A machine translation because the pic is dogshit. There will be errors. I tried to fix what I could.
Anonymous 06/18/18 (Mon) 09:55:31 ID 50498 No. 11737319
The reason why/pol, and a large portion of the Nationalist Intelligentsia' exists today is solely BECAUSE of chan culture. In a world of decadence and hedonism, we initially took the path of apathy Way back in the day that was what /b/ was. There was no purpose to anything: the atheists had taken away spirituality, the globalists had taken away nationalism, the historians had taken away pride and the government had taken away family.
The only forms of tribalism' left to us were based upon which sports team you supported or which genre of music you liked, and we all rejected that stuff as pathetic and lame. So we became apathetic to everything, while the rest of society tried desperately to find an identity and purpose in ANYTHING and EVERYTHING (which by the way is why they have gay pride', traps, weaboos, "nerds, and all this other shit), we simply laughed at the retardedness of it all, and sought the most insane shit out of this world of idiocy to amuse ourselves with Sure some of us apathetic types may have been degenerates who enjoyed some of those things, but it never formed our identity because that would be stupid. So we became apathetic, uncaring and directionless, the only thing we desired in life was to be amused, it was all about the lulz.
It made us strong. Everyone else was so busy trying to fit into one group or another, so busy virtue signalling about their morality despite having it based upon NOTHING, 50 busy pretending to give a shit lest others look down on them for not belonging (and NO ONE belonged anywhere because all forms of genuine identity had been destroyed), that they made themselves into paranoid, anxious, weak little faggots 4chan became right wing' because of our apathy, because we exposed ourself to the most horrific and evil shit out there and we never batted an eye-lid; the only thing that gave us a slight portion of happiness was humor and mainstream humor had already become the same identity-based virtue-signalling bullshit - so our humor became of the dark variety.
Thus we laughed at suicide, gore, killing sprees, rape, genocide, sexism, racism, EVERY conceivable taboo And finally we stumbled upon the taboo of Nazism. And being the apathetic arseholes we were, we decided to delve into it solely because we knew it pissed of all the virtue-signalling, identity-lacking faggots. And then we realized that had an identity, that we had always had an identity. We realised who took it away from us. We quickly realized our apathy was a curse placed upon by the great enemy, the parasite, the serpent, that old dragon and his children. The Jews.
And so now we have purpose Now we have an identity. Now we know the horrors of the world The Jews never stood a chance their purposeless world was always going to create an apathetic strain of humanity, and we were always going to indulge the darkest and most taboo things until we finally discovered their vile scheme and realized why the world as it was, why others were so weak, and why we had become so hollow Upon that realization, we were always going to immerse ourselves in our history, our philosophy, our people, we were always going to reject everything they had given us, we were always going to oppose everything they tried to do from then on, and once this great realization had been made. Once we knew that we were literally fighting a force of pure evil.
That we were all that stood in their way We were always going to fight back. We had no other choice. So we fought back in any and every way we could And now, with each passing year our victories grow. A decade ago you were not allowed to criticize immigration lest you be called a racist, now every nation has at least one mainstream party that is outspokenly against immigration in the UK every mainstream party supports stopping or at least stemming immigration, in the US the president was elected because he was going to build a wall to keep foreigners out in Hungary and Poland we see huge crowds tens of thousands strong marching through the street singing the glories of Nationalism; Italy has closed its ports and is setting up concentration camps that will house the foreigners until they can be deported with every passing moment our victory becomes more certain
They were doomed from the start their attempts to deny us our identity would always lead to us apathetic arseholes delving into every conceivable taboo until we finally discovered who were again. Upon that realization we were always going to do everything we could to fight back. Now we stand tall as strong men, mountains among great masses of pathetic weeds, and our power rises by the day. We are coming. We will not be stopped. Sieg heil
I think that sums it up very well, but not in the way it intends. The major reason pol identifies so hard with naziism is because their enemies promote it as their polar opposite. This is a problem because it means they're still under the control of their enemies, just through reverse psychology.
The only thing Hitler got 100% correct was naming the jew. Even then though he didn't take them fully seriously as a national enemy, I don't think he realised how hard they were going to lie about him and the german people.
Aside from that he mostly enacted whatever policies were fashionable at the time. His program for government wasn't significantly different from the USSR or the USSA. They only varied from each other in degree.
I agree with the jew thing, however, they got a lot of stuff right, and a lot of stuff wrong. Concentrating on making a strong society via making a strong family via making strong men is something I think every nation that isn't intent on self-destruction needs.
A healthy, fit, well-educated, and thinking people all working towards making a prosperous nation is the goal. But you can't do that with subversive jews and hateful dindus jealous of your successes destroying everything from within.
I'm not keen on the socialist aspect of it though. Men need to be competitive or it all falls apart in apathy and hedonism. By using monogamy we can control women's hypergamy(obviously it's more complex than that), allowing men to concentrate on other matters to compete over.
Like money. So long as a man can provide something to society, he should be able to earn resources to put where he sees fit. This is why I enjoy the Austrian economic model.
