Sign into an existing account

This is the faulty thinking that got us here in the first place. Tolerate tolerate tolerate. Tolerate unlimited amounts of deviance until the deviants take over and then common decency is outlawed as HATE.

How is that drawing of a naked child wewring makeup not CP? How realistic does it need to be? Why even play with that fire?

deleted

Understood. I think i'll delete this post in a couple of hours so this wont be on the front page. Thoughts?

The recent behavior seems gabaraish but he isn't the only shitlord around here. bm4a historically from what i recall has not acted like such a faggot before.

@system is being an absolute faggot retard about this issue, as the content bluemen is posting does violate the rules of the site. Illustrated porn is still porn, even if some kike worshiping hipster douchebag painted it and (((the art community))) calls it "art". The solution is simple and obvious: gas @bluemen4alles and nuke the sub from space.

NO PORN. NO EXCEPTIONS.

Edit: just read the rules... were these changed recently? What happened to the ban on porn? Now it says that porn just has to be tagged "ADULT". When the fuck did this happen? ...was there ever a ban on porn? If not, then it's high time there was one.

Wasn't OP banned at one point?

The fact that it's an aged account active on other sites as well points to how well planned this is. It's all about wearing people down so they accept subjective censorship.

Don't get me wrong, I think he's a piece of shit and none of what he posts belongs on a site that's based on good morals & values... it's not the case here though. Talk.voat is based on free speech absolutism, not morals & values.

Anyone who keeps making a big case out of this is being counter productive. The goal is not only to bring in censorship but also to shit up the place & cause drama which in turn kills the community itself.

There are many instances of multiple rapid downvotes when engaging certain users on the subject for example, it's obvious the drama is being controlled on both sides of the issue. That post morten egg carton lady is a great example of a drama manufacturer, everything she says is willfully exaggerated, emotional & meant to gaslight the issue.

Rotteux is playing both sides of the fence. He is egging blumen on and advising him how to “strategize”, then he goes around gaslighting and saying this art isn’t really sadistic or sexual and we’re all delusional and reading too much into these images. He’s playing games.