×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate


happytoes
Member for: 4.2 years

scp: 743 (+776/-33)
ccp: 323 (+336/-13)
votes given: 2440 (+2393/-47)
score: 1066





Trophies

Owner of:
mathematics,
Mod of:

Good catch. It looks genuine when I find it on the [Zambian Observer](https://zambianobserver.com/limpopo-beneficiaries-braai-30-cows-awarded-to-them-to-start-farming-project/).

It is only the unclickable link at the bottom to [newsvine](https://newsvine.co.za/limpopo-beneficiaries-eat-30-cows-awarded-to-them-to-start-farming-project/) that gives the game away.

It is hard to suspect that this is satire, given the [history](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Cape_Colony_from_1806_to_1870#Xhosa_cattle-killing_movement_and_famine_(1854%E2%80%931858%29)

> When she returned, she told her uncle Mhlakaza that she had met three spirits at the bushes, and that they had told her that all cattle should be slaughtered, and their crops destroyed. On the day following the destruction, the dead Xhosa would return and help expel the whites. The ancestors would bring cattle with them to replace those killed.[3] Mhlakaza believed the prophecy, and repeated it to the chief Sarhili.


/v/NiggerCulture viewpost?postid=683fd41d589e8

Nothing that needs saying can be said briefly.

For example, you read "Nothing that needs saying can be said briefly." and take away the idea that "Nothing important can be said briefly.". Whoops! Brevity has let the important point get lost.

There is a trick to saying important things in just a few words: *jargon*! It doesn't have to be jaw breakingly polysyllabic. One can achieve compression of meaning with a homely word or phrase, set in a context that evokes its special meaning. Economists do this with *comparative advantage* and also with *public goods*.

Some of your readers will understand; others will not. Who understands? Those who have studied the matter already. And in the course of their study they have already understood the important point. So yes, it was important, but no, it didn't need saying; they already knew. As for the others, since it is important, it does need saying; but how? It will have to be said at length, telling the stories behind the special phrases such as *comparative advantage* and *public goods*, because the true meaning resides in the long stories.




/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=682860eb89b71

https://xcancel.com/kanyewest/status/1920387087049572704


/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=681ff16ae92e6

Are we going to get a forecast?


/v/conspiracy viewpost?postid=680de4449c08c

> Rosheisen got the cat three years ago to help lower his blood pressure. He tried to train him to call 911, unsure if the training ever stuck.

> The phone in the living room is always on the floor, and there are 12 small buttons — including a speed dial for 911 right above the button for the speaker phone.

So the cat only had to mash the buttons until he hit the speed dial for 911, and had already had lessons to encourage that. Still impressive, but the actual story it weak enough that it might be true :-)


/v/Interesting viewpost?postid=680cad5f8f1e8

After the Carrington-Event/EMP he will get his backup PC and his generator out of the Faraday cage in the survival bunker and be able to watch the X-files because he has the physical medium.


/v/Meirl viewpost?postid=67f73d788d670

I was feral-toes on Voat.co

After tragedy struck, I wasn't sure how accounts carried over to the revived Voat and made a new account with a slightly different name for fear that a clash might complicate things. Having feral toes is the fault of [this internet cult](https://www.barefooters.org/). Being barefoot does keep my toes happy:-)


/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=67f70bf92c342

Peter Ridd has an interesting YouTube channel, for example

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MUuJ1sAmA0

I thought that the lapse rate (air is colder at higher altitudes) was due to gravity, but Peter Ridd goes into the details of radiative transfer within the atmosphere. The easy to calculate bit (no convection, no weather) leads one to expect a huge green house effect. The hard to calculate bit (with convection and weather) is pretty much too hard to calculate, but it is what we experience and currently live with. More carbon dioxide probably means more convection, taking heat higher into the atmosphere, but only modest increases in surface temperatures.

That is a little disappointing. I live in Scotland and would welcome a ten degree centigrade increase in surface temperatures. As it is, I once again face enduring the bitter cold of the Scottish summer.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67e41a2eaf79e

Your link has England on 10.9 liters per year, and Ireland of 0.07 liters per year.

England drinks one hundred and forty times as much alcohol as Ireland? Maybe in the future when Ireland embraces Wahhabi Islam :-)


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67d831e4dea07

Broken for me.

> Something went wrong. Try reloading


/v/MeanwhileOnTwitter viewpost?postid=67cf7d11964c4

I don't like number five: Honour thy father and thy mother

It skips lightly over whether the parents are setting a good example or a bad example. And why give commandments to children? They have parents to knock some sense into them. It makes more sense to tell the parents to set a good example, so that their children will honour them naturally. It is the parents who have the autonomy and need instructions from God.


/v/Christcucks viewpost?postid=67ca1303d3d2d

I cannot go outside because I'm only a NPC :-(


/v/SimulationTheory viewpost?postid=67c3ef0f570bc

What about the [Gods of the copybook headings](https://www.kiplingsociety.co.uk/poem/poems_copybook.htm)?

