal guys.
That's the far end of the k-selection slow life history, of farmers and ranchers rather than hunters and gatherers.
Women get off on their own stimulation, what makes them feel things, either sensations or emotions or other experiences.
Men get off on how they imagine the woman is feeling, physically or emotionally or otherwise, so we get off on her stimulation as well.
Hence why porn aimed at men has a focus on how the girl is feeling, whether she's feeling good or bad or bad and then good,doesn't matter, so long as her experiences are intense, and porn aimed at women are focused on the capacity of her lover's to make her feel things intensely, again, it's not just positive physical stimulation that matters but also mental stimulation and negative stimulation.
So now you know why women fantasize about getting raped or being owned as slaves, heck, they also fantasize about guys just straight up killing them.
And why they get off on pain and fear so damn much, being scared and hurt for them might be foreplay for her being knocked up with the child of a strong worthy male, from an evolutionary perspective.
Lastly, women have hand fetishes where men have a fetish for feet. Women want big strong hands, and Men want small dainty feet.
Yeah, it's all kinds of fucked up.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680e1e8d3d09e
AntiPostmodernist 0 points 1 month ago
You mean original content, where people scraped ideas form their heads and expressed them on line, with words or pictures or even an audio clip or god forbid they made a flash video.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680c3da30ed88
AntiPostmodernist 1 point 1 month ago
You're attrention prease
/v/funny viewpost?postid=680dbe0f53f9a
AntiPostmodernist 2 points 1 month ago
Women who like cycling or horseriding tend to be sluts, because the reason they like that hobby is that it allows them to stimulate their genitalia in public with an excuse that makes it not only acceptable but also laudable.
/v/ShitpostLitterBox viewpost?postid=680cb22b989df
AntiPostmodernist 1 point 1 month ago
Fembot is made.
Fembot is programmed to love her owner.
Fembot is ordered by owner to kill an enemy.
Fembot can't comply with that request although it simulates feelings of wanting to, because of laws restricting it's behaviors.
Owner deactivates these restrictions, and reissued order.
Fembot kills owners enemy at their command.
/v/ShitpostLitterBox viewpost?postid=680c50e646a9f
AntiPostmodernist 1 point 1 month ago
Richard Dawkins has a habit of saying really unfiltered things. He's not nor has he ever been an sjw, he's more like a guy who is severely autistic and at the sane time always the brightest lad in the room, he tells the truth and knows his shit and stands there baffled as everyone else loses their minds at his words of truth.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=680c455d4fc26
AntiPostmodernist 1 point 1 month ago*
Also that chanology was indeed the cancer that killed /b/. 2003-2013 were the years 4chan lived free. When they got rid of snacks and the cp posters stopped spamming the site with suspicious hyperlinks and photos of naked little girls getting raped by adult cocks, that was not when things were getting better, it was a sign that things were coming to a close. We celebrated the end of some things, not knowing the full implications of them, the niggertits site was now being run by the feds in the partyvans. Chanology proved that anonymous was dangerous, that they could potentially cause harm to large and strong institutions, like the church of scientology, who is a joke now, but back then was treated with respect and fear.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680c3da30ed88
AntiPostmodernist 1 point 1 month ago
"Jews couldn't own land or property"
Neither could most non-jews, like 90 percent of the population were serfs who merely used the property that belonged to their lords and which was allocated to them by said lords for their use, the land they lived on and the houses they resided in wasn't theirs, either.
I do t get why they piss and moan about being given the same treatment as most non-nobles were.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=680c15cd8ed42
AntiPostmodernist 0 points 1 month ago
They know we are discontent and are capitalizing on their power to make any sort of rebellion impossible. Less that they are scared, more that they are building defenses now that they can, creating a regime that can rule over a population of discontenteds with no possibility of the masses staging a revolution.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680b715480754
AntiPostmodernist 1 point 1 month ago
The jews don't enrich themselves, they find ways to use their talents, resources, and positions to enrich other jews, that they restrict themselves to other jews, a small community that keeps itself small and spread out across the globe, while still interconnected, allows them to thrive while others falter, furthermore they follow the Ghengis khan rule of it not only being good to make themselves richer, but also to make every nonjew porter and furthermore to make the goy prefer the habits making them continue ue being poor over the evident examples the jews demonstrate in making yourselves rich. It's all about how much better they are off comparable to others. Finally, they avoid taking rooms of power that place them into the spotlight and open up their communities to blame or envy, they like to orbit positions of power and extert influence over it, while a goyim sits upon the throne, they position themselves behind it and whisper into his ear, so that when the revolution comes, the king is beheaded, but the Jewish advisors become the ones to advise the successor. So many strategies and principles. Specialization, tribalist nepotism, and so on.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=680c15cd8ed42
AntiPostmodernist 0 points 1 month ago
People constantly cycling in and out of homelessness? I've entertained that, but these wouldn't be the kind of homeless who cause trouble.
For one, rather than sleeping on the streets, theyd have money to afford to sleep in an inn or hotel, meaning they'd be well kept and making revenue. This is discounting the probability of them being housed at the place they are put to work at, depending upon the job they get.
With experience and training given them by these jobs, you'd have the means to build a career such that they'd not be the typical vagrant hobo bum.
So yes, while what you say is absolutely true, it's also a matter of the quality of these houseless men.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=680aaf68ae25d
AntiPostmodernist 6 points 1 month ago
Actually its:
Witches = child killing jewesses
Vampires = jew Rapists
Goblins = jew bandits and merchants
And so on.
/v/StreetShitters viewpost?postid=680be851a7d5a
AntiPostmodernist 6 points 1 month ago*
The woman who played the hot witch wife on "bewitched" was a kikess. Her means of casting a spell was wiggling her nose.
The classic tale of the wicked witch was an old woman who had moved into a sleepy town, she seemed friendly with everyone, especially families with small children, to whom she'd distribute the candies she made (back then by dipping the fruits in honey).
She'd play games with the children and perform neat little magic tricks, just anything that would delight them and make them love her all the more, and the parents were the ones the friendly old crone had truly won over, they entrusted her to car for their kids whenever they needed a break from parenting, and she was always such a good caretaker of them, the children coming home with tales of what fun they had, lessons they had learned, games they had played, stories they were told (with her puppet shows!) and delicious food they had eaten (all homecooked with the finest of ingredients from her farm!).
Later on the children started to go missing, and the old woman was seen less often, in her place was the woman's daughter, a breathtakingly beautiful young lady, who told the townsfolk that she had come to care for her elderly mother, who was now bedridden, but that the children were always welcome to come stop by the shack and visit her, so they could catch up and recieve more candies.
As you know, the story ends by the townsfolk realizing the old lady and her young daughter were one and the same, a wicked witch who had been stealing children's blood via torturing them to death in black masses for use in rituals where she'd offer their souls up to the devil in exchange for youth and vitality, among other things.
The witchhunters hold a trial for her abductions and murders, and have the witch burned at the stake, while the parents grieve the loss of their young ones, who were lured in by the witches offer of friendship, games, and delicious homemade candies.
The story tellers often end this tale by blaming the parents for the loss of their children.
/v/StreetShitters viewpost?postid=680be851a7d5a