The site has spoken. You are wrong. It is a very simple matter of your interest in pictures that interest you *way* too much.
It is not normal. It does not coincide with traditional values. It is a very jewish interest. This is a site where we share common interests. Nobody else has that interest. We would prefer you performed a flip while leaping off a very tall building.
Sure there is a difference between "child porn" and "pre teen glamor," the first group includes the hundreds of i'net sites that have graphic material featuring the sexual assault and rape of minors, while PTG site have nudity but no sex.
See the glamor sites as a marriage mart, whereas in many places world wide girls are adjudged "nubile" and married off from about age seven .. we never hear from girls who were married at that age, despite from what I have seen they are very happy marriages, all we get is abortion lobbyists decrying "child marriage."
I will go on saying there are plenty of young girls would like nothing better than to get married, whose photographic portfolio on matchmaking sites would include nude spreads .. if old persons like the ones you encounter around here would wish to peruse the shots from time to time whassa matter with that :)
I wasn't aware that existed nor do I have any interest perusing them, but I appreciate you sharing that information.
The purpose of this post wasn't really about children specifically, just accurate language. It drives me nuts when people call something that it isn't to suit their agenda.
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 8 points 3.6 yearsOct 28, 2021 20:56:10 ago (+8/-0)
It is not normal. It does not coincide with traditional values. It is a very jewish interest. This is a site where we share common interests. Nobody else has that interest. We would prefer you performed a flip while leaping off a very tall building.
[ + ] 3starAgent
[ - ] 3starAgent 1 point 3.6 yearsOct 29, 2021 09:44:55 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 1 point 3.6 yearsOct 29, 2021 18:29:49 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] B4A_DownvoteSponge
[ - ] B4A_DownvoteSponge -1 points 3.6 yearsOct 29, 2021 15:41:03 ago (+0/-1)
My interest in the Mark Ryden stuff was solely to find stuff to trigger you crybabies with. I have no personal interest.
I am not wrong. Nudity does not equal pornography.
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 2 points 3.6 yearsOct 29, 2021 18:28:38 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Nagasaki
[ - ] Nagasaki 7 points 3.6 yearsOct 28, 2021 19:36:25 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 6 points 3.6 yearsOct 28, 2021 21:01:55 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] kes8
[ - ] kes8 6 points 3.6 yearsOct 28, 2021 20:03:21 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] FellowWhite
[ - ] FellowWhite 1 point 3.6 yearsOct 29, 2021 02:44:08 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] MartinTimothy
[ - ] MartinTimothy -6 points 3.6 yearsOct 28, 2021 20:55:44 ago (+1/-7)*
See the glamor sites as a marriage mart, whereas in many places world wide girls are adjudged "nubile" and married off from about age seven .. we never hear from girls who were married at that age, despite from what I have seen they are very happy marriages, all we get is abortion lobbyists decrying "child marriage."
I will go on saying there are plenty of young girls would like nothing better than to get married, whose photographic portfolio on matchmaking sites would include nude spreads .. if old persons like the ones you encounter around here would wish to peruse the shots from time to time whassa matter with that :)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 4 points 3.6 yearsOct 28, 2021 21:02:40 ago (+5/-1)
[ + ] B4A_DownvoteSponge
[ - ] B4A_DownvoteSponge -1 points 3.6 yearsOct 29, 2021 15:35:52 ago (+0/-1)
The purpose of this post wasn't really about children specifically, just accurate language. It drives me nuts when people call something that it isn't to suit their agenda.
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 1 point 3.6 yearsOct 29, 2021 18:31:38 ago (+1/-0)