Sign into an existing account

Instead of blocking, can i mark users as something? Like a "shill" or something? Only the marking user would see it. This mark would be written after username.

You can search by page title, but sometimes people rename things and we get duplicate article posting.

https://files.catbox.moe/m8c7rv.png
Brave on android mobile

Notice after a particular post the upgoats get fuzzed.

I tried reproducing the effect by posting an identically formatted post but that seemed to FIX the issue. Then I deleted my test post and the problem reappeared.

Weird

Update: after more posts appeared, the issue vanished

1.) Comment replies that were deleted still show their contents in your inbox. This is not true for submission replies though.

2.) The copyright year in the footer still says 2023.

@System
I believe it started recently, maybe 1 week.
There some links of Twitter / nitter videos that I click > redirect > watch the video > close the video > now.. Upon swiping back to voat, it does not come back. It stays in that Twitter post, even refreshing the page.
Even if I manually type voat.xyz and press "enter"
I have to force close safari and open again (and log in again).
Not sure if this is a bug in iPhone ios or Talk/voat.
That is why I decided to post. Just in case.
If it's not related, just ignore it.
Thanks and have a nice day

That's me talking about the cuban type of sandwich I ate today in this anon post. I choose to leave anon off in the anon subs. I was surprised that when responding from my inbox, I respond anonymously despite the "anon off" choice. No big deal for me, but I'm not sure if that's how you wanted it to work; thought I'd bring it up.

Thanks

Listen, I'm all for free speech. However, some users use the chat as their shitbox. I'm talking about folks who make it difficult to discuss anything other than "you're a faggot" or "no you're a faggot" because the log is filled with people just insulting each other all day.

How about a system where a user can be temporarily muted, and the method would be votes cast by regular "active" chat users, based on a participation score for each user. A minimum number of votes must be cast, such as 4 or whatever, and the offending user gets a notification. A progressive cooldown timer will be set, which increases exponentially every time that user gets voted off the island (up to a maximum of like a day or whatever).

This way, there are no assigned moderators to abuse mod powers, the quality of conversation will increase, and the world will be a little bit cleaner without 12-hour binges of "you're a fink" "no you're the fink".

I like the realtime interaction with other goats, but it gets very tiring every time you look at the chat and it's nothing but people throwing insults back and forth.

Maybe instead of muting them, they can be "redirected" into the "naughty corner" filled with the people who have been cast out of the main chat.

Hiding a user from the chat is there, but that still leaves a room full of crap for everyone else, and meessages get lost in the sea of "dur hur", so it doesn't really address the problem with messages being lost between people who just want to talk and not sling shit all day.

@system

I have been notified the the ownership of v/Christianity is in the hands of big_fat_dangus with myself and UncleDoug as mods.
I have no idea how or how long this has been the case but I thought it worth mentioning :)

Maybe I'm approaching the boomer mindset, or maybe it's just late and I'm tired, but with all this AI art being awesome af, I think voat needs an AI tag like it has NSFW and Gore tags. For a split second, I thought this was real.

It was very convenient especially when we have many cross posts from different platforms.

You don't want users to build "Nigger" towers using thumbs?