Sign into an existing account

I asked ChatGPT how many jews were in the holobunga camps when they were liberated using the number of survivors alive today as a reference point. Naturally I didn't state it like that. tl;dr, ChatGPT estimates there were 4.9 Million jews liberated from the camps. Here's the details:

Me:
An event happened 80 years ago. There are 245,000 people alive today that were participating in that event. How many people can we estimate to have participated in the original event 80 years ago? Include all ages. We can assume they are average Europeans for the purpose of life expectancy. Explain your answer including assumptions.

ChatGPT said:
To estimate the number of participants in the event that took place 80 years ago, we need to account for survival rates over time based on life expectancy. Since we assume the participants were average Europeans, we will use European life expectancy data to guide our calculations.

Step 1: Understanding Mortality Rates
The average life expectancy in Europe today is around 78–82 years.
Life expectancy in the early 20th century was lower, but for simplicity, we'll assume that at the time of the event, participants had a similar long-term survival pattern.
Mortality rates increase with age, so younger participants in the event would have had a better chance of surviving to today.
Step 2: Survival Rates by Age Group
We assume the participants in the event were a mix of ages, from infants to elderly individuals. Using life tables (mortality rates per age group), a rough estimate of survival rates to today (from 80 years ago) can be made:

Age in Event Survival Rate to Today (%)
0 (newborns) ~3%
10 years ~6%
20 years ~10%
30 years ~20%
40 years ~12%
50 years ~5%
60+ years ~1% or lower
The survival rates are lower for older participants at the time of the event, with most centenarians today having been very young at the time.

Step 3: Backward Estimation
If 245,000 people from the original event are still alive today, we work backward by estimating what percentage of participants survived.

A reasonable weighted average survival rate across all age groups would be around 5–10%, considering that a large portion of the original population consisted of young and middle-aged adults.

Using this assumption:

Original Participants
≈
Current Survivors
Survival Rate
Original Participants≈
Survival Rate
Current Survivors
​

Using a 7% survival rate as a reasonable midrange estimate:

245
,
000
0.07
≈
3.5
 million participants
0.07
245,000
​
≈3.5 million participants
Final Estimate
Thus, we estimate that about 3 to 4 million people originally participated in the event 80 years ago.

Key Assumptions
Participants were of average European life expectancy.
Survival rates are derived from historical and modern life tables.
A weighted average survival rate of 7% was used, balancing younger and older age groups.
The event had participants of all ages, but younger individuals were more likely to survive to today.
Would you like a more precise breakdown or alternative calculations?

Me:
5% survival rate for 50 year olds is unreasonable they would be 130 years old! Also 12% survival rate for 40 year olds is unreasonable. They would be 120 years old! Please reconsider your survival rate estimates.

ChatGPT said:
You're absolutely right—my initial survival rate estimates for older participants were too high. Let's refine the analysis with more realistic assumptions based on mortality data.

Revised Survival Rate Estimations
We will assume that:

Participants were of all ages, from infants to elderly.
European life expectancy trends apply.
Survival rates decline significantly with age.
A reasonable survival rate for different age groups at the time of the event (80 years ago):

Age in Event Survival Rate to Today (%) Current Age
0 (newborns) ~5–7% 80
10 years old ~10–15% 90
20 years old ~6–8% 100
30 years old ~2–3% 110
40 years old ~0.5% 120
50+ years old Effectively 0% 130+
People who were 50 or older at the event (now 130+) are essentially non-existent today.
Those who were 40 at the time (~120 today) have near-zero survival.
The vast majority of living participants today were likely children, teenagers, or young adults at the time.
Step 2: Backward Estimation
We now assume that 245,000 people alive today primarily come from age groups that had reasonable survival rates.

Weighted Average Survival Rate
Most of today's survivors were likely between 0–30 years old at the time. Let’s take an overall survival rate of ~5%, assuming that:

Children (0–10) had the highest survival (7–10%).
Young adults (20s) had moderate survival (6–8%).
Older adults (30+) had much lower survival (~2% or less).
Revised Calculation
Original Participants
≈
Current Survivors
Survival Rate
Original Participants≈
Survival Rate
Current Survivors
​

Using an overall survival rate of 5%:

245
,
000
0.05
=
4.9
 million participants
0.05
245,000
​
=4.9 million participants
Final Estimate
We estimate that around 4.5 to 5.5 million people originally participated in the event.

This range is based on:

Realistic survival rates considering age at the time.
The fact that most of today's survivors were young at the time.
A weighted survival rate of ~5%.
Would you like further refinements or considerations?

mRNA has been an exciting topic for decades. Scientists have been tinkering with it trying to make it work in humans for a long time. The potential is limitless. If mRNA can be mastered, then we could usher in a whole new era of medicine. It is very easy to design mRNA. Ugur Sahin, the founder of BioNTech, bragged that he designed the covid jab in a [single day.](https://www.businessinsider.com/pfizer-biontech-vaccine-designed-in-hours-one-weekend-2020-12) [Archive](https://archive.is/keXTC)

mRNA could be used to do nearly anything. Vaccines for the common cold. Self-produced insulin for diabetics. [Cure lactose intolerance.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3FcbFqSoQY). Cure the [s]faggot disease[/s] AIDS. Modify troons to produce their own castration pills. The possibilities are endless.

So where are these miracle cures? We have a product that has been out for over 4 years now. If the covid jab is so safe and effective, we should be seeing an explosion in mRNA products. Where are they? Next time someone tells you they're getting their jab, remind them that they haven't used this miracle technology to cure aids.

Got it for a good price. It's a lot of books. It's the perfect year. No mention of the holocaust. I'll take requests to snap a pictures of a few entries.

I went to an estate sale and found an Encyclopedia set. I glanced at it but couldn't find the date. It wasn't in the first few pages like it commonly is for other books. The people running the sale were charging $200 for the whole set, but if it survives today it'll be $100 tomorrow and I can probably haggle $20 off that.

We all know these things are rewritten to change the current narrative and I am interested in picking this up. What should I look for to peg the date? Aside from the obvious Holocaust, what other notable entries should I check up on? For the right price I might resell it.

We should cancel gravity

Y'all are fucking slacking.

Don't post the details here. Make a new thread for them. Would appreciate a link/ping though.

Source: https://archive.is/mhjjC

Local grocery store was offering a deal on beef tenderloin. It's a big chain. I've gotten tenderloin from this chain many times before. I have processed dozens of tenderloins to turn them into steak and stew meat without issue. One of my pleasures in life is to enjoy some delicious steak tartare with the trimmings.

When I opened this package, there was a very strong smell of shit. I wasn't sure what to do. There was no obvious signs of spoilage. The meat had a good texture and looked fine. I thought maybe they just botched the slaughter of the animal and it wouldn't be a problem after cooking. I tried rinsing the tenderloin with water to clean any contamination that may have been on the outside and went ahead. By this point I had developed a tolerance to the smell and kept on going as normal. I decided not to have tartare and just cook up a steak instead. I put a good sear on it, and, erring on the side of caution, cooked it to medium rare.

One bite. I did what I could to mitigate contamination, to mitigate risk. I thought it was just on the side where the silverskin was, and obviously I removed the silverskin. But after cooking it, I could TASTE it. Gross. I took it back and got my money back for the whole tenderloin, but I'm rather disappointed. I was looking forward to some steak tartare.

I've done this dozen of times. I've never had a tenderloin like this. Lately when I opened 2 other roasts I noticed a strong smell of sulfur, but otherwise they ended up tasting fine. Anyone have an idea what might have gone wrong with the meat? How might avoid this in the future? Is this a growing problem with supermarket meat?