I was explaining how Shariah law was incompatible with White nations. Their only answer was that to prove God's kindness, my only choice is to sit there, and wait to get killed, so i can show the love of Jesus to others. I tried explaining there wont be any Christianity to spread if all those Christians are dead. Instead I was told that the only way to stop this is to placate and enable muslims, giving them the religious tolerance they need to practice. See Jesus is coming back soon, and since well all be dead soon, who gives a shit? (paraphrasing their words, not mine). As far as they're concerned, even bringing it up is too much. But if those same ass fucks criticize us? Well the onus is now on me to show the kindness of Christ by placating them. So let me get this straight, all i can do is sit there and get fucked by islam, whilst those same assholes can force demands on me and i have to listen? They can kill me, my family, and my entire neighborhood. But if i bring it up, im the bad guy?
Modern "Christianity" as taught and practiced by 99%+ of the Churches on earth is not in agreement with the New Testament.
Biblical Christianity is not an organization, though it expects organizations to arise among it's followers, it teaches that we are our own priests and we don't need anyone but God, through faith in His Son and the guidance of his Holy Spirit, to find truth and salvation.
This limp-wristed false Christianity that teaches the one commandment of "be nice" is like a giant cult that super over-emphasizes "love they neighbor and pray for your enemies" into the WHOLE message in a super feminine way that literally emasculates it's followers. And it's so much easier to refuse to fight and blame your laziness and cowardice on a command from God, than to represent the very divisive person of Jesus of Nazareth accurately to a world that hates Him.
No, the scriptures say there is a time to hate and a time to kill, not just a time love and a time to heal. And yes the new testament agrees. With Jesus Himself not only showing an example of righteous violence but directly declaring in His own words His condemnation of people and hatred of their deeds.
Now it's true that there is a lot of tolerance taught in the Bible but it's more toward being self-sacrificing and not at all about tolerating evil like most "churches" today de facto teach. The whole first part of revelation is Jesus telling groups of believers what they're doing wrong and tolerating evil is his most prominent criticism and in one of the few rare times He actually praises something about a Church it's because of their intolerance of evil. (Rev 2:6)
So if you wonder why it keeps coming back to Jesus when you're trying to really get to the ultimate truth, but then you go look into it and all you see is fake or extremely watered down Christianity, of course it's going to look like stupid bullshit, because that's exactly what "they" set out to do, subvert it.
1point21jiggawatts 5 points 5 hours ago
Modern "Christianity" as taught and practiced by 99%+ of the Churches on earth is not in agreement with the New Testament.
Biblical Christianity is not an organization, though it expects organizations to arise among it's followers, it teaches that we are our own priests and we don't need anyone but God, through faith in His Son and the guidance of his Holy Spirit, to find truth and salvation.
This limp-wristed false Christianity that teaches the one commandment of "be nice" is like a giant cult that super over-emphasizes "love they neighbor and pray for your enemies" into the WHOLE message in a super feminine way that literally emasculates it's followers. And it's so much easier to refuse to fight and blame your laziness and cowardice on a command from God, than to represent the very divisive person of Jesus of Nazareth accurately to a world that hates Him.
No, the scriptures say there is a time to hate and a time to kill, not just a time love and a time to heal. And yes the new testament agrees. With Jesus Himself not only showing an example of righteous violence but directly declaring in His own words His condemnation of people and hatred of their deeds.
Now it's true that there is a lot of tolerance taught in the Bible but it's more toward being self-sacrificing and not at all about tolerating evil like most "churches" today de facto teach. The whole first part of revelation is Jesus telling groups of believers what they're doing wrong and tolerating evil is his most prominent criticism and in one of the few rare times He actually praises something about a Church it's because of their intolerance of evil. (Rev 2:6)
So if you wonder why it keeps coming back to Jesus when you're trying to really get to the ultimate truth, but then you go look into it and all you see is fake or extremely watered down Christianity, of course it's going to look like stupid bullshit, because that's exactly what "they" set out to do, subvert it.