Men seeking to amass wealth will put forth more effort. Other men competing for that wealth will create more/better ways of earning that wealth.
Obviously this doesn't work in jew/mud-blood societies for reasons we all know very well by now.
Concentrating on making a strong society via making a strong family via making strong men is something I think every nation that isn't intent on self-destruction needs.
A healthy, fit, well-educated, and thinking people all working towards making a prosperous nation is the goal. But you can't do that with subversive jews and hateful dindus jealous of your successes destroying everything from within.
Definitely agreed.
I'm not keen on the socialist aspect of it though. Men need to be competitive or it all falls apart in apathy and hedonism. By using monogamy we can control women's hypergamy(obviously it's more complex than that), allowing men to concentrate on other matters to compete over.
Yeah. I think the main trap isn't hedonism though, it's dependence. If everyone's lives are organised for them and no one can fail, then over time people are bred for obedience and sheep behaviour. That's highly unstable because the sheep will follow the first shitty (or malicious) leader off a cliff.
Men seeking to amass wealth will put forth more effort. Other men competing for that wealth will create more/better ways of earning that wealth.
Actually... I don't think it's wealth as such that european men typically compete for, it's more like prestige and influence. If you look back at historical european societies the guys at the top were the givers of gold rather than the hoarders of gold.
Of course you need gold to give gold so it might be a fine distinction, but there is a huge difference between a culture that hoards wealth and one that spreads it around.
Obviously this doesn't work in jew/mud-blood societies for reasons we all know very well by now.
Yeah. I think the main trap isn't hedonism though, it's dependence.
Good point. The poisoned pill of welfare is the dependence that it creates. This is why community hand-ups, generally private or church organized, is the way to go. Because it is local and people can be held to account by the very community they get their gibs from.
Of course you need gold to give gold so it might be a fine distinction, but there is a huge difference between a culture that hoards wealth and one that spreads it around.
Wealth, not riches, is the distinction here. Wealth is land, properties, and skills that allow you to accomplish stuff. Money is merely riches, an exchange medium to grease the wheels of barter.
I think that, once we solve the competition to amass women, wealth acquisition (mainly for your family) is what men compete for. Prestige and influence can be a good way to achieve these things, though they can, in-an-of-themselves become a goal. Getting your name written in history is a big draw for many men.
Good point. The poisoned pill of welfare is the dependence that it creates. This is why community hand-ups, generally private or church organized, is the way to go. Because it is local and people can be held to account by the very community they get their gibs from.
Yes, exactly. That's how it used to be in most countries up until the late 19th century. Aside from churches fraternal societies used to handle social and medical insurance.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 6 points 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 10:55:07 ago (+6/-0)
Anonymous 06/18/18 (Mon) 09:55:31 ID 50498 No. 11737319
The reason why/pol, and a large portion of the Nationalist Intelligentsia' exists today is solely BECAUSE of chan culture. In a world of decadence and hedonism, we initially took the path of apathy Way back in the day that was what /b/ was. There was no purpose to anything: the atheists had taken away spirituality, the globalists had taken away nationalism, the historians had taken away pride and the government had taken away family.
The only forms of tribalism' left to us were based upon which sports team you supported or which genre of music you liked, and we all rejected that stuff as pathetic and lame. So we became apathetic to everything, while the rest of society tried desperately to find an identity and purpose in ANYTHING and EVERYTHING (which by the way is why they have gay pride', traps, weaboos, "nerds, and all this other shit), we simply laughed at the retardedness of it all, and sought the most insane shit out of this world of idiocy to amuse ourselves with Sure some of us apathetic types may have been degenerates who enjoyed some of those things, but it never formed our identity because that would be stupid. So we became apathetic, uncaring and directionless, the only thing we desired in life was to be amused, it was all about the lulz.
It made us strong. Everyone else was so busy trying to fit into one group or another, so busy virtue signalling about their morality despite having it based upon NOTHING, 50 busy pretending to give a shit lest others look down on them for not belonging (and NO ONE belonged anywhere because all forms of genuine identity had been destroyed), that they made themselves into paranoid, anxious, weak little faggots 4chan became right wing' because of our apathy, because we exposed ourself to the most horrific and evil shit out there and we never batted an eye-lid; the only thing that gave us a slight portion of happiness was humor and mainstream humor had already become the same identity-based virtue-signalling bullshit - so our humor became of the dark variety.
Thus we laughed at suicide, gore, killing sprees, rape, genocide, sexism, racism, EVERY conceivable taboo And finally we stumbled upon the taboo of Nazism. And being the apathetic arseholes we were, we decided to delve into it solely because we knew it pissed of all the virtue-signalling, identity-lacking faggots. And then we realized that had an identity, that we had always had an identity. We realised who took it away from us. We quickly realized our apathy was a curse placed upon by the great enemy, the parasite, the serpent, that old dragon and his children. The Jews.
