Sign into an existing account

this is demonstrably false, and physics are happy to show you why. remember physics are rules expressed by what has been observed. the vacuum is irrespective as laws of matter still apply, though they are observed differently. the video cited here observes a parallel of physics wherein equal and opposite forces occur. a pressure vessel can hold x amount of pressure. in the case of the soda can the pressure has equalized wherein thru mitigation of the material (aluminum can and co2) has equaled the pressure enacted by the atmosphere. when the vacuum occurs, the pressure on the inside of the vessel becomes greater than the pressure forcing it inward (atmospheric pressure) and thus structurally the aluminum gives way.

you can do the same thing by smashing a soda can with a hammer, or shooting it with a gun. the internal pressure once the vessel is ruptured is greater at that point than the pressure enacted by atmospheric forces, which is why it "explodes" outward. there's some kinetic energy in that equation as well, but the principals remain.

</physics>

https://youtube.com/watch?v=T8MOoUuLnug

Not all the tests. Most of the tests showed it probably does work, which is why it kept getting more tests. The so-called definative test, showed that EmDrive doesn't use propellant so therefore it doesn't follow the propellent rules of newtonian mechanics, which requires mass exchange between particles with actual mass- the fucking morons. They are correct. It doesn't use propellant with mass. The same morons are fine with massless particle momentum exchange propulsion from an external source such as solar sails. But the fucktards balk at the idea of a massless particle momentum exchange propulsion from an internal source such as a microwave generator.