☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
5

"Is it time to completely remove Anon-posting?" is the most Jewish thread title I have ever seen on any incarnation of Voat

submitted by GloryBeckons to whatever 3.9 yearsAug 10, 2021 22:35:44 ago (+14/-9)     (whatever)*

https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=6112ec79a1166

Kiked rhetoric on par with the likes of "Is it time for common sense gun control?" and "Let's talk about [insert kike agenda]!". Would fit right in as a headline in the Jew York Times.

-------------

As for the arguments:

The community is what makes this, or any, site.

Again, kiked rhetoric. Nothing but empty platitudes and pathos: Won't anyone think of the community?!

Content is what matters. Not names. Purely anonymous 8chan /pol/ was so effective as rustling heeb jimmies that they dailystormer'd it right off the internet. It had plenty of "community", too. Just no name fagging or internet point collecting.

 Bad actors don't invade to gain points, they invade to poison the community.

They can do that just as well with named burner accounts. Being anonymous, and not having points, provides absolutely zero advantage.

We're already anonymous through our usernames, which are pseudonyms.

If this was true, and it was exactly the same, then you wouldn't care.

Usernames make it easy to data mine for correlations, which can be used to identify people.

If I was a government agent, tasked with monitoring this place, I would really hate anon posting. I might even make a thread suggesting "it's time" to get rid of it.

 What we call 'anon' posting is simply posting without context.

What you call "without context" is simply that you can't just completely ignore the point someone is making, and try to discredit and distract from the topic they raise, by using red herring tactics like "yeah, but what about this completely unrelated thing you said two years ago?" or "X day/week/month old account hurr da durr".

The only innate 'defense' against anon is that points aren't saved. By contrast, context provides a complete defense when pseudonyms are used.

Or you could, you know, actually address the point being made and explain why it is wrong.

 The current anti-anon defense is meaningless. Given that a loss of points are the only sign of burning the defensive resources of the community, it means that the community's defenses are burned for free when defending in anon threads.

???

With anon, only system can defend us

And what, exactly, are you going to do to "defend us" against a named account that tries to "poison the community"? Brigade them? Downvote spam? Only the admins can ban. That is true whether the account is named or not.

Notice: Not a single coherent argument for how or why anon posts are actually causing a real problem, or what a supposed shill or other bogeyman could do with an anon post that they cannot do with a burner account.

Just a bunch of pathos and fear mongering over nothing.


17 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] boogienight 4 points 3.9 yearsAug 11, 2021 00:51:31 ago (+4/-0)

Bitter redditors trying to move their mod behavior here. The subverters understand that when you know the user names, you can block an anon post and see if that username isn't reachable, but a user who theoretically only posted to anon would be perpetually undiscoverable by them since they don't control the backend of the site, so they lobby with their fake accounts to take down anon through dubious reasons. Very glowie, very obvious, they're used to manipulating facebook posts and redditors, they don't know the company they keep here are hardened mentally to their bullshit. More than hardened, this community has immunity to bullshit. Lets just be amused as they continue to waste their time.

[ - ] Shotinthedark 2 points 3.9 yearsAug 11, 2021 02:34:45 ago (+2/-0)

I think you may be glowing a bit buddy

[ - ] Lordbananafist 2 points 3.9 yearsAug 10, 2021 22:46:11 ago (+2/-0)

We need better sexier fed posting

[ - ] MasterAce 1 point 3.9 yearsAug 11, 2021 02:38:24 ago (+1/-0)

They know not what they do.

[ - ] AloisH 1 point 3.9 yearsAug 11, 2021 00:52:11 ago (+1/-0)

You get an upvoat for using pathos

[ - ] Mr7Slug 1 point 3.9 yearsAug 10, 2021 22:39:14 ago (+5/-4)

I dont think we want your kind here. Thats really what it all boils down to. This is no jews allowed zone. If you wanna anon post with no accountability to a pseudonym, why dont you just go to the chans?

You wont be missed.

[ - ] GloryBeckons [op] 1 point 3.9 yearsAug 10, 2021 22:44:53 ago (+4/-3)

I have never posted anon on Voat. But nice try. Go fuck yourself, too.

Notice: Again, not a single actual argument. Just "we don't like it" and vapid rhetoric. Why don't you like it, and who is this "we" you speak of?