And so now we have purpose Now we have an identity. Now we know the horrors of the world The Jews never stood a chance their purposeless world was always going to create an apathetic strain of humanity, and we were always going to indulge the darkest and most taboo things until we finally discovered their vile scheme and realized why the world as it was, why others were so weak, and why we had become so hollow Upon that realization, we were always going to immerse ourselves in our history, our philosophy, our people, we were always going to reject everything they had given us, we were always going to oppose everything they tried to do from then on, and once this great realization had been made. Once we knew that we were literally fighting a force of pure evil.
That we were all that stood in their way We were always going to fight back. We had no other choice. So we fought back in any and every way we could And now, with each passing year our victories grow. A decade ago you were not allowed to criticize immigration lest you be called a racist, now every nation has at least one mainstream party that is outspokenly against immigration in the UK every mainstream party supports stopping or at least stemming immigration, in the US the president was elected because he was going to build a wall to keep foreigners out in Hungary and Poland we see huge crowds tens of thousands strong marching through the street singing the glories of Nationalism; Italy has closed its ports and is setting up concentration camps that will house the foreigners until they can be deported with every passing moment our victory becomes more certain
They were doomed from the start their attempts to deny us our identity would always lead to us apathetic arseholes delving into every conceivable taboo until we finally discovered who were again. Upon that realization we were always going to do everything we could to fight back. Now we stand tall as strong men, mountains among great masses of pathetic weeds, and our power rises by the day. We are coming. We will not be stopped. Sieg heil
[ + ] Mopar_or_nocar24
[ - ] Mopar_or_nocar24 [op] 0 points 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 11:54:17 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] patchCodeUnsuccessful
[ - ] patchCodeUnsuccessful 4 points 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 01:40:10 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 3 points 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 07:42:55 ago (+4/-1)
The only thing Hitler got 100% correct was naming the jew. Even then though he didn't take them fully seriously as a national enemy, I don't think he realised how hard they were going to lie about him and the german people.
Aside from that he mostly enacted whatever policies were fashionable at the time. His program for government wasn't significantly different from the USSR or the USSA. They only varied from each other in degree.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 3 points 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 10:47:24 ago (+3/-0)
A healthy, fit, well-educated, and thinking people all working towards making a prosperous nation is the goal. But you can't do that with subversive jews and hateful dindus jealous of your successes destroying everything from within.
I'm not keen on the socialist aspect of it though. Men need to be competitive or it all falls apart in apathy and hedonism. By using monogamy we can control women's hypergamy(obviously it's more complex than that), allowing men to concentrate on other matters to compete over.
Like money. So long as a man can provide something to society, he should be able to earn resources to put where he sees fit. This is why I enjoy the Austrian economic model.
Men seeking to amass wealth will put forth more effort. Other men competing for that wealth will create more/better ways of earning that wealth.
Obviously this doesn't work in jew/mud-blood societies for reasons we all know very well by now.
[ + ] FleurBlue
[ - ] FleurBlue 1 point 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 11:09:37 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 1 point 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 14:41:28 ago (+1/-0)
Definitely agreed.
Yeah. I think the main trap isn't hedonism though, it's dependence. If everyone's lives are organised for them and no one can fail, then over time people are bred for obedience and sheep behaviour. That's highly unstable because the sheep will follow the first shitty (or malicious) leader off a cliff.
Actually... I don't think it's wealth as such that european men typically compete for, it's more like prestige and influence. If you look back at historical european societies the guys at the top were the givers of gold rather than the hoarders of gold.
Of course you need gold to give gold so it might be a fine distinction, but there is a huge difference between a culture that hoards wealth and one that spreads it around.
Totally, well said.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 1 point 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 20:46:15 ago (+1/-0)
Good point. The poisoned pill of welfare is the dependence that it creates. This is why community hand-ups, generally private or church organized, is the way to go. Because it is local and people can be held to account by the very community they get their gibs from.
Wealth, not riches, is the distinction here. Wealth is land, properties, and skills that allow you to accomplish stuff. Money is merely riches, an exchange medium to grease the wheels of barter.
I think that, once we solve the competition to amass women, wealth acquisition (mainly for your family) is what men compete for. Prestige and influence can be a good way to achieve these things, though they can, in-an-of-themselves become a goal. Getting your name written in history is a big draw for many men.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 21:02:52 ago (+0/-0)
Yes, exactly. That's how it used to be in most countries up until the late 19th century. Aside from churches fraternal societies used to handle social and medical insurance.
[ + ] jigganiggaboo
[ - ] jigganiggaboo 3 points 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 01:33:26 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Mopar_or_nocar24
[ - ] Mopar_or_nocar24 [op] 1 point 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 01:37:04 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] NeonGreen
[ - ] NeonGreen 2 points 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 09:21:15 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 04:04:05 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] NeonGreen
[ - ] NeonGreen 0 points 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 09:21:58 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Mopar_or_nocar24
[ - ] Mopar_or_nocar24 [op] 0 points 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 10:30:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 0 points 3.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 10:57:34 ago (+0/-0)