Found an abandoned subverse that you'd like to Own? Any subs owned by 'MrGoat' or those that have no Owner at all are available for transfer.
To make a request, just submit a Share Link Post linking to the subverse you want and make your title: "Requesting v/SubNameHere"
Requirements 1. 50 CCP required 2. 30-day account age required 3. Only one pending subverse transfer per user at a time 4. Can't request a sub on behalf of another user 5. Must have activity in sub — minimum 2 posts and 2 comments in the last 30 days; if content appears to be submitted just to meet this requirement, request will be denied. 6. A user may not own more than 10 subs, so check your sub ownership count before you make your request
A. Requests for v/all will be denied; this is a catch-all 'Default' sub and you can't have it B. Requests to Mod any 'Default' sub owned by system coming soon so don't ask yet
Requirements 1. GREATER THAN 50 CCP required 2. 30-day or greater account age, required 3. Only one pending subverse transfer per user at a time 4. Can't request a sub on behalf of another user 5. Must have activity in sub — minimum 2 posts and 2 comments in the last 30 days; if content appears to be submitted just to meet this requirement, request will be denied. 6. A user may not own more than 10 subs, so check your sub ownership count before you make your request
A. Requests for v/all will be denied; this is a catch-all 'Default' sub and you can't have it B. Requests to Mod any 'Default' sub owned by system coming soon so don't ask yet
They paid leftist disenchanters just want to create DRAMA subverses to ruin this web site with upvoted garbage and gibberish.
FatPeopleHate will add nothing constructive and any dissenting science posts within it will get the poster banned improperly from the subverse without cause.
FatPeopleHate JUST NOW created rules allowing them to BAN PEOPLE for using science on their subverse and updated their long list of censorship rules.
The user-banning subverses like FatPeopleHate and others will be the worst that thing to help destroy this site in ages.
You need requirement #7, and #8 :
7. Mods cannot ban voat members from subverse without valid cause of harming the subverse
8. Sites that allow brigading posts telling the posse whom to attack next should automatically cause unbanning of any banned target.
Even old voat.co forced dozens of people banned for typing "nigger" in Q subverse to be unbanned.
50ccp is not unreasonable, we are still a young site. As we grow, this and maybe some other requirements will be added.
FPH is free to create any rules it wishes, all sub owners are free to do this. It's how it was at old voat and how it is at many other sites. You are even free to create a sub and institute your own rules, I've done it too, many goats have! So your "rule 7" isn't something that we're interested in right now but appreciate the suggestion. In fact, there's a few subs that like to ban people just for fun -- if you don't participate in those subs, you are at no risk for getting banned.
As for your "rule 8", it doesn't really pertain to requesting a new sub; you might consider making a post to v/IdeasForVoat for both of the rules that you've proposed.
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 0 points 3.2 yearsFeb 1, 2022 19:01:32 ago (+0/-0)
1. GREATER THAN 50 CCP required
2. 30-day or greater account age, required
3. Only one pending subverse transfer per user at a time
4. Can't request a sub on behalf of another user
5. Must have activity in sub — minimum 2 posts and 2 comments in the last 30 days; if content appears to be submitted just to meet this requirement, request will be denied.
6. A user may not own more than 10 subs, so check your sub ownership count before you make your request
A. Requests for v/all will be denied; this is a catch-all 'Default' sub and you can't have it
B. Requests to Mod any 'Default' sub owned by system coming soon so don't ask yet
updated 2022-02-01
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 25, 2021 18:45:40 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Cynabuns
[ - ] Cynabuns [op] 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 25, 2021 18:48:05 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] try
[ - ] try -2 points 3.7 yearsAug 25, 2021 21:18:46 ago (+0/-2)*
They paid leftist disenchanters just want to create DRAMA subverses to ruin this web site with upvoted garbage and gibberish.
FatPeopleHate will add nothing constructive and any dissenting science posts within it will get the poster banned improperly from the subverse without cause.
FatPeopleHate JUST NOW created rules allowing them to BAN PEOPLE for using science on their subverse and updated their long list of censorship rules.
The user-banning subverses like FatPeopleHate and others will be the worst that thing to help destroy this site in ages.
You need requirement #7, and #8 :
7. Mods cannot ban voat members from subverse without valid cause of harming the subverse
8. Sites that allow brigading posts telling the posse whom to attack next should automatically cause unbanning of any banned target.
Even old voat.co forced dozens of people banned for typing "nigger" in Q subverse to be unbanned.
old voat.co believed in free speech
[ + ] Cynabuns
[ - ] Cynabuns [op] 2 points 3.7 yearsAug 26, 2021 13:52:59 ago (+2/-0)
FPH is free to create any rules it wishes, all sub owners are free to do this. It's how it was at old voat and how it is at many other sites. You are even free to create a sub and institute your own rules, I've done it too, many goats have! So your "rule 7" isn't something that we're interested in right now but appreciate the suggestion. In fact, there's a few subs that like to ban people just for fun -- if you don't participate in those subs, you are at no risk for getting banned.
As for your "rule 8", it doesn't really pertain to requesting a new sub; you might consider making a post to v/IdeasForVoat for both of the rules that you've proposed.
Thanks for chiming in on the thread, u/try :)