The mechanistic reductionist materialism underpinning atheism is in trouble because it turns out that atoms are too small. Engineers design heat engines using pressure, temperature, and entropy. Sure, there are molecules rushing about, bumping into pistons and each other, but there are too many to count, too many to design with.

We want to know *why* "the burnt Fool's bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire;". In theory molecular biology tells us the answer; in practice, no, that doesn't help at all.


/v/Atheism viewpost?postid=67b6a8e0dc502

The original usury video is gone from YouTube, but https://rumble.com/v66o1rm-usury-and-the-one-group-exploiting-it-matt-kim-131.html
seems to be it.


/v/videos viewpost?postid=67af09e6aa063

I knew that two wires, running side by side, would attract each other if the current ran in the same direction in both. And now there are lots of videos [1](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GW7PvSR9VUo) [2](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubOTTPD1GL0) [3](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43AeuDvWc0k)

But it never occurred to me that the same applies when the "wire" is just ionized air, and that this leads to plasma from electrical discharges running in channels.

That said, the Plasma Cannon is a bit like a wrong way round [TOW ATGM](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wire-guided_missile). Each Plasma Cannon shot starts with a fine wire to guide the lightening strike to the target. The wire gets vaporized (good for one Amp, but carrying thirty thousand Amps) and I'm guessing that it is the metal from the wire burning that gives the shower of sparks along the line of the plasma channel.


/v/science viewpost?postid=67a3b3769be4e

But only on a small scale, say two adults and three children.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67a0302443f24

The article was unusually explicit

> The General Secretary of the Communist Party stressed in October that nearly 70% of the state budget is spent on salaries and administrative expenses, leaving little room for essential investments in infrastructure and development.

which makes me think that real change is happening :-)


/v/WorldNews viewpost?postid=679190f34a302

If you get stabbed, you will bleed out quickly, no painful lingering :-)


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67901d2036f84

When I clicked, I thought it was going to be the [famous sculpture by Henri Gaudier-Brzeska](https://www.nationalgalleries.org/art-and-artists/289) but this is much better :-)


/v/TellUpgoat viewpost?postid=678c3c273c29b

American housing is built with firewood and hot melt glue. I didn't realise that there were 496 hammers in America.


/v/TellUpgoat viewpost?postid=678bd7ce8f3f9

I live in Scotland; saved from hypothermia by sin!


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=678bea60bf721

My guess is Greece. There are a lot of ancient ruins, a lot of tourists to take videos, and I remember seeing some lizards when I was a tourist myself.


/v/Reptiles viewpost?postid=6789dcedea83d

I liked the way he built up the formula, first one point, then two, then three, then the general case. I coded along at home, writing some Common Lisp, structured the same way

https://pastebin.com/GY1YZUGz

In the last five minutes Elliot Nicholson warns that Lagrange Interpolation sometimes wiggles weirdly in between the given points. That is the Runge Spikes thing that I'm interested in.

I thought that I could generate a simple example by running my code. Let the points be (0,0), (1,0), (2,1), (3,0), (4,0). I'm expecting wiggles at the half-integer points.

CL-USER> (funcall (make-poly '((0 . 0)(1 . 0)(2 . 1)(3 . 0)(4 . 0))) 2.5) => 0.703125

That is reasonable

CL-USER> (funcall (make-poly '((0 . 0)(1 . 0)(2 . 1)(3 . 0)(4 . 0))) 3.5) => -0.546875

That little dip is odd, but not too weird.

But if I try interpolating 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

CL-USER> (funcall (make-poly '((0 . 0)(1 . 0)(2 . 0)(3 . 0)(4 . 0)
(5 . 1)
(6 . 0)(7 . 0)(8 . 0)(9 . 0)(10 . 0)
)) 0.5)

=> 4.9335175

I get a weird answer at one half. Yah! My first Runge Spike!


/v/mathematics viewpost?postid=678033959e4c3

Yes if you are [Ernst Röhm](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%B6hm_scandal)


/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=677f586d0d0c3

[Raising of Chicago](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raising_of_Chicago)

Highlights from the article

> During the 1850s and 1860s, engineers carried out a piecemeal raising of the grade of central Chicago to lift the city out of its low-lying swampy ground. Buildings and sidewalks were physically raised on jackscrews.

> In January 1858, the first masonry building in Chicago to be thus raised—a four-story, 70-foot-long (21 m), 750-ton (680 metric tons) brick structure situated at the north-east corner of Randolph Street and Dearborn Street—was lifted on two hundred jackscrews to its new grade, which was 6 feet 2 inches (1.88 m) higher than the old one, “without the slightest injury to the building.”

More "late nineteenth century" engineering that "shithole" engineering.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=677b86a4ab785