[ - ] Mr7Slug 2 points 3.9 yearsAug 10, 2021 22:47:05 ago (+2/-0)

Its already been talked about in the thread that matters.

Your post is literally just you personally disagreeing, not actually MAKING points.

Sure you havent, you probably personally posted faggot porn and just dont want to havenit associated with your account you use to slime in and influence people.

[ - ] GloryBeckons [op] -2 points 3.9 yearsAug 10, 2021 22:53:38 ago (+1/-3)

System could verify, if he was so inclined. I even welcome him to unmask every comment I ever made in anon posts.

Again, nothing that couldn't be done with burner accounts. Any sort of bogeyman worth worrying about would be smart enough to make a whole bunch of them.

I made plenty of points. You just didn't take the time to read them, or to respond to any of them. You're just distracting from the topic with baseless accusations. Hm... Who do we know, that likes using that tactic?

[ - ] Mr7Slug 1 point 3.9 yearsAug 10, 2021 22:59:51 ago (+1/-0)

Oh so burner accounts work just fine then? Got it, thanka for proving there is no point for anon subs but to be a lazy faggot kikeposter

[ - ] boogienight 0 points 3.9 yearsAug 11, 2021 00:48:11 ago (+0/-0)

Just pack it up and leave faggot.

[ - ] Mr7Slug 0 points 3.9 yearsAug 10, 2021 23:11:37 ago (+2/-2)

Why a new thread about it? Why not make your comment in the thread where everyone got together and talked about it already? Trying to get a tainted result when all your jew friends log in, after everyone else already had the conversation and left? None of your points are points, its just you being a retard and misleading the lesser minded among us.

You trying to just suck the effort out of people? Why not go reply to their comments in that thread directly instead of making your own post about it after the fact?

Did you look at it, and see the MASSIVE consensus among the vast majority of people that the anon subs are trash and yall are faggots? Chicken shit faggot cant address the actual points that were made with the actual people that made them?

Id go over your bullshit retard list, but nah, the other thread, the one that matters, not your faggot thread here, has plenty of explanation in it, and counterpoints, and counterpoints to the counterpoints.

So why make a new thread that ignores all that?

Again, is it because your kike buddies are online now? Because you fuckin retards got btfo in the other thread?

Lost that battle over there so your smarmy little ass scurries around summoning the best and brightest of isntreals online fagsquad?

Ill waste my time flaming your obvious bullshittery, but i dont recommend anyone waste their time explaining to you what was thoroughly explained already, in the other thread. You wanna have this conversation about the anon subs legit, go comment in the other thread and talk to the people younl disagree with directly instead of fag-posting.


Also, "waaaah 2 downvotes in 30 seconds!" Go to poal you sensitive little fruit. "Waaaag downvotes arnt disagreement, its censorship!" Just fuck right off with that tired old bullshit and take your worthless fuckin scummy ass the fuck to poal where everyone is just as faggy as you.

[ - ] GloryBeckons [op] -2 points 3.9 yearsAug 11, 2021 00:00:17 ago (+1/-3)

That's a whole lotta nothing you have there, buddy.

All of the arguments in your precious other thread revolve around "defending" Voat from the dreaded bogeymen.

So answer the simple question: What can the dreaded bogeymen do with anon posts, that they cannot do with burners?

[ - ] GloryBeckons [op] 0 points 3.9 yearsAug 10, 2021 22:37:33 ago (+4/-4)*

Two downvotes within 30 seconds of posting. Three by 2 minutes. Nice! That's a record for me.

Downvotes don't express disagreement. Downvotes bury content. Make it so less people see it.

Why would someone want to bury this topic and the points it makes?

[ - ] Mr7Slug 3 points 3.9 yearsAug 10, 2021 22:43:03 ago (+5/-2)

Sounds like you should go to poal, faggot.

[ - ] AndrewBlazeIt 1 point 3.9 yearsAug 10, 2021 23:03:00 ago (+3/-2)

Downvotes don't do shit if you browse voat in /all/new like a real guy

[ - ] AndrewBlazeIt -2 points 3.9 yearsAug 10, 2021 22:37:15 ago (+3/-5)

Wow, you really haven't been around very long, then